Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[4]: (ASCEND) Netware Server/Routed IPX on P75
What eventually worked in this case was setting a static ipx route,
fffffffe 0451 0004. It appears SAP advertisements came through ok.
But the IPX rip overrun could not be compensated for using the
Pipeline's default behavior. Kind of surprising.
-Michael
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Re[2]: (ASCEND) Netware Server/Routed IPX on P75
Author: Dean_Heltemes@cargill.com at Internet
Date: 8/14/97 9:22 PM
Then what I outlined below is the problem you are experiencing.
We ran into this limitation a few months ago. Depending on your
network layout and how and where you filter SAP traffic, the SAP
Proxy feature may work for you. Take a look at the release
notes. Otherwise stick with bridging.
Dean Heltemes
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re[2]: (ASCEND) Netware Server/Routed IPX on P75
Author: MMedwid (MMedwid@symantec.com) at hdqt-unix-mime
Date: 8/14/97 6:44 PM
Yes - we have over 300 Netware servers on the network.
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Netware Server/Routed IPX on P75
Author: Dean_Heltemes@cargill.com at Internet
Date: 8/14/97 2:32 PM
Do you have more than 300 NetWare servers on your network? If so, the
Pipeline can only hold 300 SAP entries and 300 IPX routes. If the
routes for those six servers don't happen to fall within the first
300, that's your problem.
You could also try the SAP Proxy feature, depending on your network
layout.
Dean Heltemes
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: (ASCEND) Netware Server/Routed IPX on P75
Author: owner-ascend-users (owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com) at hdqt-unix-mime
Date: 8/13/97 7:15 PM
When using bridging on the Pipeline 75, I can get to any netware
server - attach, browse, download, upload. No problem. But since we
changed to the IPX routing, I have found about six Netware server
(bindery) that I can not attach to nor browse volumes. I can
attach/log on to any other server on our network. I get an error
message "An attempt made to establish session to a network server
failed. Possibly a problem of not enough available connections." I
checked nlist and there are always at least 50 available connections.
Plus if I go to a P75 with the bridged config, I can attach etc no
problem to any server.
Any ideas?
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Received: from Mailer.symantec.com (198.6.49.5) by smtp-ima.symantec.com with
SMTP
(IMA Internet Exchange 2.1 Enterprise) id 0009FF24; Thu, 14 Aug 97 12:38:15
-0700
Received: from cargill.com (charon.cargill.com [167.136.225.225]) by
Mailer.symantec.com (8.8.4/8.7.6) with ESMTP id MAA21005 for
<MMedwid@symantec.com>; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 12:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dean_Heltemes@cargill.com
Received: (from root@localhost) by cargill.com (8.8.2/8.8.0) id OAA22066; Thu,
14 Aug 1997 14:33:37 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from hdqt.cargill.com(157.239.110.12) by charon.cargill.com via smap
(V1.3mjr)
id sma021965; Thu Aug 14 13:32:44 1997
Received: from by hdqt.cargill.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.20/16.2) id AA269227163; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 14:32:43 -0500
X-Openmail-Hops: 1
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 97 14:32:15 -0500
Message-Id: <H000072718ff9377@MHS>
In-Reply-To: <0009D710.3152@symantec.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Netware Server/Routed IPX on P75
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: MMedwid@symantec.com, owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="(ASCEND)"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received: from Mailer.symantec.com (198.6.49.5) by smtp-ima.symantec.com with
SMTP
(IMA Internet Exchange 2.1 Enterprise) id 000A15CB; Thu, 14 Aug 97 20:47:37
-0700
Received: from max.bungi.com (max.bungi.com [207.126.97.7]) by
Mailer.symantec.com (8.8.4/8.7.6) with SMTP id UAA00887 for
<MMedwid@symantec.com>; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 20:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by max.bungi.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) id TAA16331
for ascend-users-outgoing; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 19:24:40 -0700
Received: from daver.bungi.com (daver.bungi.com [207.126.97.2]) by max.bungi.com
(8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id TAA16326 for <ascend-users@max.bungi.com>; Thu, 14
Aug 1997 19:24:35 -0700
From: Dean_Heltemes@cargill.com
Received: from cargill.com(really [167.136.225.225]) by daver.bungi.com
via sendmail with esmtp
id <m0wzC3W-0001noC@daver.bungi.com>
for <ascend-users@bungi.com>; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 19:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
(Smail-3.2.0.94 1997-Apr-22 #8 built 1997-Jun-19)
Received: (from root@localhost) by cargill.com (8.8.2/8.8.0) id VAA11471; Thu,
14 Aug 1997 21:23:48 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from hdqt.cargill.com(157.239.110.12) by charon.cargill.com via smap
(V1.3mjr)
id sma011435; Thu Aug 14 20:23:30 1997
Received: from by hdqt.cargill.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.20/16.2) id AA110311809; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 21:23:29 -0500
X-Openmail-Hops: 1
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 97 21:22:46 -0500
Message-Id: <H00007271903fb61@MHS>
In-Reply-To: <000A0BB5.3152@symantec.com>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: (ASCEND) Netware Server/Routed IPX on P75
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: MMedwid@symantec.com, ascend-users@bungi.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="openmail-part-1903f5d1-00000001"
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com
Precedence: bulk