No Subject

This only refers to the old many-to-many IP address translation that utilized
DHCP server on the remote side. Single-IP mode NAT supports multiple local
hosts with a SINGLE assigned IP from the server.

5.1A will work the way you wanted it...

>On the subject of Multiple-IP mode NAT, does the other have to correctly
>support this?  My ISP has a Livingston BRI, does anyone know if
>Livingston supports this?

All that's required is that the remote end will assign you a single IP
address (32-bit netmask) - whether it's a dedicated address, or dynamic
doesn't matter. I have no reason to believe the Livingston cannot do that.


Kevin


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	&lt;<A HREF="http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq">http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq</A>&gt;

</PRE>
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<HR>
<STRONG>References</STRONG>:
<UL>
<LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg08762.html">(ASCEND) Multi-IP NAT</A></STRONG></LI>
<UL>
<LI><EM>From</EM>: rj &lt;rjm@cet.com&gt;</LI>
</UL>
</UL>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<HR>
<UL>
<LI>Prev by Date:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg08767.html">Re: (ASCEND) TNT E100 memory leak</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Next by Date:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg08764.html">(ASCEND) FS: 2 pipeline 50's</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Prev by thread:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg08762.html">(ASCEND) Multi-IP NAT</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Next by thread:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg08788.html">RE: (ASCEND) Multi-IP NAT</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Index(es):
<UL>
<LI><A HREF="mail5.html#08766"><STRONG>Main</STRONG></A></LI>
<LI><A HREF="thrd166.html#08766"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI>
</UL>
</LI>
</UL>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</BODY>
</HTML>