Re: (ASCEND) Re: NFAS?

To: Jim Howard <jhoward@lyceum.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Re: NFAS?
From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 15:00:57 -0800
Cc: ascend-users@max.bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19971218205757.01726c28@pop.lyceum.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 03:57 PM 12/18/97 -0500, Jim Howard wrote:
>now, I havn't throughly studied the info that the NIUF sent me,
>but I think the way its supposed to work is that the end user
>sends X.25 data over their D channel which is put into X.75 at the CO,
>and on the NAS end we'll need to dedicate specific channels to X.75.

The end user sends X.25 over his BRI D channel, the switch sends it out an
X.25 interface. It *may* go through an X.75 connection within the carrier
network or to another network. Then it goes in an X.25 link to the Max.
That link could be over any interface. It would likely be over T1/E1 or the
V.35 interface.

Matt Holdrege		http://www.ascend.com	matt@ascend.com
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Re: NFAS?

From: Jim Howard <jhoward@lyceum.com>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Strange problem with 5.0Ap36 and dialout
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap38 for the MAX products
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Re: NFAS?
Next by thread: (ASCEND) Re: tik.m40 working at all?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread