Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) MAX stacking
Jason,
I'm wondering about a couple of things.
Are you going to have 80+ maxen on the same Ethernet collision segment, or
are you going through a switch?
Is their link towards the cloud ultimately via some high speed interface
such as 100 mbps or better?
The reason I'm wondering is that even just two 4000's fully configured and
loaded but NOT using stacking, could potentially saturate a 10 mbps LAN
segment. The RUBB says to the effect that stacking can add a very
significant amount of traffic overhead. I'm wondering how you're going to
avoid bottle-necking on your LAN.
Joseph
At 03:30 PM 9/15/97 -0400, Jason Nealis wrote:
>
> Cool, But I'm wondering what problems await me when I split them over 80+
>maxes on the same wire. Hopefully it will work as well as it does for you.
>
>Jason
>
>
>On Sat, 13 Sep 1997, Jonah Yokubaitis wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 12 Sep 1997, Jason Nealis wrote:
>>
>> |
>> | I haven't seend anyone using it yet, I too am considering stacking
>> |shortly, But will most likely await full deployment of K56 before I
>> |tackle stacking.
>> |
>> |Jason Nealis
>> |
>>
>> We have had GREAT luck with max stacking...I have split channels right
>> now over 2 MAXen. I am using a P75 though, but we get no complaints
>> for our dialup isdn people..
>>
>> Jonah
>>
>> Jonah Barron Yokubaitis | Austin|San Antonio|Houston
>> President | Dallas|Fort Worth|Boerne
>> Texas.Net | Georgetown|Dripping Springs
>> http://www.texas.net | Making 56k affordable
>>
>>
>
>++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups: