Re: (ASCEND) Modem -Trn level

To: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Modem -Trn level
From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 1997 11:50:45 -0700
Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <199708221322.JAA29036@Iodine.Mlink.NET>
References: <Your message of "Thu, 21 Aug 1997 18:16:08 EDT." <3.0.1.32.19970821181608.00a7cbf0@mktg_srv.ascend.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 09:22 AM 8/22/97 -0400, Phillip Vandry wrote:
>> From the 5.0A release notes page 151:
>> 
>> Modem transmit level can now be set: This feature allows users to modify
the 
>> internal transmit level of the Rockwell digital modems.
>> 
>> How it works: A new parameter has been added to make the transmit level
seen 
>> by the codec within a digital modem be programmable. By transmitting at
>> higher 
>> level, it helps certain modems on their near-end-echo problems.
>
>So if a higher level means better results, why not hardcode the highest
>possible level?
>
>Or is there an omitted "On the other hand" part to this sentence? :-)

Default values are normally the best - that's why we chose them as default.
(There
are some cases where that may be questioned, and we usually change them if
there
is a good argument). As it states in the notes "it helps certain modems on
their
near-end-echo problems." It's not a fix-all, and is usually only changed
when you
are having problems with the default.

Kevin

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

Re: (ASCEND) Modem -Trn level

From: Mark S Lane <mlane@exodus.3wave.com>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Modem -Trn level

From: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) tftp file locations
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) no connect with older modems after upgrade
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Modem -Trn level
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Modem -Trn level
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread