Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: (ASCEND) V.110 connect times
We have a difference depending on authentication method, both faster
than for V.34 users.
A Nokia 9000 with ATS35=0 to make it use ISDN calling a MAX 2000 5.0Ap16
with V.110 modem card:-
Using a local profile, CLID authentication: 6 seconds from receiving
the call to LAN session up.
Using a RADIUS profile, CLID authentication: 15 seconds until LAN
session up.
After many calls to Ascend help desk this strange behaviour has been
duplicated but not fixed. (I have not tried the Incremental tree or
anything older than V5.0Ap11)
philip
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ales.pronet@eunet.si [SMTP:ales.pronet@eunet.si]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 1997 2:32 PM
> To: ascend-users@bungi.com
> Subject: (ASCEND) V.110 connect times
>
> Hi,
>
> We have noticed that there is no difference in time to get connected
> to
> Max (Lan session up) for a GSM users (Nokia9000), if they use V.110
> or
> V.34 encapsulations/negotiations.
> Is that true that V.110 users have to connect faster then V.34 users.
>
> ales
>
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to
> ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups: