Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) P75: Is AddPers being ignored in 5.1A?
On Sun, 7 Sep 1997, Mark Hilbush wrote:
> I just installed 5.1A in my rev B Pipeline 75. Overall, it's a very
> nice release and I'm extremely happy with single address NAT.
Will that 5.1a work on a p25 to get single address nat?
>
> I have run into one problem however. I am using MP+ to access my ISP
> which has MAX equipment on their end. Prior to installing 5.1A, the
> dynamic bandwidth allocation algorithm worked as advertised. However,
> since installing 5.1A, the P75 no longer waits AddPers seconds before
> adding the second channel. Immediately upon reaching ALU >= TargetUtil,
> the P75 bring up the second B-channel. Is anybody who uses MPP having
> this same problem?
>
> My settings are:
> Encaps=MPP
> EncapsOptions->BaseChCount=1
> EncapsOptions->MinChCount=1
> EncapsOptions->MaxChCount=2
> EncapsOptions->DynAlg=Quadratic
> EncapsOptions->SecHistory=15
> EncapsOptions->AddPers=15
> EncapsOptions->SubPers=60
> EncapsOptions->TargetUtil=60
> EncapsOptions->IdlePct=0
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> --
> Mark Hilbush
>
> Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.
> -- Albert Einstein
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
Jake Messinger 713-772-6690 jake@ams.com
Advanced Medical Systems, Inc. jake@uh.edu
8300 Bissonnet #400
Houston, Texas 77074 http://www.ams.com/~jake
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups:
References: