(ASCEND) Re: OSPF question

To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com
Subject: (ASCEND) Re: OSPF question
From: Peter Lalor <plalor@infoasis.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 1997 15:13:07 -0700
Cc: bruce@greatbasin.net
In-Reply-To: <199708270056.RAA19708@max.bungi.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

>In the past, we've tried to use OSPF on the Maxen and had the usual troubles
>with it.  The consensus on this list seems to be that if I "flatten" out my
>OSPF configuration, getting rid of the stub areas and making everything be
>the backbone, OSPF should be stable.  Does this match everyone's experience?

We run OSPF between a 4000 (5.0Ap16) and a TNT (1.3A), area 0, with no
problems.

This was not the case in earlier releases and frankly I'm afraid to upgrade
although I can see I'm going to have to to address K56 problems.

Peter Lalor
Infoasis
plalor@infoasis.com
http://www.infoasis.com/
415-459-7991 x102
415-459-7992 fax


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

Re: (ASCEND) Re: OSPF question

From: Joe Portman <baron@ws4.aa.net>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Zoom 1.002A code
Next by Date: (ASCEND) Re: Database of docs?
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Re: Database of docs?
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Re: OSPF question
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread