Agreed. I've used CruiseControl, Hudson, and Bamboo. Hudson surpassed CruiseControl in many ways. I wouldn't want to use CC again unless I had to. I encountered a number of CC problems related to when they tried to make it multi-threaded (buggy). When I contributed a feature, I saw how the code was just a mess... On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Brady Hegberg <bradyh at bitstream.net> wrote: > I've used both Hudson and CruiseControl. Hudson seems to be easier to configure and more flexible - definitely worth a try. My impression is that both packages have approximately the same capabilities but the Hudson project has done more work on the interface. > > -Brady > > On Feb 22, 2011, at 12:56 PM, dutchman_mn at charter.net wrote: > >> I have been using Hudson (have not moved to Jenkins yet) successfully on a number of projects. It has lots of bells and whistles including a Mecurial plugin (http://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Mercurial+Plugin) though I have not run into a client using Mecurial yet (SVN mostly). >> >> Perry >> >> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:43 PM, John Gateley wrote: >> >>> Does anyone use CruiseControl or another alternative? We are using >>> and it is not working well, especially the web interface. This would >>> be for linux or solaris, so .NET is not a factor. It should support >>> Mercurial for the source code control system. >>> >>> Any thoughts? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> John >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >>> tclug-list at mn-linux.org >>> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >> _______________________________________________ >> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >> tclug-list at mn-linux.org >> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > >