Re: (ASCEND) Low bit/high bit subnets

To: Dave Van Allen <dave@fast.net>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Low bit/high bit subnets
From: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 19:32:36 -0400 (EDT)
cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 11 Aug 1997 16:47:58 EDT." <c=US%a=_%p=You_Tools_Corp.%l=FNBDC1-970811204758Z-3144@fnbdc1.youtools.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

> Cisco?  Told you to be afraid of this?
> 
> Cisco specifically implements ip subnet zero as an IOS command and has
> for a while now.  This command not only works well with any thing else
> that respects the difference between non natural masks on classless
> boundaries, but is scheduled to be enabled by default in upcoming
> releases of IOS. 

Yeah, I know, that's why I said it was crap :-)

Yet that's what the guy told me.

As far as I'm concerned, "ip classless" and "ip subnet-zero" should be the
defaults though, so it's still not perfect!

-Phil
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

RE: (ASCEND) Low bit/high bit subnets

From: Dave Van Allen <dave@fast.net>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) JBPC Release 5.0Ai2
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Low bit/high bit subnets
Prev by thread: RE: (ASCEND) Low bit/high bit subnets
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Low bit/high bit subnets
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread