Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(ASCEND) Re: ascend-users-digest V96 #760
> From: owner-ascend-users-digest@max.bungi.com
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 17:51:12 -0700
> To: ascend-users-digest@max.bungi.com
> Subject: ascend-users-digest V96 #760
> Reply-to: ascend-users@max.bungi.com
>
> ascend-users-digest Thursday, 21 August 1997 Volume 96 : Number 760
>
> In this issue:
>
> Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap20 for MAX products
> (ASCEND) MaxTNT test report
> (ASCEND) radius scripts
> Re: (ASCEND) Rebooting the Max
> Re: OSPF bugs (was Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap20 for MAX products)
> (ASCEND) Modem -Trn level
> Re: (ASCEND) ZOOM 56K V1.0 Flash
> (ASCEND) SAM Firewall Question - Blocking IP Addresses
> RE: (ASCEND) SAM Firewall Question - Blocking IP Addresses
> (ASCEND) Ascend to Bay
> Re: (ASCEND) Maxen ethernet port fdx or hdx?
> Re: (ASCEND) Limiting Users
> Re: (ASCEND) ZOOM 56K V1.0 Flash
> Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap20 for MAX products
> (ASCEND) Ascend Max 1800
> (ASCEND) RIP and TNT 1.3Ap5
> (ASCEND) MAX4000 and Frame Relay
> (ASCEND) Entering PPP Mode on MAX
> Re: (ASCEND) Entering PPP Mode on MAX
> (ASCEND) Correction - 1.3Ap5 for MAX TNT
> Re: (ASCEND) Maxen ethernet port fdx or hdx?
> Re: (ASCEND) LOTS of c=185
> Re: (ASCEND) MAX4000 and Frame Relay
> Re: (ASCEND) About MS-STAC compression
> (ASCEND) Re: ascend-users-digest V96 #758
> (ASCEND) Hayes 1.0 Code
> Re: (ASCEND) Ascend Max 1800
> Re: (ASCEND) Re: ascend-users-digest V96 #758
> Re: (ASCEND) Ascend Max 1800
> (ASCEND) tftp file locations
> Re: (ASCEND) New P75 - When was it released?
> Re: (ASCEND) New P75 - When was it released?
> Re: (ASCEND) New P75 - When was it released?
> Re: (ASCEND) Rebooting the Max
> (ASCEND) Re: ascend-users-digest V96 #758
> Re: (ASCEND) Rebooting the Max
> (ASCEND) ascend software releases
> (ASCEND) Correction: 5.0Ap20
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NL.net>
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 09:26:38 +0200
> Subject: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap20 for MAX products
>
> Any known V.FC or V.FAST connects yet ?
>
> We have 5.0Ap20 on two MAX 4000 now and don't seem to get either
> connect to work.
>
> jaap
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: "Ales Kriznik" <Ales.Kriznik@mibo.si>
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 10:17:38 +0200
> Subject: (ASCEND) MaxTNT test report
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> - ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01BCAE1B.73615580
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Bay Networks commissioned The Tolly Group to evaluate three remote
> access concentrators: the Bay Networks 5399, the Ascend MAX TNT and the
> Total Control Enterprise Network Hub from U.S. Robotics. The Tolly Group
> conducted scalability tests for up to 46 simultaneous IP file transfers
> over 28.8 Kbit/s analog dial-up. (Search our test results database on
> document 7288.)
>
> http://www.tolly.com/online_1/testresults/documents/main.cfm
>
>
> - ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ales Kriznik tel.: ++386-61-1735299
> MIBO Integra fax.:++386-61-1735243
> Zelezna 14 e-mail: ales@mibo.si
> 1000 Ljubljana
> _________________________________________=20
>
>
> - ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01BCAE1B.73615580
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
> <HTML>
> <HEAD>
>
> <META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
> http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
> <META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.71.1008.3"' name=3DGENERATOR>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
> <P><FONT color=3D#000000 face=3DArial size=3D2> Bay Networks =
> commissioned The=20
> Tolly Group to evaluate three remote<BR>access concentrators: the Bay =
> Networks=20
> 5399, the Ascend MAX TNT and the<BR>Total Control Enterprise Network Hub =
> from=20
> U.S. Robotics. The Tolly Group<BR>conducted scalability tests for up to =
> 46=20
> simultaneous IP file transfers<BR>over 28.8 Kbit/s analog dial-up. =
> (Search our=20
> test results database on<BR>document 7288.)<BR><BR><A=20
> href=3D"http://www.tolly.com/online_1/testresults/documents/main.cfm">htt=
> p://www.tolly.com/online_1/testresults/documents/main.cfm</A><BR></FONT><=
> /P>
> <P><FONT color=3D#000000 face=3DArial=20
> size=3D2>----------------------------------------------------------------=
> - -----<BR>Ales=20
> Kriznik tel.: ++386-61-1735299<BR>MIBO Integra =
> =20
> fax.:++386-61-1735243<BR>Zelezna 14 e-mail:=20
> ales@mibo.si<BR>1000 =
> Ljubljana<BR>_________________________________________=20
> </FONT></P></BODY></HTML>
>
> - ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01BCAE1B.73615580--
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Andrew Thompson <andrewt@i-way.co.uk>
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 10:41:16 +0100
> Subject: (ASCEND) radius scripts
>
> Hi
> Does anyone know where there is a collection of scripts for parsing
> radius accounting logs? I've got the 3 from livingston, but I'd like to
> know if there are any more available.
> Thanks
>
> - --
> Andrew Thompson andrewt@i-way.co.uk
> I-Way Ltd +44 118 958 0058
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 06:07:15 -0400 (EDT)
> Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Rebooting the Max
>
> You may want to look at 5.0ap8 it seems that in the release notes for
> that release they said that PPP negoaition (spell?) is faster, I haven't
> check this nor have has ascend told me why it's faster, but it may be
> what your looking for.
>
> Jason
>
>
> On Wed, 20 Aug 1997, Jimmy Martyniak wrote:
>
> > Ever since our upgrade from 4.6c seems it taks about 20 minutes before PPP
> > (so I think) takes place. Doesn't bother me but its one of those rainy
> > day things!!
> >
> > Please forgive if I missed an FAQ somewhere!!
> >
> >
> > Jimmy Martyniak
> > Sagelink Internet Service Providers
> > (609) 589-3036
> > http://www.sagelink.com
> > martynjc@sagelink.com
> >
> > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> > To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> >
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: "Alex.Bligh" <amb@xara.net>
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 11:07:08 +0100
> Subject: Re: OSPF bugs (was Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap20 for MAX products)
>
> >
> >
> > Curious, Are you running everything in area 0,, Rather than doing stub
> > areas?
>
> No. Ascends at each pop in a given area. Backbone in area 0. But
> routed network customers have their adverts travel across the
> backbone obviously.
>
> Alex Bligh
> Xara Networks
>
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: "K.R.Kumar" <krkumar@pacific.net.sg>
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 19:43:58 +0800
> Subject: (ASCEND) Modem -Trn level
>
> Hi
>
> We are trying to test out 5.0AP20 code
> in MAX4XX.
>
> When we have tuned Modem Trn Level = - XX
> [ Ethernet-Modeconf-Tserv-modem rn level]
> we got better results on our 56k internal modem
>
> Shall we know what is Modem Trn Level and
> Tcp clear = yes option in Answer - Encaps -
> TcpClear menu.
>
> Any help is much appreciated.
>
> Regds
> K.R.Kumar
>
>
>
> - --
>
>
> It's easier to make a working system efficient than
> to make an efficient system work.
>
> ***************************************************
>
> K.R.Kumar email:krkumar@pacific.net.sg
> Pacific Internet Pte Ltd., Phone:872 0322
> 89 Science Park Drive Fax :773 6812
> #04-09 / 12 The Rutherford,
> Singapore Science Park,
> Singapore - 118261.
>
> ***************************************************
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Darkshot <darkshot@chudys.com>
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 10:49:20 -0400
> Subject: Re: (ASCEND) ZOOM 56K V1.0 Flash
>
> Dave Berzins wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone have a beta copy of the V1.0 K56Flex FLASH ROM update for a
> > ZOOM modem? I can't seem to find it on their site, and their technical
> > support people are not much help so? Anyone? Anyone?
> >
> > Dave...
> >
>
> We've been on the phone with Zoom weekly trying to get something
> from them on this issue. We always talk to the same overworked
> tech, so I dunno what the heck is going on at zoomtel.
>
> Last word was Real Soon Now.
>
> On the other hand, we have a .516 Zoom modem that works great,
> about an hour a day. Rest of the time it won't connect at all
> unless K56 is disabled a'la +MS=11
>
> The "time it works" varies, too- but unrelated to anything I
> can put my finger on. We've been playing with it 3 weeks now.
>
> But when it DOES work.....it absolutely flies. Go figure. Other
> Zoom modems with the same software rev do not display this
> odd behavior.
>
> My best guess: "Magic is loose in the world."
> -Heinlein (Waldo)
>
> 'Shot
>
> - --
> Darkshot (Michael B. Garrett)
> <http://www.gloryroad.net>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Mike Adams <madams@orca.net>
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 09:57:17 -0500
> Subject: (ASCEND) SAM Firewall Question - Blocking IP Addresses
>
> If we set up a firewall and want to allow access to our web site for
> everywhere, but want to exclude web site access from certain class "c"
> networks... Can I use the restricted sites to block just these class
> "c" addresses from all access to our sites? Is there a better way?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
> Mike Adams
> Orca Technologies
> (713)462-6722 x106
> madams@orca.net
> http://www.orca.net
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: "Scott R. Chrestman" <src@netropolis.net>
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 11:21:52 -0500
> Subject: RE: (ASCEND) SAM Firewall Question - Blocking IP Addresses
>
> >From the Secure Access Manager Helpfile:
>
> The Restricted Site option configures the firewall to block traffic to/from
> the sites listed in the "Between Local" and "And Remote" boxes. Simply
> click on the "Don't Allow Anything" option and enter the host and network
> addresses in the boxes below.
>
> That sounds about the easiest way. Only other thing I can think of is to
> use IP Filters, but you are limited, if I remember correctly.
> So, just put an '*' in the "Between Local" box, and then list the class c's
> in the "And Remote" box. Hope this helps!
>
>
> Scott R. Chrestman
> System Administrator
> Netropolis Communications Corp.
> src@netropolis.net
>
> - -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Adams [SMTP:madams@orca.net]
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 1997 9:57 AM
> To: 'ascend-users@bungi.com'
> Subject: (ASCEND) SAM Firewall Question - Blocking IP Addresses
>
> If we set up a firewall and want to allow access to our web site for
> everywhere, but want to exclude web site access from certain class "c"
> networks... Can I use the restricted sites to block just these class
> "c" addresses from all access to our sites? Is there a better way?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
> Mike Adams
> Orca Technologies
> (713)462-6722 x106
> madams@orca.net
> http://www.orca.net
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Glenn Howard <sysadmin@indy1.pgweb.com>
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 09:33:25 -0700
> Subject: (ASCEND) Ascend to Bay
>
> - --------------32941871C9E2CCE79A9D3BB1
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> I'm trying to connect a Bay Networks to our Max4000. He can connect to
> us, if he does not use CHAP and if he uses PPP. BUT, after connecting,
> he is not able to route any IP. He is not even able to ping his own
> router on his network. Is there any special settings to connect a BAY
> networks hub to my MAX? Bay networks has been LESS than helpfull about
> the whole deal.
>
> Thanks for any help.
>
>
> - --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Glenn Howard Borealis Communications
> sysadmin@pgweb.com Systems Administrator
> 250 562 0616
> http://www.pgweb.com
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
> - --------------32941871C9E2CCE79A9D3BB1
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> <HTML>
> I'm trying to connect a Bay Networks to our Max4000. He can connect
> to us, if he does not use CHAP and if he uses PPP. BUT, after connecting,
> he is not able to route any IP. He is not even able to ping his own
> router on his network. Is there any special settings to connect a
> BAY networks hub to my MAX? Bay networks has been LESS than helpfull
> about the whole deal.
>
> <P>Thanks for any help.
> <BR>
> <PRE>--
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Glenn Howard Borealis Communications
> sysadmin@pgweb.com Systems Administrator
> 250 562 0616
> <A HREF="http://www.pgweb.com">http://www.pgweb.com</A>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</PRE>
> </HTML>
>
> - --------------32941871C9E2CCE79A9D3BB1--
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Jim Howard <jhoward@lyceum.com>
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 13:17:07 -0400
> Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Maxen ethernet port fdx or hdx?
>
> At 16:55 08/20/1997 -0500, Joseph Bridgewater wrote:
> >Probably covered elsewhere, but I haven't seen it:
> >
> >1) Is the 10BaseT Ethernet port on the 4000 only half-duplex, only
> >full-duplex, or auto-sensing fdx/hdx?
>
> standard 10bT, half-duplex only
>
> even if the interface supported more,
> I doubt the processor could handle it...
>
> >2) If it is only hdx, what are the implications in using a couple 4000's
> >on a LAN otherwise configured to be full-duplex?
>
> since you should only be using full-duplex going into a switch,
> there should be no problem. I have mine on a 10/100 auto-sensing switch
> with the rest of my core equipment, a mix of 10M/100M/FDx/HDx.
>
> - -Jim H
> - ----
> Jim Howard Sr Network Engineer Lyceum Internet
> jhoward@lyceum.com http://www.lyceum.com/ 404.248.1733
>
> My PGP Public Key: http://www.lyceum.com/~jhoward/pgp-key.txt
> Fingerprint: 7E8B E2BA 1314 2535 CB08 CFF9 119B 7CD3 2488 954D
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: "Troy Settle" <rewt@i-Plus.net>
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 13:35:31 -0400
> Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Limiting Users
>
> From: root <root@ns1.ntrnet.net>
> >Is there a way in RADIUS to allow a user to dialup via modem, make a PPP
> >connection, but not be allowed out to surf the Web. I want to give users
> >extra email boxes for their family, but I want them to only be able to
> >check email. The problem is, that I do not want to force them to use
> >Pine, Elm, or something like that, I want to allow them to use PPP and
> >Eudora if they desire, but do not want to allow them to get to the
> >Internet outside my network since it is supposed to be just a email
> >account?
>
> I'm set up with 2 groups, 'dialup' and 'inet'. Members of the dialup group
> have full access to our network services while the members of inet can do
> everything but connect through our term servers. I have hacked radiusd to
> deny access based on the user's gid -- was a fairly simple hack.
>
> When we sell an email only or shell only account, they are on their own for
> getting connected to the internet. (some have other accounts with us, some
> do not).
>
> - --
> Troy Settle
> Network Administrator, iPlus Internet Services
> http://www.i-Plus.net
>
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: John-David Childs <jdc@denver.net>
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 11:33:42 -0600
> Subject: Re: (ASCEND) ZOOM 56K V1.0 Flash
>
> I believe Karl Deninger at MCSNet has a beta version of the V1.0 FLASH
> ROM at ftp://ftp.mcs.net/zoom-flasher/k56ldrc1.zip (el-drc-one)
>
> On Thursday August 1997, Darkshot <darkshot@chudys.com>
> had this to say about "Re: (ASCEND) ZOOM 56K V1.0 Flash":
>
> > Dave Berzins wrote:
> > >
> > > Does anyone have a beta copy of the V1.0 K56Flex FLASH ROM update for a
> > > ZOOM modem? I can't seem to find it on their site, and their technical
> > > support people are not much help so? Anyone? Anyone?
> > >
> > > Dave...
> > >
> >
> > We've been on the phone with Zoom weekly trying to get something
> > from them on this issue. We always talk to the same overworked
> > tech, so I dunno what the heck is going on at zoomtel.
> >
> > Last word was Real Soon Now.
> >
> > On the other hand, we have a .516 Zoom modem that works great,
> > about an hour a day. Rest of the time it won't connect at all
> > unless K56 is disabled a'la +MS=11
> >
> > The "time it works" varies, too- but unrelated to anything I
> > can put my finger on. We've been playing with it 3 weeks now.
> >
> > But when it DOES work.....it absolutely flies. Go figure. Other
> > Zoom modems with the same software rev do not display this
> > odd behavior.
> >
> > My best guess: "Magic is loose in the world."
> > -Heinlein (Waldo)
> >
> > 'Shot
> >
> > --
> > Darkshot (Michael B. Garrett)
> > <http://www.gloryroad.net>
> > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> > To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> - --
> John-David Childs (JC612) Enterprise Internet Solutions
> System Administrator @denver.net/Internet-Coach/@ronan.net
> & Network Engineer 901 E 17th Ave, Denver 80218
> As of this^H^H^H^H next week, passwords will be entered in Morse code.
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 10:06:22 -0700
> Subject: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap20 for MAX products
>
> At 09:26 AM 8/21/97 +0200, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote:
> >
> > Any known V.FC or V.FAST connects yet ?
> >
> >We have 5.0Ap20 on two MAX 4000 now and don't seem to get either
> >connect to work.
>
> We released this version because we did have some success with V.FC in
> the field trials, so if you do have problems we need more information
> than this....model/version etc.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Kevin
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: "Damon R. Hicks" <damon@iAmerica.net>
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 12:43:08 -0500
> Subject: (ASCEND) Ascend Max 1800
>
> I'm migrating my customers from P50s to Max 1800s. Having difficulty bring up the second channel. I have RTFM. Max Chan set to 2. Trunks to NO. Telco is cleared. No luck. Any ideas? Thank You.>
> Damon
>
> <bold>Damon R. Hicks</bold> LDS iAmerica
>
> damon@iamerica.net Network Operations Center
>
> http://www.arcis.com 724 McNeil St., Suite 500,
>
> (318)425-0001 voice Shreveport, Louisiana 71101
>
> (800)789-6062 x3090 voice & after hours paging
>
> (318)425-0340
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Michael Paul Lucking <michael@traveller.com>
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 12:49:47 -0500 (CDT)
> Subject: (ASCEND) RIP and TNT 1.3Ap5
>
> What in the world did Ascend do to RIP on 1.3Ap5. We are using RIP-2 and
> we were not seeing the TNT send about 50% of its knows routes. We had to
> drop back to 1.3Ap2 and everything works fine again. We saw the problem
> on 1.3A also, but thought it was fixed with p2. Its broken agian in p5.
> Real problem since we can't use the k56Flex modems with p2 (2000%
> increase in disconnects vs. the not k56 modems).
>
> =======================================================================
> Michael Lucking Michael@Traveller.COM
> Systems Administrator Traveller Information Services
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: "David Mulberry" <davidm@binarybus.com>
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 14:12:05 -0400
> Subject: (ASCEND) MAX4000 and Frame Relay
>
> Is it feasable to plug a frame relay T1 (to the internet) strait from the
> CSU/DSU into a MAX and use the MAX as the router? Or is it better practice
> to put a router ( ie cisco) between the MAX and CSU/DSU? Also, if it is
> feasible to plug directly into the MAX does it eat up any resources or slow
> down dial-ups?
>
> What I really want to do is this, T1 to the Internet plugs into Adtran
> CSU/DSU then directly into MAX4000. 2 PRI's plug into MAX4000 to provide
> dial-up and dedicated access. Both the MAX and Local Servers (ie web
> server, mail and radius servers ) plug into hub and MAX4000 acts as a
> gateway as well as a router to the Internet.
>
> If the MAX can not be used this way what router/gateway is recommended for
> the above setup? Or what other equipment would be required?
>
>
> Thanks for any help,
>
> David Mulberry
> "Your ride on the Internet"
> http://www.binarybus.com
>
>
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: djwoods@statestreet.com
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 97 15:09:35 -0400
> Subject: (ASCEND) Entering PPP Mode on MAX
>
> In preperation to upgrading our MAX4000 from 4.6c I have loaded
> 5.0Ap10 on our test MAX. When dialing in via modem I get thrown into
> PPP mode automatically. I want to stay at the command prompt and
> manually enter PPP mode.
>
> Under term serv options I have PPP direct=No.
>
> Is there something else I am missing??
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
>
> Dave Woods
> State Street
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: djwoods@statestreet.com
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 97 15:35:50 -0400
> Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Entering PPP Mode on MAX
>
> Nevermind,
>
> The problem was with the radius profile and not the MAX configuration.
>
> I hate it when I waste time on something simple!!
>
> Thanks anyway
>
> Dave Woods
> State Street
>
>
>
> ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
> Subject: (ASCEND) Entering PPP Mode on MAX
> Author: David J. Woods at svoa0003
> Date: 8/21/97 3:09 PM
>
>
> In preperation to upgrading our MAX4000 from 4.6c I have loaded
> 5.0Ap10 on our test MAX. When dialing in via modem I get thrown into
> PPP mode automatically. I want to stay at the command prompt and
> manually enter PPP mode.
>
> Under term serv options I have PPP direct=No.
>
> Is there something else I am missing??
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
>
> Dave Woods
> State Street
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 12:37:01 -0700
> Subject: (ASCEND) Correction - 1.3Ap5 for MAX TNT
>
> 1.3Ap5 updated release notes have been placed on the FTP server. These
> release notes have been updated to include changes made in the 1.3Ap4 release.
>
> - -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> New features:
>
> * New multishelf management features
> * R2 signaling support for E1
> * Additional hardware tests for SWAN cards
> * V.34 option for 56k modem cards
> * Ascend Tunnel Management Protocol (ATMP) support
>
>
> Corrections:
>
> TR Description
> - ------------------------------------------------
> 2157 The max-call-duration parameter now works for both PPP
> and terminal-server calls.
> 2531 The Netstat command no longer shows T-Online DTPT
> interfaces in domestic loads.
> N/A A progress indication is now provided for Load or Save
> commands.
> N/A Firewall error messages have been fixed.
> N/A Frameline memory is no longer depleted under heavy
> packet traffic.
> N/A RADIUS messages now identify retry attempts.
> N/A Slot -d command now checks shelf numbers correctly
> on multishelf systems.
> N/A Memory corruption in L2/L3 control blocks no longer
> occurs when an ISDN line is disconnected.
> N/A RADIUS accounting START and STOP packets now have
> guaranteed delivery.
> N/A RADIUS dialout routes are now exported properly into OSPF.
> N/A RADIUS reply messages are no longer truncated.
> N/A IP broadcast addresses are no longer cached.
> N/A D4 framing and 56K data service now work on Frameline cards.
>
>
> Rockwell code:
>
> * Release 1.3Ap5 supports Rockwell K56 version 1.054 code with V.FC support.
>
>
> Known problems in 1.3Ap5:
>
> * Occasionally, when migrating to release 1.3Ap5, a system with multiple
> shelves has been seen to have an Ethernet card failure with Error 3001. A
> Reset -f command restores the Ethernet connectivity.
> * If an HDLC mobile client dials in with Stac compression on, the HDLC card
> in the ATMP foreign agent fails with a Fatal 15 error message.
> * The MAX TNT does not yet work as an ATMP home agent in router mode.
>
> - -- Patti
>
>
> Kevin
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Manfred Kwiatkowski <Kwiatkowski@zrz.TU-Berlin.DE>
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 22:12:11 +0200 (MET DST)
> Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Maxen ethernet port fdx or hdx?
>
> Joseph Bridgewater <Joseph@austintx.net> writes:
> >
> > 2) If it is only hdx, what are the implications in using a couple 4000's
> > on a LAN otherwise configured to be full-duplex?
>
> There is no such thing as a full-duplex ethernet LAN. A collection
> of point-to-points links sharing a common layer-2 addressing scheme
> however may be in turn brigded to any half-duplex collision domain.
>
> :-)
>
> - --
> Manfred Kwiatkowski, ZRZ (Zentraleinrichtung Rechenzentrum), Sekr.: EN 50,
> Technische Universitaet Berlin, Einsteinufer 17, D-10587
John M. Cross
Monicus Corp.
"The Clinton Administration
It's Out There!"
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>