Re: (ASCEND) Multi-IP NAT (fwd)

To: Jake Messinger <jake@ams.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Multi-IP NAT (fwd)
From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 15:21:26 -0700
Cc: ascend-users@max.bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.970916194441.21527H-100000@linux.ams.com>
References: <199709162247.PAA14201@server.livingston.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 07:45 PM 9/16/97 -0500, Jake Messinger wrote:
>On Tue, 16 Sep 1997, MegaZone wrote:
>
>> Once upon a time rj shaped the electrons to say...
>> >On the subject of Multiple-IP mode NAT, does the other have to correctly
>> >support this?  My ISP has a Livingston BRI, does anyone know if
>> >Livingston supports this?
>> 
>> I'm not sure what is required of the head end.  Just routing you multiple
>> IPs?
>> 
>> If that's all, sure, the ISP can do it.  But you'll almost invariably have
>> to pay them more for the use of the IPS.
>
>This is interesting. I was wondering how to increase or bond 2 bri's if
>the customer has 2 pipe 50's. Can it be done? Can it be done if the isp,
>(us) has a Max? (we do).

No. We did not implement multi-chassis MP over the Pipeline units.


Kevin


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

(ASCEND) Multi-IP NAT (fwd)

From: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com>

Re: (ASCEND) Multi-IP NAT (fwd)

From: Jake Messinger <jake@ams.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) 32HDLC card
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) dslpipe-s issues.
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Multi-IP NAT (fwd)
Next by thread: (ASCEND) LAN Security Error
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread