I have used both ipfire and pfsense. I agree the pfsense has a more limited feature set. Ipfire seemed to want to be the center of the network with all the add-on it had for stuff that shouldn't be on a router. I went to pfsense to get ipv6 working (not that I have used it yet). Joseph On 4/17/2020 2:20 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: >> I've played with pfSense, and it's OK, but limited in its feature set. > Limited in what manner? I run many businesses in the Twin Cities on > pfSense and have multiple MAN configurations going. > > — > Ryan > >> On Apr 17, 2020, at 8:51 AM, Brian Wall <kc0iog at gmail.com >> <mailto:kc0iog at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >> I've played with pfSense, and it's OK, but limited in its feature >> set. I really like Untangle, but it insistently demands 6GB of RAM >> and not 1MB less. This box is finicky enough that I don't really >> have the desire to find enough RAM and make the box happy about it. > > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20200418/54c4d73d/attachment.htm>