Yeah, well, like what happened with Ben earlier. I'm fairly sure he meant to send it to the list, but messed up. If he didn't mean to, he should let me know, and I'll apologize. The argument against the Reply-To header is weak. I'd bet money that the number of people who are replying to the full list outweigh the number of people who are replying to the poster. -Adam On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 10:04:32AM -0600, Mike Miller wrote: > On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Adam Morris wrote: > > >> Plus we're geared towards occasionally helping people, and occasionally > >> these people are newbies. No problem, but quite often I get replies to > >> my reply that come directly to ME rather than to the list. > >> > >> I think it'd be helpful for a lot of new users that our list had > >> standard mailing list behavior. > > > > I realize I'm relatively new to this list, and I've been kind of lurking > > lately, but I agree. Not all mail clients have a reply list > > functionality. Yes, we can be condescending pricks and tell them to go > > get a "real" mail client, but that's a load of BS in my opinion. > > > I think we should have the list do "Reply-To" because (1) I often get > replies sent to me and not to the list when they were clearly meant for > the list -- that happens more on this list than elsewhere, and (2) I'm > used to lists that use "Reply-To" so that the keystrokes I'm used to > performing will send my message "to all" on TCLUG instead of just to the > list (what I want). The argument against fixing this seems pretty weak to > me. > > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list