On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 08:10:58PM -0600, Florin Iucha wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 07:29:16PM -0600, Yaron wrote:
> > Hey, can we make it so emails to this list hve a reply-to that actually
> > goes to the list? Rather than to the original sender? I know it's been
> > brought up before, but I'd like to bring it up again! (:
>
> ... and can we also have the list spell-check the messages before they
> are sent out to all the members?
>
> Or, can the mailing list manager sniff out the user agent and notify
> the subscribers of the availability of free and improved MUAs? For
> instance Mutt has as default key-bindings:
> 'r' reply to sender
> 'L' reply to list
> It works quite well. You can also set it to use VI as the editor...
Personally I need a mailing list manager that rejects messages which
have too low a pH level. The message above was unnecessarily
inflammatory and unhelpful.
If I may try again:
Yaron,
What you need is to look back through the archives and find out why
the situation is what it is, and if your argument has been discussed
before, and if it was, why it was rejected or disconsidered. Then, if
you have new supporting arguments, enumerate them. After they are
considered and suitably discussed, ask for a vote.
Best,
florin
--
Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition.
http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100301/587ba7f6/attachment.pgp