I wonder if perhaps these people were making 2B calls and the accounting slapped a 0.0.0.0 framed address there instead of the address of the first B channel call? Can anyone else verify this behavior? I'm running the 5.0Ap23 software and the radius daemon known as: radiusd: RADIUS version 1.16 (plus Ascend extensions) 97/08/14 BINARY_FILTERS ASCEND_SECRET ASCEND_LOGOUT sys5 M_UNIX I am only using Framed connections - no immediate telnet or any of those other goofy things. Is that were the real bugs are at? Of course, immediate telnet and those types of connections don't *have* framed addresses so... ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: <<A HREF="http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq">http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq</A>> </PRE> <!--X-MsgBody-End--> <!--X-Follow-Ups--> <HR> <STRONG>Follow-Ups</STRONG>: <UL> <LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg04111.html">Re: (ASCEND) Possible help for Ascend: 0.0.0.0 framed address</A></STRONG></LI> <UL> <LI><EM>From</EM>: Joe Portman <baron@ws4.aa.net></LI> </UL> <LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg04093.html">Re: (ASCEND) RADIF and RADACCT debug crashes Maxes</A></STRONG></LI> <UL> <LI><EM>From</EM>: Josh Bailey <joshb@xtra.co.nz></LI> </UL> </UL> <!--X-Follow-Ups-End--> <!--X-References--> <!--X-References-End--> <!--X-BotPNI--> <HR> <UL> <LI>Prev by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg04110.html">Re: (ASCEND) DOVBS?</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg04087.html">Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4000 + 56K modem cards != fire</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Prev by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg04087.html">Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4000 + 56K modem cards != fire</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg04093.html">Re: (ASCEND) RADIF and RADACCT debug crashes Maxes</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Index(es): <UL> <LI><A HREF="mail2.html#04083"><STRONG>Main</STRONG></A></LI> <LI><A HREF="thrd158.html#04083"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI> </UL> </LI> </UL> <!--X-BotPNI-End--> <!--X-User-Footer--> <!--X-User-Footer-End--> </BODY> </HTML>