Firefox 4 90%, Chrome 10%. I've found Chrome to be more stable on a couple of sites I rarely use, hence the 10%. For awhile it was flopped the other way, but I've liked FF 4 more since it was beta. I couldn't justify using just one, neither would work for me 100% of the time. -- Jeremy MountainJohnson jeremy.mountainjohnson at gmail.com On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Brian Wood <woodbrian77 at gmail.com> wrote: > I've been using Firefox 3.6.13 and have recently started using Chrome > after using Chrome once previously. One frequently encountered > scrolling-related bug I was having with Firefox went away with Chrome. > One reason I decided to take another look at Chrome was my browsing > tends to use a lot of my resources. Firefox seems to be multi-threaded > as the top program gives a one liner for Firefox that makes it easy to > tell how much resource it is using. Chrome though seems to use a > separate process for each tab and that makes it a pain to compare how > much resource it is using to do the same thing I was doing with Firefox. > There's another aspect to Chrome I like so don't really think I'll go back > to Firefox soon, but I'm not really sure if Chrome is using less resources > than Firefox. I also recall hearing about an upcoming Firefox release > that will be more efficient than previous Firefox releases. Thanks in > advance. > -- > Brian Wood > Ebenezer Enterprises > http://webEbenezer.net > (651) 251-9384 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > >