Re: (ASCEND) P75: Is AddPers being ignored in 5.1A?

To: Jake Messinger <jake@ams.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) P75: Is AddPers being ignored in 5.1A?
From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 15:42:29 -0700
Cc: Ascend Users <ascend-users@bungi.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.970907120728.26578A-100000@linux.ams.com>
References: <3412B119.7D846A20@clark.net>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 12:07 PM 9/7/97 -0500, Jake Messinger wrote:
>On Sun, 7 Sep 1997, Mark Hilbush wrote:
>
>> I just installed 5.1A in my rev B Pipeline 75.  Overall, it's a very
>> nice release and I'm extremely happy with single address NAT.
>
>Will that 5.1a work on a p25 to get single address nat?

No, see the release notes for details. (5.1ap1 for the P25).


Kevin


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

(ASCEND) P75: Is AddPers being ignored in 5.1A?

From: Mark Hilbush <markh@clark.net>

Re: (ASCEND) P75: Is AddPers being ignored in 5.1A?

From: Jake Messinger <jake@ams.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline 75b NAT vs Quake World
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Lost Password on an 4002
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) P75: Is AddPers being ignored in 5.1A?
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) P75: Is AddPers being ignored in 5.1A?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread