That's an option I will consider as well. However the bandwidth for the base business class is less than the residential. Also going with a VPS provider, it seems that the hardware is automatically upgraded over time, where using business class I'd need my own hardware. On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 8:34 PM Clug <tclug at freakzilla.com> wrote: > I don't know if this is an option for you, but Comcast Business will > happily sell you bandwidth, give you static IPs and allow you to run your > own servers. It's not that much more expensive than non-business and > actually has a support department that knows what they're doing. > > On Sun, 16 Dec 2018, Jon Schewe wrote: > > > I've been hosting a server running mail, website, photo gallery, shell > > access, as a VM with a friend's business for some time. Things are > changing > > and I need to find a new place to host the "server". 15 years ago I > would > > have had a physical server co-located at an ISP. These days having a > > virtual server seems the way to go. > > > > I've started looking at Amazon, Linode and Digital Ocean. It looks like > > Amazon and Digital Ocean are the best deal, but I'd like to hear from > > others. Note that I'm not looking at a site like BlueHost or other web > > hosting companies because I would like to maintain shell access and be > able > > to run long running processes like Jenkins. > > > > Does anyone here have experience with a for this kind of hosting? Do you > > have a recommendation? > > > > Thank you > > Jon > > > > -- > > http://mtu.net/~jpschewe > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > -- http://mtu.net/~jpschewe -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20181217/1f86a218/attachment.html>