An active frame relay profile without an active frame relay connection will cause a MAX not to answer incoming calls on a channelized T1 after about an hour. The time span is actually less if many calls are incoming. This problem may also affect PRIs too ... I have not tested this yet, but it is does affect all available versions of 5.x code. Most of us are not silly enough (at least not me, anymore) to define a frame profile with no working frame conection. However, if you have a frame connection on your MAX and it goes down and you still expect the MAX to take calls ... Erich Stick Sierra-Net Internet service SysOp (702) 832-6911 erichs@sierra.net ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: <<A HREF="http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq">http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq</A>> </PRE> <!--X-MsgBody-End--> <!--X-Follow-Ups--> <!--X-Follow-Ups-End--> <!--X-References--> <!--X-References-End--> <!--X-BotPNI--> <HR> <UL> <LI>Prev by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg08982.html">Re: (ASCEND) NAT on ftp sessions</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg08979.html">Re: (ASCEND) Lost wan ports 3 & 4</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Prev by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg09012.html">Re: (ASCEND) Max 4000 & P50</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg08981.html">(ASCEND) Web interface for seeing whois on a max</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Index(es): <UL> <LI><A HREF="mail5.html#09098"><STRONG>Main</STRONG></A></LI> <LI><A HREF="thrd175.html#09098"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI> </UL> </LI> </UL> <!--X-BotPNI-End--> <!--X-User-Footer--> <!--X-User-Footer-End--> </BODY> </HTML>