Re: (ASCEND) Multi-Trunk Hunting on single Max

To: Jim Freeman <jfreeman@athens.net>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Multi-Trunk Hunting on single Max
From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 09:52:54 -0700
Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.3.96.970916204732.29778B-100000@olympus.athens.net>
References: <34192B3A.D0E49C9F@suite224.net>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 09:01 PM 9/16/97 -0400, Jim Freeman wrote:
>Ascend-users:
>
>Due to issues at the central office here one of our Maxes had to be
>provisioned with two trunk groups for two PRI, instead of one NFAS trunk
>group as we have done before. 
>
>This max has two PRI, of NI-2 switch type installed and when the first
>fills the second is supposed to get new calls.
>
>Instead, I am hearing the "All Customer Facilities are Busy" message.  I
>know that the telco knows it is supposed to be setup for overflow and I
>remember the translations guy telling me we were setup for that. 

This has nothing to do with the Max. It's all up to the C.O. switch. As
long as the second PRI is active, it won't block calls from the switch.


Matt Holdrege  -  http://www.ascend.com  -  matt@ascend.com
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

(ASCEND) 56k on DMS 10

From: Tom Gwilt <tomgwilt@suite224.net>

(ASCEND) Multi-Trunk Hunting on single Max

From: Jim Freeman <jfreeman@athens.net>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Has anyone see this
Next by Date: (ASCEND) DEBUG?
Prev by thread: (ASCEND) Multi-Trunk Hunting on single Max
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) 56k on DMS 10
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread