I learned this when an opensuse install disk refused to install. A "media check" in the configuration tool YAST declared the disc sha256 wrong. So opensuse implemented the protection mechanism without me aware of any of it. Again, surprised by the professionalism. The other two mentions: Detroit Public TV documentary "The Ethanol Effect," and Stanford University "Center for Quantum Molecular Design (CQMD)" pertain to advancing "Green Energy" technology. CQMD is developing computer modeling that some of your associates might be aware of. When we discussed this before, you got close to some science. But I believe this Stanford group is spot on. This research field has become a global race. My frustration is actually doing sweaty grunt preliminaries. We are buried in advanced biomass potential in Minnesota. The ridiculous city politicos say all we gotta do is have some new expensive "policy." Hopefully, someone Googles the two references provided. Iznogoud wrote: > Most if not all distributions of Linux (and other software thingies) publish > checksums (MD5, SHA) for individual packages and other things for the sole > purpose of avoiding injections of mallicious software in their distribution. > The chain of trust, of course, heavily relies on how the checksums are > published (on web-pages), which inevitably turns to HTTPS and the idea of > website certification. > > Yes, these things are mostly unspoken and ignore by downloaders -- including > the guy typing this message. > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >