From chris at cb1inc.com Mon Feb 1 03:17:36 2010 From: chris at cb1inc.com (Chris Barber) Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:17:36 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Ray Stepping? In-Reply-To: <4B666C49.3060501@gmail.com> References: <4B666C49.3060501@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B669C30.1040602@cb1inc.com> Do you mean ray marching? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volume_ray_casting * * On 1/31/10 11:53 PM, Ryan Hanson wrote: > To the people who went to the penguins unbound thingy on Saturday. > I'm trying to figure out the other alternative to Ray Tracing that used > stepping. > > I tried searching for Ray Stepping but I didn't find anything. > > Any help? > > Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100201/d8083579/attachment.htm From nesius at gmail.com Mon Feb 1 09:59:18 2010 From: nesius at gmail.com (Robert Nesius) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:59:18 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Ray Stepping? In-Reply-To: <4B669C30.1040602@cb1inc.com> References: <4B666C49.3060501@gmail.com> <4B669C30.1040602@cb1inc.com> Message-ID: Perhaps he really is looking for Ray Casting (in the context of surfaces, versus volumes) if he's looking for an alternative to Ray Tracing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_casting Excerpt: Ray casting is not a synonym for ray tracing, but can be thought of as an abridged, and significantly faster, version of the ray tracing algorithm. Both are image orderalgorithms used in computer graphics to renderthree dimensional scenes to two dimensional screens by following rays of lightfrom the eye of the observer to a light source. Ray casting does not compute the new direction a ray of light might take after intersecting a surface on its way from the eye to the source of light. This eliminates the possibility of accurately rendering reflections , refractions , or the natural falloff of shadows ; however all of these elements can be faked to a degree, by creative use of texturemaps or other methods. The high speed of calculation made ray casting a handy rendering method in early real-time 3D video games. -Rob On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:17 AM, Chris Barber wrote: > Do you mean ray marching? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volume_ray_casting > > * > > * > On 1/31/10 11:53 PM, Ryan Hanson wrote: > > To the people who went to the penguins unbound thingy on Saturday. > I'm trying to figure out the other alternative to Ray Tracing that used > stepping. > > I tried searching for Ray Stepping but I didn't find anything. > > Any help? > > Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesotatclug-list at mn-linux.orghttp://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100201/3c91b2fe/attachment.htm From jhsu802701 at jasonhsu.com Mon Feb 1 12:58:17 2010 From: jhsu802701 at jasonhsu.com (Jason Hsu, Linux user) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 12:58:17 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] antiX Linux Message-ID: <20100201125817.0258b1ad.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> It was great to meet so many of you at the Penguins Unbound meeting on Saturday. Check out my Linux page at http://www.jasonhsu.com/linux.html . I have included instructions for installing and configuring antiX Linux and other distros. As I mentioned there, antiX Linux is now my main distro. It should be its own distro instead of just another version of MEPIS. It should be one of the top ten distros. Here are the reasons I like it: 1. Like Puppy Linux and unlike Debian and Ubuntu, antiX installs in just a few minutes. Debian takes a long time to install - as long as Windows does. Of course, the time you need to install Debian depends on the speed of your Internet connection. 2. Like Puppy Linux and unlike Ubuntu, antiX is lightweight and fast. Even on an 11-year old laptop (what we're using for an IEEE study group called Project Phoenix) with only 256 MB of RAM and a 500 MHz processor, antiX is fast. The very same computer struggled with Windows XP and the full Ubuntu and Xubuntu installations. (This computer originally had Windows 98, was "upgraded" to Windows 2000, and "upgraded" again to Windows XP. When people talk about "upgrading" an OS, they sure aren't referring to speed.) 3. Like Puppy Linux and unlike Debian, antiX is user-friendly. Using Puppy Linux has really spoiled me, as it conditioned me to expect all other distros to install and run quickly and be user-friendly. I might get hate mail from Debian fans, but I find Debian to be too difficult to configure properly. I have also tried a minimal Ubuntu installation (start off with the command-line installation and add packages), but it's not as user-friendly as the full installation. I just never liked the idea of having to download a package just to be able to shut down properly, and I like the idea of having all the basic stuff up and running quickly. 4. Unlike Puppy Linux, antiX Linux is compatible with the Debian repository. Puppy Linux is working on compatibility with the Debian repository, but it's not ready for prime time. Right now, Puppy Linux is great for the average person on the street but not for those who need the more specialized applications (like programming microcontrollers) that only the larger repositories provide. antiX Linux is the lightest and most user-friendly distro with Debian repository compatibility. In other words, antiX Linux is the best of both worlds - the speed and ease of use of Puppy Linux but with the superior repository of Debian/Ubuntu. I recommend antiX Linux for the following groups: 1. Those on old, power-challenged computers who need something lightweight but also need specialized software packages 2. Ubuntu users using marginal computers: Ubuntu has a history of putting more bloat into its newer versions while terminating support for its older versions. As a result, many users get cut off, because their computers can't cut the mustard. Ubuntu has its merits, but operation on older, less powerful computers is not one of them. I wouldn't recommend Ubuntu for those with under 512 MB of RAM. I bet that in a few short years, even 1 GB of RAM will be marginal for Ubuntu. 3. Those who can't configure Debian but don't have enough RAM and processor speed for fast Ubuntu operation. -- Jason Hsu, Linux user From hansonry at gmail.com Mon Feb 1 19:58:44 2010 From: hansonry at gmail.com (Ryan Hanson) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 19:58:44 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Ray Stepping? In-Reply-To: References: <4B666C49.3060501@gmail.com> <4B669C30.1040602@cb1inc.com> Message-ID: Thanks for the quick replies! Sadly its not ray casting or ray tracing. Ray Marching sounds close to what I was looking for. Although the wiki entry said it was a slow technique, and, as I understand it, it can be done in real time. Ill look more into the ray marching thing. Thanks again! ~Ryan On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Robert Nesius wrote: > Perhaps he really is looking for Ray Casting (in the context of surfaces, > versus volumes) if he's looking for an alternative to Ray Tracing. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_casting > > Excerpt: > Ray casting is not a synonym for ray tracing, but can be thought of as an > abridged, and significantly faster, version of the ray tracing algorithm. > Both are image order algorithms used in computer graphics to render three > dimensional scenes to two dimensional screens by following rays of light > from the eye of the observer to a light source. Ray casting does not compute > the new direction a ray of light might take after intersecting a surface on > its way from the eye to the source of light. This eliminates the possibility > of accurately rendering reflections, refractions, or the natural falloff of > shadows; however all of these elements can be faked to a degree, by creative > use of texture maps or other methods. The high speed of calculation made ray > casting a handy rendering method in early real-time 3D video games. > > > -Rob > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:17 AM, Chris Barber wrote: >> >> Do you mean ray marching? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volume_ray_casting >> >> >> On 1/31/10 11:53 PM, Ryan Hanson wrote: >> >> To the people who went to the penguins unbound thingy on Saturday. >> I'm trying to figure out the other alternative to Ray Tracing that used >> stepping. >> >> I tried searching for Ray Stepping but I didn't find anything. >> >> Any help? >> >> Thanks >> >> _______________________________________________ >> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >> tclug-list at mn-linux.org >> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >> tclug-list at mn-linux.org >> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >> > > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > From dniesen at gmail.com Tue Feb 2 08:51:22 2010 From: dniesen at gmail.com (Donovan) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:51:22 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Internal mail server w/ webmail and LDAP/AD authentication Message-ID: <47f4d5e71002020651r7a2e015eq8b940490d3a66468@mail.gmail.com> I'm looking to set up a mail server for internal use only with a webmail interface. I'm setting this up in an Active Directory environment so having LDAP/AD authentication would be ideal. A simple setup/configuration would be great but configuring a few packages to work together for this solution would be fine, too. AtMail's commercial offering looked like a nice offering but a little pricey (starting at $500) when I'd be surprised if I couldn't get the job done with open source tools. Is there anybody using anything or know of anything I should check out? Thanks! -- Donovan Niesen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100202/a920bfc4/attachment.htm From ryanjcole at me.com Tue Feb 2 08:57:49 2010 From: ryanjcole at me.com (Ryan Coleman) Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:57:49 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Internal mail server w/ webmail and LDAP/AD authentication In-Reply-To: <47f4d5e71002020651r7a2e015eq8b940490d3a66468@mail.gmail.com> References: <47f4d5e71002020651r7a2e015eq8b940490d3a66468@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B683D6D.8020905@me.com> Do you have a throwaway computer? A Linux distribution with Postfix, Apache, PHP and Squirrelmail would probably be right up your alley. I have all 4 but not running through LDAP-AD. And AD isn't that difficult to authenticate against (doing it on intranet web login at my day job). Donovan wrote: > I'm looking to set up a mail server for internal use only with a > webmail interface. I'm setting this up in an Active Directory > environment so having LDAP/AD authentication would be ideal. > > A simple setup/configuration would be great but configuring a few > packages to work together for this solution would be fine, too. > AtMail's commercial offering looked like a nice offering but a little > pricey (starting at $500) when I'd be surprised if I couldn't get the > job done with open source tools. > > Is there anybody using anything or know of anything I should check out? > > Thanks! > > -- > Donovan Niesen > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > From mkebob1134 at netscape.net Tue Feb 2 09:17:26 2010 From: mkebob1134 at netscape.net (Mr. B-o-B) Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:17:26 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Internal mail server w/ webmail and LDAP/AD authentication In-Reply-To: <47f4d5e71002020651r7a2e015eq8b940490d3a66468@mail.gmail.com> References: <47f4d5e71002020651r7a2e015eq8b940490d3a66468@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B684206.9070006@netscape.net> On 2/2/2010 8:51 AM, Donovan wrote: > I'm looking to set up a mail server for internal use only with a webmail > interface. I'm setting this up in an Active Directory environment so > having LDAP/AD authentication would be ideal. Most mail servers can be setup to Auth using ldap/AD. There are tons of docs available depending upon your flavor of mail server. In the past I have used the full blown www.courrier-mta.org mta server, and setup the AUTH to our AD using LDAP. It also has a nice webmail included. I have also setup postfix to Auth against AD/LDAP, with either courier imap or dovecoat imap (courier imap using ldap & dovecoat using the built in NTLM). And on top of this I have been happy with www.zarafa.com webmail features. Zarafa looks & feels like Exchange OWA, but works well on all browsers. I like it. Bottom line is most(if not all) Linux mail server setups can auth using ldap against AD (with a little tinkering). If you unfamiliar with ldap & ad there is a lot of basic info in the web that will help you with the basic minimum to help you get on your way. I think another approach to this (although I have never tried myself) would be using Sambas winbind/Pam-based auth technique on the mail server box, then auth the mail users that way. This could be a can of worms left unopened, but thought I'd mention it. Good Luck. B-o-B > > A simple setup/configuration would be great but configuring a few > packages to work together for this solution would be fine, too. > AtMail's commercial offering looked like a nice offering but a little > pricey (starting at $500) when I'd be surprised if I couldn't get the > job done with open source tools. > > Is there anybody using anything or know of anything I should check out? > > Thanks! > > -- > Donovan Niesen > > > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list From kelly.black at penguinpackets.com Tue Feb 2 10:52:26 2010 From: kelly.black at penguinpackets.com (kelly) Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:52:26 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Internal mail server w/ webmail and LDAP/AD authentication References: <47f4d5e71002020651r7a2e015eq8b940490d3a66468@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <0000091071@mail.penguinpackets.com> ? > Tue Feb 02 2010 08:51:22 AM CST from "Donovan" >Subject: [tclug-list] Internal mail server w/ webmail and LDAP/AD >authentication > > I'm looking to set up a mail server for internal use only with a webmail >interface. ?I'm setting this up in an Active Directory environment so having >LDAP/AD authentication would be ideal. > > > > > > > > I have not tried the AD / LDAP integration, but Citadel seems to filt the >bill? - citadel.org > > Debian packages (although I just install the dependant libs and do a >scripted easy installer that builds everything for you and allows you to keep >up to date with mainline releases quickly).? Web interface (with some >groupware functionality), as well as AD authentication.? I belive they also >have a vm build that you can just kick the tires with (although I am not sure >how old it is). > > > > > The "easy install" is here (just get the deps and lib packages first).. > > > >http://www.citadel.org/doku.php/installation:easyinstall:easyinstall?s=easy > > > > > > Auth modes supported are explained here: > > > http://www.citadel.org/doku.php/faq:installation:authmodes?s=ldap > > > > > But wait!? Thats not all!? You also get discussion areas (which can be >subscribed to as a mailing list), a Wiki, an XMPP server, and the ability to >share content between Citadel nodes. > > > > > I know that last bit was not what you were asking, but it makes up for the >the design of the web interface :-) > > > > > Kelly > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100202/5f4b355c/attachment.htm -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: Url: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100202/5f4b355c/attachment.txt From andyzib at gmail.com Tue Feb 2 12:11:58 2010 From: andyzib at gmail.com (Andrew S. Zbikowski) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:11:58 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Internal mail server w/ webmail and LDAP/AD authentication In-Reply-To: <0000091071@mail.penguinpackets.com> References: <47f4d5e71002020651r7a2e015eq8b940490d3a66468@mail.gmail.com> <0000091071@mail.penguinpackets.com> Message-ID: As long as your daemons are PAM aware, winbind and PAM makes configuring AD authentication easy. You'll have to install and configure Samba, join the domain, test, edit nssswitch.conf and the PAM configuration files for your daemons, and you should be off and running. Also worth looking into is the Kerberized versions of your daemons. When you do all of the above you're setting up Kerberos authentication anyway, so the next logical step is to add Kerberized services and get full SSO authentication. You'll typically have to add the SPNs to AD using ADSI Edit or the setspn command line tool on windows to get your Kerberized services to work. If you won't be using Kerberized daemons, you should implement a SSL/TLS only policy on any services using AD authentication. (HTTP, IMAP, POP3, SMTP) -- Andrew S. Zbikowski | http://andy.zibnet.us IT Outhouse Blog Thing | http://www.itouthouse.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100202/ab4f2805/attachment.htm From andyzib at gmail.com Tue Feb 2 12:15:57 2010 From: andyzib at gmail.com (Andrew S. Zbikowski) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:15:57 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Internal mail server w/ webmail and LDAP/AD authentication In-Reply-To: References: <47f4d5e71002020651r7a2e015eq8b940490d3a66468@mail.gmail.com> <0000091071@mail.penguinpackets.com> Message-ID: Forgot to mention: Read Chapter 6, 24, 28 and 29 in the Offical Samba HOWTO collection. That should cover everything I mentioned in my previous email. :) http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/ -- Andrew S. Zbikowski | http://andy.zibnet.us IT Outhouse Blog Thing | http://www.itouthouse.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100202/c24f1301/attachment.htm From nesius at gmail.com Tue Feb 2 12:43:50 2010 From: nesius at gmail.com (Robert Nesius) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:43:50 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Internal mail server w/ webmail and LDAP/AD authentication In-Reply-To: References: <47f4d5e71002020651r7a2e015eq8b940490d3a66468@mail.gmail.com> <0000091071@mail.penguinpackets.com> Message-ID: There's also the Open Likewise libraries/tool-chains for AD integration. -Rob On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Andrew S. Zbikowski wrote: > Forgot to mention: > > Read Chapter 6, 24, 28 and 29 in the Offical Samba HOWTO collection. That > should cover everything I mentioned in my previous email. :) > > http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/ > > > -- > Andrew S. Zbikowski | http://andy.zibnet.us > IT Outhouse Blog Thing | http://www.itouthouse.com > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100202/592e6e77/attachment.htm From jhsu802701 at jasonhsu.com Tue Feb 2 21:42:00 2010 From: jhsu802701 at jasonhsu.com (Jason Hsu, Linux user) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 21:42:00 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? Message-ID: <20100202214200.005d4dcb.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> When, why, and how did you start using Linux? I started using Linux 3 years ago. The reasons I started using Linux were: 1. I had heard about how Windows was full of security holes. It also seemed that security threats only grew over time. 2. I had heard that support for Windows 98 (my main OS at the time) was about to be terminated and that this was even more vulnerable to security threats than Windows XP. I wasn't about to "upgrade" my main computer from Windows 98 due to the expense and trouble of doing so. 3. I heard that Windows Vista was nasty - a quantum leap forward in bloatware that was slow even on many NEW computers. I also heard that Vista didn't work with many items of older hardware like printers, scanners, etc. 4. I'm cheap. My attitude towards computers can be summed up by, "If it ain't broke, don't replace it." I didn't think Windows XP was that much better than 98 or 98 that much better than 95. But I noticed that it took more RAM, hard drive space, processor power, etc. to do exactly the same things we had done 10 years earlier. At the same time, I noticed that there weren't many killer apps (like the Internet in the 1990s), so I felt that we should be able to keep using the same computer for 5-10 years. 5. I'm green. I thought it was scandalous that so many computers get trashed each year NOT because some critical component failed but because the OS failed or was declared obsolete. To me, the only good reason to get rid of a computer is because it breaks and cannot be repaired. So I bought a used IBM NetVista desktop computer (256 MB of RAM, 1 GHz processor, 20 GB hard drive, built in 2001, originally equipped with Windows 2000, which had been removed for sale) for $50 from a local used computer dealer. I also bought a KVM switch so I could switch between the older computer and the newer one. I used this newer used computer for going online and used the old computer with Windows 98 strictly offline. (I still have and use this old computer, which I bought new in 2000. It had a 466 MHz processor and a 4.3 GB hard drive. It originally had just 128 MB of RAM, but I upgraded it to 384 MB of RAM. I just recently replaced the Windows 98 setup with Linux.) Over the last 3 years, I have been doing more and more stuff in Linux and less and less in Windows. My first distro was Fedora Core 1, because the CD came with the book _Linux For Non-Geeks_. Then I used Damn Small Linux, Puppy Linux, and Ubuntu. (I dabbled with Debian but couldn't get it configured properly.) I recently switched to antiX Linux. As I mentioned before, it's the most lightweight and user-friendly distro with more than 20,000 programs in the repository due to the Debian repository compatibility. It's the best of both worlds. -- Jason Hsu, Linux user From jhsu802701 at jasonhsu.com Tue Feb 2 22:00:00 2010 From: jhsu802701 at jasonhsu.com (Jason Hsu, Linux user) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 22:00:00 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Why I recommend Puppy Linux for a first distro Message-ID: <20100202220000.6f4707a8.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> I recommend Puppy Linux for a newbie's first distro. My reasons: 1. It's user-friendly. As I found when I tried Debian, Puppy Linux is so user-friendly that it spoiled me into expecting other distros to be as easy to use. My only gripe is that even the single-boot installation process requires manually editing the menu.lst file when all of the other distros I've tried took care of that automatically. This is the one area where Puppy Linux could learn from antiX Linux. 2. It installs in just a few minutes. On the other hand, Fedora Core 1, Debian, and Ubuntu take a long time to install. 3. It's lightweight - runs entirely from RAM on only 256 MB. The only lighter distro I've used is Damn Small Linux. I think Damn Small Linux skimps on many things in order to limit its size to 50 MB. In DSL, I could only get Flash 7 to work, and that required a rather complex installation procedure. Flash 9 was so unstable that the browser crashed within a few seconds. I also found the printer installation process to be difficult and unintuitive. I think 256 MB is marginal for Ubuntu. Starting off with a command-line installation and adding packages allows for a more lightweight operation, but then Ubuntu isn't as user-friendly. Ubuntu's hardware requirements keep escalating, and the earlier and lighter versions keep getting terminated, so a group of low-end users get cut off each year. You can probably forget about running the latest version of Fedora with only 256 MB of RAM. 4. If you don't need any specialized applications, Puppy Linux's small repository isn't an issue. For the average person on the street (who just does web browsing, email, word processing, spreadsheets, and presentations), Puppy Linux is perfect. That said, Puppy Linux is working on Debian compatibility. I'd love to see a rivalry between Puppy Linux and antiX Linux, as the users of both as well as others using old computers would all win, and only Microsoft would lose. -- Jason Hsu, Linux user From kris.browne at gmail.com Wed Feb 3 00:40:58 2010 From: kris.browne at gmail.com (Kris Browne) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 00:40:58 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: <20100202214200.005d4dcb.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> References: <20100202214200.005d4dcb.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> Message-ID: <8255989d1002022240n1bc49390oc741ee0eabb3d662@mail.gmail.com> When, why, and how did you start using Linux? Wow... Let's see here. I know when I started using Linux Slackware 1 was current, so that puts it around 1993. At the time, I was looking for something with more current development than the Minix I had been using before that. Minix had spoiled me with virtual consoles, command line completion, and a ton of other things which DOS couldn't even think to deliver at the time. However, Andy Tanenbaum famously had no desire to expand it to a general purpose system. BSD was still shackled by ATT, so Linux became the next logical choice. Around 1994 I was hosting a BBS. Desqview was a royal pain to use, and there were no other real useful DOS mutltaskers. In the end, I ran DOSemu on top of Linux to host multiple nodes of my BBS, which ended up using less overhead and provided better performance than Deskview did. For the past nearly 20 years, my desktop systems have been almost exclusively Unix systems of some sort, and most of that has been on Slackware or some other Linux flavor. Kris Browne kris.browne at gmail.com 612-353-6969 612-408-4431 http://www.google.com/profiles/kris.browne "the least expensive, most bug-free line of code is the one you didn't have to write." - Steve Jobs On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 21:42, Jason Hsu, Linux user wrote: > When, why, and how did you start using Linux? > > I started using Linux 3 years ago. The reasons I started using Linux were: > 1. I had heard about how Windows was full of security holes. It also > seemed that security threats only grew over time. > 2. I had heard that support for Windows 98 (my main OS at the time) was > about to be terminated and that this was even more vulnerable to security > threats than Windows XP. I wasn't about to "upgrade" my main computer from > Windows 98 due to the expense and trouble of doing so. > 3. I heard that Windows Vista was nasty - a quantum leap forward in > bloatware that was slow even on many NEW computers. I also heard that Vista > didn't work with many items of older hardware like printers, scanners, etc. > 4. I'm cheap. My attitude towards computers can be summed up by, "If it > ain't broke, don't replace it." I didn't think Windows XP was that much > better than 98 or 98 that much better than 95. But I noticed that it took > more RAM, hard drive space, processor power, etc. to do exactly the same > things we had done 10 years earlier. At the same time, I noticed that there > weren't many killer apps (like the Internet in the 1990s), so I felt that we > should be able to keep using the same computer for 5-10 years. > 5. I'm green. I thought it was scandalous that so many computers get > trashed each year NOT because some critical component failed but because the > OS failed or was declared obsolete. To me, the only good reason to get rid > of a computer is because it breaks and cannot be repaired. > > So I bought a used IBM NetVista desktop computer (256 MB of RAM, 1 GHz > processor, 20 GB hard drive, built in 2001, originally equipped with Windows > 2000, which had been removed for sale) for $50 from a local used computer > dealer. I also bought a KVM switch so I could switch between the older > computer and the newer one. I used this newer used computer for going > online and used the old computer with Windows 98 strictly offline. (I still > have and use this old computer, which I bought new in 2000. It had a 466 > MHz processor and a 4.3 GB hard drive. It originally had just 128 MB of > RAM, but I upgraded it to 384 MB of RAM. I just recently replaced the > Windows 98 setup with Linux.) > > Over the last 3 years, I have been doing more and more stuff in Linux and > less and less in Windows. My first distro was Fedora Core 1, because the CD > came with the book _Linux For Non-Geeks_. Then I used Damn Small Linux, > Puppy Linux, and Ubuntu. (I dabbled with Debian but couldn't get it > configured properly.) I recently switched to antiX Linux. As I mentioned > before, it's the most lightweight and user-friendly distro with more than > 20,000 programs in the repository due to the Debian repository > compatibility. It's the best of both worlds. > > -- > Jason Hsu, Linux user > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100203/55a031c3/attachment-0001.htm From asim at cognizo.com Wed Feb 3 01:19:34 2010 From: asim at cognizo.com (Asim Baig) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:19:34 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: <8255989d1002022240n1bc49390oc741ee0eabb3d662@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100202214200.005d4dcb.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> <8255989d1002022240n1bc49390oc741ee0eabb3d662@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B692386.90209@cognizo.com> I can't remember exactly when I first used Linux. Probably around 1993-94 when it was a 2 floppy set, but reading your email lead me to curiously search for my name on usenet, and I was surprised to find my very first time I posted something on the Internets....While I started using the Internet (downloads from ftp sites and irc mostly) in fall 1991, it was spring 1992 when I first posted online...(not BBS, but the Internets) http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.pakistan/browse_thread/thread/b9556e7bc1992973/c61684bd6fbdc825?q=asim+beg#c61684bd6fbdc825 so Linux 1993/94? Internet Sep 1991 (mostly Usenet, ftp, irc) First post Apr 1992 *Asim Baig* Cognizo Technologies 6950 France Ave S, Suite 218 Edina, MN 55435 w: (952) 955-6052 x101 c: (612) 382-7474 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet the Cognizo Team Kris Browne wrote: > When, why, and how did you start using Linux? > > Wow... Let's see here. I know when I started using Linux Slackware 1 > was current, so that puts it around 1993. At the time, I was looking > for something with more current development than the Minix I had been > using before that. > > Minix had spoiled me with virtual consoles, command line completion, > and a ton of other things which DOS couldn't even think to deliver at > the time. However, Andy Tanenbaum famously had no desire to expand it > to a general purpose system. BSD was still shackled by ATT, so Linux > became the next logical choice. > > Around 1994 I was hosting a BBS. Desqview was a royal pain to use, and > there were no other real useful DOS mutltaskers. In the end, I ran > DOSemu on top of Linux to host multiple nodes of my BBS, which ended > up using less overhead and provided better performance than Deskview did. > > For the past nearly 20 years, my desktop systems have been almost > exclusively Unix systems of some sort, and most of that has been on > Slackware or some other Linux flavor. > > > Kris Browne > kris.browne at gmail.com > 612-353-6969 > 612-408-4431 > http://www.google.com/profiles/kris.browne > > "the least expensive, most bug-free line of code is the one you didn't > have to write." - Steve Jobs > > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 21:42, Jason Hsu, Linux user > > wrote: > > When, why, and how did you start using Linux? > > I started using Linux 3 years ago. The reasons I started using > Linux were: > 1. I had heard about how Windows was full of security holes. It > also seemed that security threats only grew over time. > 2. I had heard that support for Windows 98 (my main OS at the > time) was about to be terminated and that this was even more > vulnerable to security threats than Windows XP. I wasn't about to > "upgrade" my main computer from Windows 98 due to the expense and > trouble of doing so. > 3. I heard that Windows Vista was nasty - a quantum leap forward > in bloatware that was slow even on many NEW computers. I also > heard that Vista didn't work with many items of older hardware > like printers, scanners, etc. > 4. I'm cheap. My attitude towards computers can be summed up by, > "If it ain't broke, don't replace it." I didn't think Windows XP > was that much better than 98 or 98 that much better than 95. But > I noticed that it took more RAM, hard drive space, processor > power, etc. to do exactly the same things we had done 10 years > earlier. At the same time, I noticed that there weren't many > killer apps (like the Internet in the 1990s), so I felt that we > should be able to keep using the same computer for 5-10 years. > 5. I'm green. I thought it was scandalous that so many computers > get trashed each year NOT because some critical component failed > but because the OS failed or was declared obsolete. To me, the > only good reason to get rid of a computer is because it breaks and > cannot be repaired. > > So I bought a used IBM NetVista desktop computer (256 MB of RAM, 1 > GHz processor, 20 GB hard drive, built in 2001, originally > equipped with Windows 2000, which had been removed for sale) for > $50 from a local used computer dealer. I also bought a KVM switch > so I could switch between the older computer and the newer one. I > used this newer used computer for going online and used the old > computer with Windows 98 strictly offline. (I still have and use > this old computer, which I bought new in 2000. It had a 466 MHz > processor and a 4.3 GB hard drive. It originally had just 128 MB > of RAM, but I upgraded it to 384 MB of RAM. I just recently > replaced the Windows 98 setup with Linux.) > > Over the last 3 years, I have been doing more and more stuff in > Linux and less and less in Windows. My first distro was Fedora > Core 1, because the CD came with the book _Linux For Non-Geeks_. > Then I used Damn Small Linux, Puppy Linux, and Ubuntu. (I > dabbled with Debian but couldn't get it configured properly.) I > recently switched to antiX Linux. As I mentioned before, it's the > most lightweight and user-friendly distro with more than 20,000 > programs in the repository due to the Debian repository > compatibility. It's the best of both worlds. > > -- > Jason Hsu, Linux user > > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100203/4cfa440a/attachment.htm From chrome at real-time.com Wed Feb 3 08:14:54 2010 From: chrome at real-time.com (Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:14:54 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: <20100202214200.005d4dcb.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com>; from jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com on Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:42:00PM -0600 References: <20100202214200.005d4dcb.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> Message-ID: <20100203081454.E18676@real-time.com> I first heard about Linux in 1995 or so, when I saw a guy on the bus at college with what I now know to be a Slackware book in his hand. I asked him "What's that?" He said "It's Linux." I said "What's Linux?" It sounded really interesting, but I only owned one computer at the time and wasn't going to risk my data with a dual-install system. So it had to wait until I was out of college and at a job where I put together a system from leftover parts and installed Red Hat 5.2 on it. I immediately loved it because: * It didn't treat me like I was an idiot. * It didn't crash once a day or more! * I could talk to my computer in complete sentences (command line) instead of using a point-and-grunt interface. * The manual was good and helpful. (Yes, I got the company to buy the boxed set). * RH5.2 was the first version that supported different languages in the installer. Their test language was 'redneck'. So the installer would ask questions like: Whut kind of CD-ROM dew yew have? [ ] SCSI CD-ROM [X] Crappy CD-ROM Would you like to floormat yer hard drive? Congratupations yew are dun! So here was an OS that could laugh at itself! I loved it. At home I put Debian on a machine I'd built from parts bought at government auction. Not having a network card for it, I sneakerneted all the packages over to it on floppies. Learned a bit about tarballs and cat in the process. I still wasn't willing to switch to Linux, primarily because my preferred mail/newsreader was Agent, which wasn't available on Linux. However, eventually my Windows machine got loaded with viruses and installed Red Hat 6.0 on it. It was an old and slow machine tho (Cyrix 166/32MB RAM) and when I had the money I got a shiny new 1.1GHz machine and installed Debian on it. 9+ years later, I'm still using that same box for my home workstation. The disk drives have been replaced several times over tho. (Usually without too much data loss). The fundamental problem now is that the Web is so flash-heavy these days that a 1.1GHz single-core machine is just not up to the task. -- Carl Soderstrom Systems Administrator Real-Time Enterprises www.real-time.com From auditodd at comcast.net Wed Feb 3 10:03:23 2010 From: auditodd at comcast.net (auditodd at comcast.net) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:03:23 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: <20100202214200.005d4dcb.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> Message-ID: <1302050333.2322671265213003378.JavaMail.root@sz0147a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Hsu, Linux user" When, why, and how did you start using Linux? ---------------------------------- 2001 - Smoothwall on an old used IBM desktop with 200Mhz CPU and 128MB of RAM I got free from a buddy at work. Had to protect my Windows machine on my new cable/broadband Internet connection. I had previous Unix experience so it wasn't that 'new' of an experience. Shortly afterwards I had a spare PC that I started running Mandrake on and used it as a home server for network shares. To this day I still always have a Smoothwall to protect my network and a Linux server for network shares. I played with FreeNAS for a little while, but the 'single purpose' machine drove me batty. From ryanjcole at me.com Wed Feb 3 10:10:15 2010 From: ryanjcole at me.com (Ryan Coleman) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:10:15 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: <1302050333.2322671265213003378.JavaMail.root@sz0147a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net> References: <1302050333.2322671265213003378.JavaMail.root@sz0147a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net> Message-ID: <4B699FE7.1050300@me.com> First exposure: 1998-99 school year with Red Hat 5.0 (I think, bought it off the shelf at Circuit City). Built my first server: April, 2002. (Red Hat 6) Switched to FreeBSD in July, 2002, after a rootkit hack. Been running FreeBSD servers ever since, but only as service machines; never for desktops or workstations. I've been hosting websites either locally through DSL and Cable or remotely through farms since April, 2002. Supposedly I know enough to be a support specialist (according to people I've worked with) but I don't think so. :) Although it would be nice to get out of development double time. From r_a_wilkinson at yahoo.com Wed Feb 3 13:45:47 2010 From: r_a_wilkinson at yahoo.com (bob) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:45:47 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? Message-ID: <1265226347.11760.57.camel@bob-old-desktop> I started using Linux back in the DOS days when the company I worked for wanted me to study the differences between the new Microsoft Windows OS that was just introduced, and Linux for the work place. Although I loved Linux compared to DOS, there just wasn't any quality, user friendly office productivity software. About 2 years ago I heard of Ubuntu and gave it a try. WOW what a difference. I am using Linux more and Windows less every day... on my home computer. If I were in the same position I was in years ago, I would sill have to go with Windows because of the lack of quality, user friendly productivity software. AS much and as fast as Linux had evolved, it still can't compete in the office environment with non-techie users. Give me some GOOD OCR software and much better hardware compatibility, and I will change my mind, throw out Windows, and never look back! The most important point though, is that Linux lovers need to stop arguing with me and fix the problems. If you don't, Linux will always be inferior to Windows for the masses. But then.... isn't that what some of you really want? From Larry.Pint at ntuminc.com Wed Feb 3 14:01:32 2010 From: Larry.Pint at ntuminc.com (Larry R. Pint) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:01:32 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: <1265226347.11760.57.camel@bob-old-desktop> Message-ID: .:\:/:. +-------------------+ .:\:\:/:/:. | PLEASE DO NOT | :.:\:\:/:/:.: | FEED THE TROLLS | :=.' - - '.=: | | '=(\ 9 9 /)=' | Thank you, | ( (_) ) | Management | /`-vvv-'\ +-------------------+ / \ | | @@@ / /|,,,,,|\ \ | | @@@ /_// /^\ \\_\ @x@@x@ | | |/ WW( ( ) )WW \||||/ | | \| __\,,\ /,,/__ \||/ | | | (______Y______) /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\//\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ > -----Original Message----- > From: tclug-list-bounces at mn-linux.org [mailto:tclug-list-bounces at mn- > linux.org] On Behalf Of bob > Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 1:46 PM > To: tclug-list at mn-linux.org > Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? > > I started using Linux back in the DOS days when the company I worked for > wanted me to study the differences between the new Microsoft Windows OS > that was just introduced, and Linux for the work place. > > Although I loved Linux compared to DOS, there just wasn't any quality, > user friendly office productivity software. > > About 2 years ago I heard of Ubuntu and gave it a try. WOW what a > difference. I am using Linux more and Windows less every day... on my > home computer. > > If I were in the same position I was in years ago, I would sill have to > go with Windows because of the lack of quality, user friendly > productivity software. AS much and as fast as Linux had evolved, it > still can't compete in the office environment with non-techie users. > > Give me some GOOD OCR software and much better hardware compatibility, > and I will change my mind, throw out Windows, and never look back! > > The most important point though, is that Linux lovers need to stop > arguing with me and fix the problems. If you don't, Linux will always > be inferior to Windows for the masses. But then.... isn't that what > some of you really want? > > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list From r_a_wilkinson at yahoo.com Wed Feb 3 14:17:32 2010 From: r_a_wilkinson at yahoo.com (bob) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:17:32 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? Message-ID: <1265228252.11760.66.camel@bob-old-desktop> Thanks for proving my point Larry! A personal attack on me, not discussion of the issues I raise. .:\:/:. +-------------------+ .:\:\:/:/:. | PLEASE DO NOT | :.:\:\:/:/:.: | FEED THE TROLLS | :=.' - - '.=: | | '=(\ 9 9 /)=' | Thank you, | ( (_) ) | Management | /`-vvv-'\ +-------------------+ / \ | | @@@ / /|,,,,,|\ \ | | @@@ /_// /^\ \\_\ @x@@x@ | | |/ WW( ( ) )WW \||||/ | | \| __\,,\ /,,/__ \||/ | | | (______Y______) /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\//\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ From admin at lctn.org Wed Feb 3 15:06:21 2010 From: admin at lctn.org (Raymond Norton) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:06:21 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] snmp help Message-ID: <4B69E54D.2010309@lctn.org> I am trying to configure snmp to display disk space, memory used, and load levels on a couple servers. I am using snmpget and snmpwalk and getting errors similar to this: snmpget -v 1 -c public localhost .1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.1.1.1 Error in packet Reason: (noSuchName) There is no such variable name in this MIB. Failed object: SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.1.1.1 I know it is a simple configuration issue, but have not found the solution. I could use some assistance making the necessary changes to get this working I am currently working with a redhat vmware server. Raymond From jolexa at jolexa.net Wed Feb 3 15:32:41 2010 From: jolexa at jolexa.net (Jeremy Olexa) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:32:41 +0000 Subject: [tclug-list] =?utf-8?q?When=2C_why=2C_and_how_did_you_start_using?= =?utf-8?q?_Linux=3F?= In-Reply-To: <1265226347.11760.57.camel@bob-old-desktop> References: <1265226347.11760.57.camel@bob-old-desktop> Message-ID: <77806bbd1f7483d2a75a3936e215f3eb@jolexa.net> On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:45:47 -0600, bob wrote: > I started using Linux back in the DOS days when the company I worked for > wanted me to study the differences between the new Microsoft Windows OS > that was just introduced, and Linux for the work place. Well, it can and it does. I use open source solutions in a windows environment at work. It just takes an open mindset. Also, as a non-windows household, my non-techie roommate can use any one of my computers without asking me questions. AND, she is a girl (not even in IT!) :) In your case, it seems like you are a supporter of status-quo. I don't mind though. > Although I loved Linux compared to DOS, there just wasn't any quality, > user friendly office productivity software. > > About 2 years ago I heard of Ubuntu and gave it a try. WOW what a > difference. I am using Linux more and Windows less every day... on my > home computer. > > If I were in the same position I was in years ago, I would sill have to > go with Windows because of the lack of quality, user friendly > productivity software. AS much and as fast as Linux had evolved, it > still can't compete in the office environment with non-techie users. > > Give me some GOOD OCR software and much better hardware compatibility, > and I will change my mind, throw out Windows, and never look back! > > The most important point though, is that Linux lovers need to stop > arguing with me and fix the problems. If you don't, Linux will always > be inferior to Windows for the masses. But then.... isn't that what > some of you really want? See, that is the thing. You are never going to get good responses when you start the conversation by alienating people. This is considered trolling. "This sucks because I say it does, prove me wrong" type of thing. On a serious note, if you like that linux is free, then you can't expect someone else to just "fix it for me" - If no kernel developers are using the hardware that you have, well..you can probably pay someone to make it work. Similarly with software. I choose to work on free software because I like to, I don't care to support people with attitudes like "your software sucks because foo doesn't work, Windows is better" either contribute constructively or don't use it. :) Get involved, file bugs for projects, donate some money (or hardware) to your favorite software application (or distribution). Submit a patch :) Linux in general means nothing if people are not involved. -Jeremy > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list From danyberg at gmail.com Wed Feb 3 15:45:27 2010 From: danyberg at gmail.com (swede) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 15:45:27 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Wanted: Message-ID: <5daafeb11002031345v467889d7k6bbee79fd0e962e6@mail.gmail.com> A while back I was asking about a networking solution for my church, and I got some good suggestions. Well, we're still waiting for the fiber optic connection to be installed, but we decided to get some of the internal wiring done now (Or sometime soon). And a couple offers of cheap managed switches didn't pan out. So... I'm looking for a cheap managed switch. And if anyone wants to help get it set up I'd welcome the chance to learn from someone else, but I am sure I can figure it all out if I have to. And even farther off topic: Anyone know where I might be able to find a good 32 channel sound board for a good price? Thanks, Dave danyberg at gmail.com -- "In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem." - Ronald Reagan <>< -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100203/15c42ec7/attachment.htm From iipreca at hotmail.com Wed Feb 3 15:58:43 2010 From: iipreca at hotmail.com (G J) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 15:58:43 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Wanted: In-Reply-To: <5daafeb11002031345v467889d7k6bbee79fd0e962e6@mail.gmail.com> References: <5daafeb11002031345v467889d7k6bbee79fd0e962e6@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: I don't have a managed switch laying around to give ya, but as far as the mixer goes, I'm a little more knowledgeable (A/V tech for college campus). I don't know what your definition of cheap is but for about $880 you can get a new 32 channel board from these guys behringer.com/EN/Products/SX3242FX.aspx I have first hand experience with their gear and they are very high quality at a more reasonable cost. After that I'd hit eBay, you know the rest. Jesse A while back I was asking about a networking solution for my church, and I got some good suggestions. Well, we're still waiting for the fiber optic connection to be installed, but we decided to get some of the internal wiring done now (Or sometime soon). And a couple offers of cheap managed switches didn't pan out. So... I'm looking for a cheap managed switch. And if anyone wants to help get it set up I'd welcome the chance to learn from someone else, but I am sure I can figure it all out if I have to. And even farther off topic: Anyone know where I might be able to find a good 32 channel sound board for a good price? Thanks, Dave danyberg at gmail.com -- "In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem." - Ronald Reagan <>< _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft?s powerful SPAM protection. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469226/direct/01/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100203/6fa8913e/attachment.htm From mbmiller+l at gmail.com Wed Feb 3 18:12:15 2010 From: mbmiller+l at gmail.com (Mike Miller) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 18:12:15 -0600 (CST) Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: <1265226347.11760.57.camel@bob-old-desktop> References: <1265226347.11760.57.camel@bob-old-desktop> Message-ID: On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, bob wrote: > Give me some GOOD OCR software and much better hardware compatibility, > and I will change my mind, throw out Windows, and never look back! > > The most important point though, is that Linux lovers need to stop > arguing with me and fix the problems. If you don't, Linux will always > be inferior to Windows for the masses. But then.... isn't that what > some of you really want? These supposed problems are only problems for people with incompatible hardware or with certain software needs that aren't met in a GNU/Linux environment. If you choose hardware that works well with Linux, you can install Ubuntu in 15 minutes (using maybe 2 minutes of your own time). I have installed it on five desktop machines in the past year with no problems. I also installed it on a EeePC netbook (Ubuntu Netbook Remix) and that too was fairly easy -- I had to use a USB stick which could challenge some people but it wasn't a huge hassle. I don't want Linux to be "inferior for the masses," and I don't think it is inferior. People usually don't have to install Windows, but if they did, they'd have problems. If manufacturers would sell their computers with Linux installed, "the masses" would do great. As Linux popularity increases, demand will increase, and manufacturers will have to adjust. Microsoft will fight for their exclusivity agreements (which probably should be illegal because they are anti-competitive), but they might be overwhelmed in the end, or at least I hope that will happen. Mike From max at bernsteinforpresident.com Wed Feb 3 18:30:13 2010 From: max at bernsteinforpresident.com (Max Shinn) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 18:30:13 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201002031830.13777.max@bernsteinforpresident.com> We seem to be forgetting about Larry's advice... There is nothing to be gained by responding to comments such as Bob's. (Oohh! Sounds like VeggieTales!) On Wednesday 03 February 2010 2:01:32 pm Larry R. Pint wrote: > > .:\:/:. > +-------------------+ .:\:\:/:/:. > | PLEASE DO NOT | :.:\:\:/:/:.: > | FEED THE TROLLS | :=.' - - '.=: > | | '=(\ 9 9 /)=' > | Thank you, | ( (_) ) > | Management | /`-vvv-'\ > +-------------------+ / \ > | | @@@ / /|,,,,,|\ \ > | | @@@ /_// /^\ \\_\ > @x@@x@ | | |/ WW( ( ) )WW > \||||/ | | \| __\,,\ /,,/__ > \||/ | | | (______Y______) > /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\//\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: tclug-list-bounces at mn-linux.org [mailto:tclug-list-bounces at mn- > > linux.org] On Behalf Of bob > > Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 1:46 PM > > To: tclug-list at mn-linux.org > > Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? > > > > I started using Linux back in the DOS days when the company I worked > for > > wanted me to study the differences between the new Microsoft Windows > OS > > that was just introduced, and Linux for the work place. > > > > Although I loved Linux compared to DOS, there just wasn't any quality, > > user friendly office productivity software. > > > > About 2 years ago I heard of Ubuntu and gave it a try. WOW what a > > difference. I am using Linux more and Windows less every day... on my > > home computer. > > > > If I were in the same position I was in years ago, I would sill have > to > > go with Windows because of the lack of quality, user friendly > > productivity software. AS much and as fast as Linux had evolved, it > > still can't compete in the office environment with non-techie users. > > > > Give me some GOOD OCR software and much better hardware compatibility, > > and I will change my mind, throw out Windows, and never look back! > > > > The most important point though, is that Linux lovers need to stop > > arguing with me and fix the problems. If you don't, Linux will always > > be inferior to Windows for the masses. But then.... isn't that what > > some of you really want? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > -- Max Shinn Programmer, Composer max at BernsteinForPresident.com www.BernsteinForPresident.com | trombonechamp.wordpress.com "Those who stand for nothing fall for anything." -Alexander Hamilton From jjensen at apache.org Wed Feb 3 20:26:20 2010 From: jjensen at apache.org (Jeff Jensen) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 20:26:20 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: <20100202214200.005d4dcb.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> References: <20100202214200.005d4dcb.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> Message-ID: <005001caa541$74025e50$5c071af0$@org> In the early 90's a startup I joined changed direction and I had to learn DEC Unix on the Alpha's for the hardward/software products we made. Really nice OS and hardware. The great thing is I learned enough to get started on a Linux server on my own. I wanted some kind of file and printer server, so, after that ride, sometime in 1999 I bought a very used PC from my first consulting customer for $25 (they were unloading a lot of hardware). I added a new big harddrive (10G!). Naturally (as it was free and I sort of knew Unix enough) I installed Red Hat and went from there. For the first few years I upgraded until RH7, then ran that version until last fall when a board failure occurred. So that little box ran flawlessly for 10 years! From cncole at earthlink.net Wed Feb 3 18:33:52 2010 From: cncole at earthlink.net (Chuck Cole) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 18:33:52 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: <1265226347.11760.57.camel@bob-old-desktop> Message-ID: > -----Original Message----- > From: tclug-list-bounces at mn-linux.org > [mailto:tclug-list-bounces at mn-linux.org]On Behalf Of bob > Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 1:46 PM > To: tclug-list at mn-linux.org > Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? > > > > Give me some GOOD OCR software and much better hardware compatibility, > and I will change my mind, throw out Windows, and never look back! The Windows OCR software that comes with my scanners doesn't seem any better or as good as Tesseract for Linux that is highly praised. Exactly what is your complaint or need for function that is better in Windows? What does one have to pay to get better than the excellent free stuff, and what does it do that is better? Chuck From r_a_wilkinson at yahoo.com Wed Feb 3 21:08:20 2010 From: r_a_wilkinson at yahoo.com (bob) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:08:20 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? Message-ID: <1265252900.3880.58.camel@bob-old-desktop> I'm glad you all love Linux so much. I said I like it too! But there are some things that Windows does better for some users. Especially in the workplace cubicle. If Linux was so superior, and FREE, then Microsoft would not exist. Prove me wrong? You CAN'T prove me wrong, Windows will remain dominant until people admit Linux has faults and do something about them. I'm not seeing that here! Now if you will excuse me, I have some documents that need to be scanned and OCR'd. I will have to reboot to Windows. Live with it. From r_a_wilkinson at yahoo.com Wed Feb 3 21:39:56 2010 From: r_a_wilkinson at yahoo.com (bob) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:39:56 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? Message-ID: <1265254796.3880.80.camel@bob-old-desktop> Mark, The question was "When, why, and how did you start using Linux?" I answered the question honestly. I got mugged by people who obviously wanted to fight more than stay on topic. And I am not the one who resorted to name calling instead of intelligent dialog. God bless you anyway, Bob From jhsu802701 at jasonhsu.com Wed Feb 3 22:11:56 2010 From: jhsu802701 at jasonhsu.com (Jason Hsu, Linux user) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 22:11:56 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Jobs/careers related to Linux Message-ID: <20100203221156.dcaba5dd.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> What types of jobs/careers involve using Linux? I'd like to hear from those of you who use Linux on the job, whether Linux is your main job/career or just one aspect of your job/career. Although I am currently seeking an embedded engineering position (working with microcontrollers), I have also thought of turning Linux into a career as well. An embedded engineering position at a workplace that uses Linux would be a good way to combine the two. -- Jason Hsu, Linux user From goodstuff9 at msn.com Thu Feb 4 00:12:43 2010 From: goodstuff9 at msn.com (goodstuff9 at msn.com) Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:12:43 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: <1265254796.3880.80.camel@bob-old-desktop> References: <1265254796.3880.80.camel@bob-old-desktop> Message-ID: I won't call anyone names. I have used Windows for about almost 30 years. About two years ago my disgust with it could no longer be contained, so - to paraphrase Morpheus from "The Matrix" - I took the red pill and freed my mind, and switched wholesale to Linux. I never looked back. I am very, very happy with Linux. (Having said that, it is my sense that there is a lot of denial among Linux advocates. Most of the human race absolutely does *NOT* want to be bothered with the software management that goes with Linux. Microsoft does a much better job than any Linux distro of designing their product to appeal to people who want not to have to think about their computers at all. This is why Windows maintains its greater popularity.) bob wrote: > Mark, > > The question was "When, why, and how did you start using Linux?" > > I answered the question honestly. > > I got mugged by people who obviously wanted to fight more than stay on > topic. > > And I am not the one who resorted to name calling instead of intelligent > dialog. > > God bless you anyway, > > Bob > > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > > From mbmiller+l at gmail.com Thu Feb 4 00:27:23 2010 From: mbmiller+l at gmail.com (Mike Miller) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 00:27:23 -0600 (CST) Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: References: <1265254796.3880.80.camel@bob-old-desktop> Message-ID: On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, goodstuff9 at msn.com wrote: > (Having said that, it is my sense that there is a lot of denial among > Linux advocates. Most of the human race absolutely does *NOT* want to be > bothered with the software management that goes with Linux. Microsoft > does a much better job than any Linux distro of designing their product > to appeal to people who want not to have to think about their computers > at all. This is why Windows maintains its greater popularity.) So it's not because of the anti-competitive exclusivity agreements with Dell and others or illegal collusion with Intel? It's not because people like to just keep doing what they're doing and not deal with the hassle of changing to something else? For me, using Ubuntu isn't harder than using Win XP. It does it's own updates, I just have to click "yes". Windows is like that too. Compare synaptic with what you go through to install a program in Windows. How is Windows easier? I really don't think it is. Mike From max at bernsteinforpresident.com Thu Feb 4 06:47:37 2010 From: max at bernsteinforpresident.com (Max Shinn) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 06:47:37 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: References: <1265254796.3880.80.camel@bob-old-desktop> Message-ID: <201002040647.37692.max@bernsteinforpresident.com> > (Having said that, it is my sense that there is a lot of denial among > Linux advocates. Most of the human race absolutely does *NOT* want to be > bothered with the software management that goes with Linux. Microsoft > does a much better job than any Linux distro of designing their product > to appeal to people who want not to have to think about their computers > at all. This is why Windows maintains its greater popularity.) I think it is important to look at this as a part of a bigger picture. The reason Windows is seen as "easy to use" in comparison to GNU/Linux is because people in general don't recognize the difference between "unfamiliar" and "distaste". Has anyone read the Gladwell book "Blink"? He has a chapter devoted to this concept, but instead of discussing software, he discusses office chairs. If GNU/Linux was the most popular desktop operating system, it would no doubt be considered the easiest to use. So, one can conclude that Windows is not more popular because it is easier to use, but rather, the other way around: Windows is easier to use because it is more popular. -Max From troythetechguy at gmail.com Thu Feb 4 07:50:50 2010 From: troythetechguy at gmail.com (Troy) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 07:50:50 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Jobs/careers related to Linux In-Reply-To: <20100203221156.dcaba5dd.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> References: <20100203221156.dcaba5dd.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> Message-ID: <34de7f3d1002040550y70ac1c96u8ded587168ff5e2a@mail.gmail.com> Currently, Linux is only a small aspect of my job as a support technician. We use Linux on a server that functions as our intranet, and we recently installed Ubuntu on a couple workstations that will function as public computers for guests to use. It will be interesting to hear what feedback we receive from the guests using the Ubuntu workstations. On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Jason Hsu, Linux user < jhsu802701 at jasonhsu.com> wrote: > What types of jobs/careers involve using Linux? I'd like to hear from > those of you who use Linux on the job, whether Linux is your main job/career > or just one aspect of your job/career. > > Although I am currently seeking an embedded engineering position (working > with microcontrollers), I have also thought of turning Linux into a career > as well. An embedded engineering position at a workplace that uses Linux > would be a good way to combine the two. > > -- > Jason Hsu, Linux user > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100204/e61dee6d/attachment.htm From florin at iucha.net Thu Feb 4 08:19:44 2010 From: florin at iucha.net (Florin Iucha) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 08:19:44 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: <1265252900.3880.58.camel@bob-old-desktop> References: <1265252900.3880.58.camel@bob-old-desktop> Message-ID: <20100204141944.GD2519@iris.iucha.org> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 09:08:20PM -0600, bob wrote: > I'm glad you all love Linux so much. I said I like it too! But there are > some things that Windows does better for some users. Especially in the > workplace cubicle. If Linux was so superior, and FREE, then Microsoft > would not exist. Prove me wrong? You CAN'T prove me wrong, How about the many news articles where "X moves to Linux" whether is a city in Europe or a school district someplace and then a few months later you heart that 'they got a deal from Microsoft' to keep Windows? Those budget decisions are taken by a few people, who are corruptible or dumb. And the bribe does not have to be obvious, or paid by Microsoft directly - as an IT director, you'd rather have a big budget and an army of low-paid MCSEs to keep rebooting and re-imaging the same rooted boxes than a few experienced but expensive UNIX admins that can manage the same amount of computing power. Plus, Linux started when Microsoft was already entrenched and it takes a while to fall from 95% market penetration. But fall it does, year by year. > Windows will remain dominant until people admit Linux has faults and do > something about them. I'm not seeing that here! I'm glad Windows has no faults. Er... wait... > Now if you will excuse me, I have some documents that need to be scanned > and OCR'd. I will have to reboot to Windows. Godspeed. florin -- Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition. http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100204/5aa583d2/attachment-0001.pgp From ryanjcole at me.com Thu Feb 4 09:00:54 2010 From: ryanjcole at me.com (Ryan Coleman) Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 09:00:54 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: <20100204141944.GD2519@iris.iucha.org> References: <1265252900.3880.58.camel@bob-old-desktop> <20100204141944.GD2519@iris.iucha.org> Message-ID: <4B6AE126.9090505@me.com> Florin Iucha wrote: > And the bribe does not have to be obvious, or paid by > Microsoft directly - as an IT director, you'd rather have a big budget > and an army of low-paid MCSEs to keep rebooting and re-imaging the > same rooted boxes than a few experienced but expensive UNIX admins that > can manage the same amount of computing power. > I'm an experienced Unix admin that isn't expensive. In fact, I'm cheaper than most MCSE "gods" at between 50-75k. You get what you pay for. From Craig.A.Smith at honeywell.com Thu Feb 4 09:08:54 2010 From: Craig.A.Smith at honeywell.com (Smith, Craig A) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:08:54 -0500 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: <201002040647.37692.max@bernsteinforpresident.com> References: <1265254796.3880.80.camel@bob-old-desktop> <201002040647.37692.max@bernsteinforpresident.com> Message-ID: <352399F8DB39E14FBB4B648897CA32E604A8F4FF@DE08EV802.global.ds.honeywell.com> > Microsoft does a much better job than any Linux distro of designing their product > to appeal to people who want not to have to think about their computers > at all. This is why Windows maintains its greater popularity.) If it were as simple that, then Macintosh would dominate the consumer market with Windows running a distance 2nd place. From blutgens at gmail.com Thu Feb 4 09:11:04 2010 From: blutgens at gmail.com (Ben) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:11:04 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: <20100204141944.GD2519@iris.iucha.org> References: <1265252900.3880.58.camel@bob-old-desktop> <20100204141944.GD2519@iris.iucha.org> Message-ID: Well its nice to see that blatant, asshat trolls still frequent the LUG list. On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Florin Iucha wrote: > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 09:08:20PM -0600, bob wrote: > > I'm glad you all love Linux so much. I said I like it too! But there are > > some things that Windows does better for some users. Especially in the > > workplace cubicle. If Linux was so superior, and FREE, then Microsoft > > would not exist. Prove me wrong? You CAN'T prove me wrong, > > How about the many news articles where "X moves to Linux" whether is a > city in Europe or a school district someplace and then a few months > later you heart that 'they got a deal from Microsoft' to keep Windows? > Those budget decisions are taken by a few people, who are corruptible > or dumb. And the bribe does not have to be obvious, or paid by > Microsoft directly - as an IT director, you'd rather have a big budget > and an army of low-paid MCSEs to keep rebooting and re-imaging the > same rooted boxes than a few experienced but expensive UNIX admins that > can manage the same amount of computing power. > > Plus, Linux started when Microsoft was already entrenched and it takes > a while to fall from 95% market penetration. But fall it does, year > by year. > > > Windows will remain dominant until people admit Linux has faults and do > > something about them. I'm not seeing that here! > > I'm glad Windows has no faults. Er... wait... > > > Now if you will excuse me, I have some documents that need to be scanned > > and OCR'd. I will have to reboot to Windows. > > Godspeed. > > florin > > -- > Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition. > http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163 > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > -- Ben Lutgens Linux / Unix System Administror Three of your friends throw up after eating chicken salad. Do you think: "I should find more robust friends" or "we should check that refrigerator"? -- Donald Becker, on vortex-bug, suspecting a network-wide problem -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100204/7068fe13/attachment.htm From ryanjcole at me.com Thu Feb 4 09:16:06 2010 From: ryanjcole at me.com (Ryan Coleman) Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 09:16:06 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: References: <1265252900.3880.58.camel@bob-old-desktop> <20100204141944.GD2519@iris.iucha.org> Message-ID: <4B6AE4B6.2080603@me.com> You just fed them. Now we must feed you to them. grr. [and yes, I'm aware I technically fed them, too] Ben wrote: > Well its nice to see that blatant, asshat trolls still frequent the > LUG list. > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Florin Iucha > wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 09:08:20PM -0600, bob wrote: > > I'm glad you all love Linux so much. I said I like it too! But > there are > > some things that Windows does better for some users. Especially > in the > > workplace cubicle. If Linux was so superior, and FREE, then > Microsoft > > would not exist. Prove me wrong? You CAN'T prove me wrong, > > How about the many news articles where "X moves to Linux" whether is a > city in Europe or a school district someplace and then a few months > later you heart that 'they got a deal from Microsoft' to keep Windows? > Those budget decisions are taken by a few people, who are corruptible > or dumb. And the bribe does not have to be obvious, or paid by > Microsoft directly - as an IT director, you'd rather have a big budget > and an army of low-paid MCSEs to keep rebooting and re-imaging the > same rooted boxes than a few experienced but expensive UNIX admins > that > can manage the same amount of computing power. > > Plus, Linux started when Microsoft was already entrenched and it takes > a while to fall from 95% market penetration. But fall it does, year > by year. > > > Windows will remain dominant until people admit Linux has faults > and do > > something about them. I'm not seeing that here! > > I'm glad Windows has no faults. Er... wait... > > > Now if you will excuse me, I have some documents that need to be > scanned > > and OCR'd. I will have to reboot to Windows. > > Godspeed. > > florin > From mbmiller+l at gmail.com Thu Feb 4 10:13:16 2010 From: mbmiller+l at gmail.com (Mike Miller) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:13:16 -0600 (CST) Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: <4B6AE4B6.2080603@me.com> References: <1265252900.3880.58.camel@bob-old-desktop> <20100204141944.GD2519@iris.iucha.org> <4B6AE4B6.2080603@me.com> Message-ID: On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Ryan Coleman wrote: > You just fed them. Now we must feed you to them. grr. [and yes, I'm > aware I technically fed them, too] We do it because we have things we want to say. They remind us to say them. Mike From ryanjcole at me.com Thu Feb 4 10:14:08 2010 From: ryanjcole at me.com (Ryan Coleman) Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:14:08 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Troll feeding... unintentional... I think... In-Reply-To: References: <1265252900.3880.58.camel@bob-old-desktop> <20100204141944.GD2519@iris.iucha.org> <4B6AE4B6.2080603@me.com> Message-ID: <4B6AF250.5040804@me.com> Very true. I changed the thread since we're OT. Mike Miller wrote: > On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Ryan Coleman wrote: > >> You just fed them. Now we must feed you to them. grr. [and yes, I'm >> aware I technically fed them, too] > > > We do it because we have things we want to say. They remind us to say > them. > > Mike From kc0iog at gmail.com Thu Feb 4 10:29:12 2010 From: kc0iog at gmail.com (Brian Wall) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:29:12 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Jobs/careers related to Linux In-Reply-To: <20100203221156.dcaba5dd.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> References: <20100203221156.dcaba5dd.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> Message-ID: <2c6699da1002040829l60e1a21s7a8d020723b5ce1a@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Jason Hsu, Linux user wrote: > What types of jobs/careers involve using Linux? ?I'd like to hear from those of you who use Linux on the job, whether Linux is your main job/career or just one aspect of your job/career. > > Although I am currently seeking an embedded engineering position (working with microcontrollers), I have also thought of turning Linux into a career as well. ?An embedded engineering position at a workplace that uses Linux would be a good way to combine the two. IT and engineering are where you'll end up using linux the most. I used to work in IT, and my linux usage was limited to utility computing. Primarily a WIndows shop, I used linux where it made sense to set up a single function box (like our proxy server running squid). Linux has a potential to be part of almost any IT infrastructure, right tool for the job I say. I spent less than 5% of my time playing with linux, just because I wore so many hats that tinkering with the linux boxes wasn't a common activity. Some organzations find value in running primarily linux, most don't. The important thing is not to force linux into the infrastructure. Sometimes linux doesn't make sense, sometimes it does. Right tool for the job. I think I said that already. The nice thing now vs 5 years ago is that you don't scare people away when you say "linux" in the datacenter. Linux is widely accepted now, and plays well with others. Not to mention most VARs support linux, so boxes are now supportable by more than just the guy who set it up. Now I work support for Xiotech, and my linux roles have changed tremendously. Our core products are built on linux, and even though I don't do any sort of development on those products, I'm constantly looking at linux logs and playing with the CLI (in the lab and in the field). My lapotp runs Windows because all of our support tools are WIndows based. The engineers run whatever they want to. Some run Windows, some linux, some OS X, and the hardcore guys run OpenBSD or Solaris. Brian From cncole at earthlink.net Thu Feb 4 13:15:58 2010 From: cncole at earthlink.net (Chuck Cole) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 13:15:58 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: <201002040647.37692.max@bernsteinforpresident.com> Message-ID: > -----Original Message----- > From: tclug-list-bounces at mn-linux.org > [mailto:tclug-list-bounces at mn-linux.org]On Behalf Of Max Shinn > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 6:48 AM > > I think it is important to look at this as a part of a bigger picture. The > reason Windows is seen as "easy to use" in comparison to GNU/Linux is because > people in general don't recognize the difference between "unfamiliar" and > "distaste". Has anyone read the Gladwell book "Blink"? He has a chapter > devoted to this concept, but instead of discussing software, he discusses > office chairs. If GNU/Linux was the most popular desktop operating system, > it would no doubt be considered the easiest to use. So, one can conclude that > Windows is not more popular because it is easier to use, but rather, the other > way around: Windows is easier to use because it is more popular. > > -Max I wouldn't claim that the analogy is "exact", but this reminds me of the push to use Esperanto instead of English because Eaperanto was easier, better, etc, as a world-wide common language. A few "intellectuals" learned and spoke Esparanto whenever they could. However, there never was a city where a common tourist could ask directions to restrooms or restaurants in Esperanto, so folks continued using what they knew. On the other hand, there was a day when IBM and its proprietary hardware and software was dominant. Because of its attempt at rigid (and expensive) proprietary control, IBM is no longer such a big deal. Microspft is headed that same way at an increasing pace as they attempt to make IE6 and XP Pro obsolete and require much more powerful hardware to run the same old stuff. Microsoft has not added any actual functionality to Office Pro since 1997, but has made minor format changes that make it hard for an average user to use rhe old stuff. Many corporations (Honeywell was/is one, Wells Fargo is another) maintain legacy compatibility because huge numbers of their customers have no need or budget for $1,000/year "upgrades". Keep your IBM punched card reader and remember the day when IBM and those were boss :-) I used to do math by rubbing two sticks together... Chuck From Dean.Benjamin at mm.com Thu Feb 4 13:58:49 2010 From: Dean.Benjamin at mm.com (Dean.Benjamin at mm.com) Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:58:49 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: References: <201002040647.37692.max@bernsteinforpresident.com> Message-ID: <6.1.2.0.2.20100204135742.0258ba78@pop.mm.com> At 2/4/2010 01:15 PM, Chuck Cole wrote: >I used to do math by rubbing two sticks together... No, that's how we used to start flame wars. Beads -- that's how we did math. From mailinglists at soul-dev.com Thu Feb 4 14:02:18 2010 From: mailinglists at soul-dev.com (Mr. MailingLists) Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:02:18 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Troll feeding... unintentional... I think... In-Reply-To: <4B6AF250.5040804@me.com> References: <1265252900.3880.58.camel@bob-old-desktop> <20100204141944.GD2519@iris.iucha.org> <4B6AE4B6.2080603@me.com> <4B6AF250.5040804@me.com> Message-ID: <4B6B27CA.6020500@soul-dev.com> On 2/4/2010 10:14 AM, Ryan Coleman wrote: > Very true. > > I changed the thread since we're OT. > > Mike Miller wrote: >> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Ryan Coleman wrote: >> >>> You just fed them. Now we must feed you to them. grr. [and yes, I'm >>> aware I technically fed them, too] >> >> >> We do it because we have things we want to say. They remind us to say >> them. >> >> Mike > I agree, if the response is at least thoughtful than by all means I want to hear from you. If your only interest is in throwing crap back and forth then there is no point. Most of the responses from the thread that spawned this OT thread have been well thought out and I personally have benefited, and enjoyed reading them. The rest is mostly a chuckle session as I drink my morning coffee; does no harm to me. -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments From billshorn at gmail.com Wed Feb 3 22:07:23 2010 From: billshorn at gmail.com (Bill Ryce) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 22:07:23 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Samba: Shares work except printer Message-ID: Hello. I have a HP LaserJet attached to my Fedora server with typical parallel/Centronix interface. Users of the Linux box have no trouble printing to it (Web browsers, Emacs, a2ps, etc.). This Fedora 12 Box is a Samba server to my network. My problem with Samba is that shares work fine except for printer shares. I can browse directory shares with ease from a Windows (Vista) machine. From diablomarcus at gmail.com Wed Feb 3 21:24:12 2010 From: diablomarcus at gmail.com (Mark Katerberg) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 21:24:12 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: <1265252900.3880.58.camel@bob-old-desktop> References: <1265252900.3880.58.camel@bob-old-desktop> Message-ID: <26897bbd1002031924sb193d76wc7f749ec35c42224@mail.gmail.com> I don't think anyone here cares too much that you run Windoze. End of conversation. Do what you want. Trolls only live because they get people pissed. On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:08 PM, bob wrote: > I'm glad you all love Linux so much. I said I like it too! But there are > some things that Windows does better for some users. Especially in the > workplace cubicle. ?If Linux was so superior, and FREE, then Microsoft > would not exist. ?Prove me wrong? You CAN'T prove me wrong, > > Windows will remain dominant until people admit Linux has faults and do > something about them. I'm not seeing that here! > > Now if you will excuse me, I have some documents that need to be scanned > and OCR'd. ?I will have to reboot to Windows. > > Live with it. > > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > From tclug at beitsahour.net Thu Feb 4 15:16:22 2010 From: tclug at beitsahour.net (Munir Nassar) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:16:22 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Samba: Shares work except printer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 22:07, Bill Ryce wrote: > Hello. > > I have a HP LaserJet attached to my Fedora server with typical > parallel/Centronix interface.?Users of the Linux box have no trouble > printing to it (Web browsers, Emacs, a2ps, etc.). This Fedora 12 Box is a > Samba server to my network. My problem with Samba is that shares work fine > except for printer shares.? I can browse directory shares with ease from a > Windows (Vista) machine. > > From windows explorer, I can see the printers configured on the Fedora Box, > but all attempts to connect give me a permissions error. > > I am now trying samba-swat, with its copious help text, but so far no luck > on the printer. > > I could go into more details, but this is a pretty vanilla set up, and I > hoped maybe someone else has already navigated around this problem. Ahh, printing with samba, always a delight :) are you using cups or lpr*? you need to tell samba something like: printing = cups printcap name = cups you also need to define two special shares, the [printers] share is a special share that automatically creates a share for each printer on your system. nifty eh? [printers] comment = All Printers browseable = no path = /var/spool/samba printable = yes guest ok = no read only = yes create mask = 0700 you also need the [print$] share, which is were windows drivers can be saved so that subsequest windows clients can install the printer without having to install the drivers [print$] comment = Printer Drivers path = /var/lib/samba/printers browseable = yes read only = yes guest ok = no you just need these two for basic printing to work, if you want to install the drivers create an smb password for your root user (smbpasswd -a root), and use that username to login to windows. now when you browse to the server you will see the printers listed and a "Printers" share, if you browse to the "Printers" share you will see the printers listed again, the difference is that these 2nd printers are on the server, right click on them and go to properties, in the driver tab ( i think, its been a while) you can add a windows driver for this printer. now when you browse to that printer from another windows workstation it should just add the printer without asking for the drivers. This really only works with the basic drivers, if the driver has a requirement for some application or other it will not work. most decent printers have an option to only install the network drivers. From cncole at earthlink.net Thu Feb 4 15:47:43 2010 From: cncole at earthlink.net (Chuck Cole) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:47:43 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.2.20100204135742.0258ba78@pop.mm.com> Message-ID: > -----Original Message----- > From: Dean.Benjamin at mm.com [mailto:Dean.Benjamin at mm.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 1:59 PM > To: Chuck Cole > > At 2/4/2010 01:15 PM, Chuck Cole wrote: > >I used to do math by rubbing two sticks together... > > No, that's how we used to start flame wars. > Beads -- that's how we did math. Your "we" is not my we. Presumptive to assume otherwise. I made no claim for what you did or could, and I didn't do flaming. Did you move on to an abacus after learning on beads? Chuck From ryanjcole at me.com Thu Feb 4 15:50:19 2010 From: ryanjcole at me.com (Ryan Coleman) Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:50:19 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4B6B411B.8070002@me.com> OK children, let's just drop the damn thing so those of us that use this list for learning and teaching can be given the chance to do so without having to delete the garbage? Chuck Cole wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dean.Benjamin at mm.com [mailto:Dean.Benjamin at mm.com] >> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 1:59 PM >> To: Chuck Cole >> >> At 2/4/2010 01:15 PM, Chuck Cole wrote: >> >>> I used to do math by rubbing two sticks together... >>> >> No, that's how we used to start flame wars. >> Beads -- that's how we did math. >> > > Your "we" is not my we. Presumptive to assume otherwise. I made no claim for what you did or could, and I didn't do flaming. Did > you move on to an abacus after learning on beads? > > > Chuck > > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > From larrymcmains at comcast.net Thu Feb 4 16:16:12 2010 From: larrymcmains at comcast.net (Larry McMains) Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:16:12 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Ubuntu Firewall Message-ID: <4B6B472C.7080503@comcast.net> I have two Ubuntu 9.10 systems on a local network provided by a Linksys router. I installed Firestarter on one of them and found that, as expected, it blocked access for file sharing by the other system. However, I tried adding rules to allow connections from the other system, and to allow specific service (SMB) requests from the other system, both by specific network address and by host name, each rule alone and both of them together. All combinations of neither, either, or both rules result in the other computer being blocked (if I turn off the firewall, access works fine, so the sharing part is set up correctly). I'm obviously missing something, any suggestions? Thanks - Larry McMains From florin at iucha.net Thu Feb 4 16:34:11 2010 From: florin at iucha.net (Florin Iucha) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:34:11 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Ubuntu Firewall In-Reply-To: <4B6B472C.7080503@comcast.net> References: <4B6B472C.7080503@comcast.net> Message-ID: <20100204223411.GF2519@iris.iucha.org> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 04:16:12PM -0600, Larry McMains wrote: > I have two Ubuntu 9.10 systems on a local network provided by a Linksys > router. I installed Firestarter on one of them and found that, as > expected, it blocked access for file sharing by the other system. > However, I tried adding rules to allow connections from the other > system, and to allow specific service (SMB) requests from the other > system, both by specific network address and by host name, each rule > alone and both of them together. All combinations of neither, either, or > both rules result in the other computer being blocked (if I turn off the > firewall, access works fine, so the sharing part is set up correctly). > I'm obviously missing something, any suggestions? Show us the rules, together with the output of '/sbin/iptables-save' . Cheers, florin -- Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition. http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100204/66cd3725/attachment-0001.pgp From blutgens at gmail.com Thu Feb 4 16:49:56 2010 From: blutgens at gmail.com (Ben) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:49:56 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Ubuntu Firewall In-Reply-To: <20100204223411.GF2519@iris.iucha.org> References: <4B6B472C.7080503@comcast.net> <20100204223411.GF2519@iris.iucha.org> Message-ID: Try ferm, i've never been fond of the GUI fw management tools. Ferm is awesome though. On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Florin Iucha wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 04:16:12PM -0600, Larry McMains wrote: > > I have two Ubuntu 9.10 systems on a local network provided by a Linksys > > router. I installed Firestarter on one of them and found that, as > > expected, it blocked access for file sharing by the other system. > > However, I tried adding rules to allow connections from the other > > system, and to allow specific service (SMB) requests from the other > > system, both by specific network address and by host name, each rule > > alone and both of them together. All combinations of neither, either, or > > both rules result in the other computer being blocked (if I turn off the > > firewall, access works fine, so the sharing part is set up correctly). > > I'm obviously missing something, any suggestions? > > Show us the rules, together with the output of '/sbin/iptables-save' . > > Cheers, > florin > > -- > Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition. > http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163 > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > -- Ben Lutgens Linux / Unix System Administror Three of your friends throw up after eating chicken salad. Do you think: "I should find more robust friends" or "we should check that refrigerator"? -- Donald Becker, on vortex-bug, suspecting a network-wide problem -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100204/95000512/attachment.htm From larrymcmains at comcast.net Thu Feb 4 19:17:20 2010 From: larrymcmains at comcast.net (Larry McMains) Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:17:20 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Ubuntu Firewall In-Reply-To: <20100204223411.GF2519@iris.iucha.org> References: <4B6B472C.7080503@comcast.net> <20100204223411.GF2519@iris.iucha.org> Message-ID: <4B6B71A0.8080804@comcast.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100204/4eb8905e/attachment.htm From nesius at gmail.com Thu Feb 4 20:34:02 2010 From: nesius at gmail.com (Robert Nesius) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 20:34:02 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: <1265226347.11760.57.camel@bob-old-desktop> References: <1265226347.11760.57.camel@bob-old-desktop> Message-ID: I was away from normal email, but when checking my inbox via my iPhone I was able to see a lot of messages on this thread. I thought "Wow, a lot of people sure are excited to talk about Linux!" I should have realized it was a flame war. I'd like to just take a moment to note a few things. * Re: Collusion between Intel and Microsoft to somehow harm Linux * Having just finished a twelve year tour at Intel where I maintained a distribution of Open Source tools across multiple Linux distros, and before that, multiple flavors of vendor-supported *nix, I can tell you this isn't true. If you think Microsoft and Intel get together for group love fests and anti-linux strategy sessions, think again. Microsoft and Intel are strategic partners. They will work with each other to when necessary to fix problems. Strategic business partners do that in every industry. Beyond that Intel doesn't give a damn how many PCs are running Windows, and how many are running Linux. What they care about is that it is Intel iron under the hood. Intel wised up very quickly to the fact that x86 architecture was the dominant architecture for Linux, and that a lot of big-iron companies were willing to embrace Linux because no one strictly controlled it. Linux is deemed very much a part of Intel's strategic plan - so much so quite a few of the top kernel developers are now employed at Intel in the Open Source Technology Labs. Moblin - Intel's SDK/OS for the Atom processor, is also part of the Open Source Technology Center and is fundamentally based on Linux. Where Intel has to tread carefully is that they cannot trumpet the virtues of Linux over Windows too loudly - to some degree their hands are tied. But in the market where Linux makes money - the enterprise computing environment - Linux wins the day on its own merits. Consider the fact that Bing runs over Linux clusters before disputing that claim too loudly. (Not to mention, check out the Halloween Documents.) Moving on to some of Bob's comments: On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 1:45 PM, bob wrote: > Although I loved Linux compared to DOS, there just wasn't any quality, > user friendly office productivity software. > At the time you performed this assessment, Linux was a home-brew attempt at providing a POSIX compliant kernel whose functionality was based on the design and principles of Unix, and whose goal was to be a "free Unix", in essence. Office productivity wasn't the goal of the GNU/Linux at that time, and the vast majority of its users would have you pry their emacs or vi editors from their cold, dead hands before they would resort to the steaming pile of stink that is Word. In short, your off-hand dismissive assessment is an apple's to oranges comparison based on ignorance. That doesn't make your observation any less valid objectively - or your decision to stick with windows any less logical. If I were in the same position I was in years ago, I would sill have to > go with Windows because of the lack of quality, user friendly > productivity software. AS much and as fast as Linux had evolved, it > still can't compete in the office environment with non-techie users. > Sadly, Windows can't compete in an office environment with non-techie users either. I support a predominantly windows environment for a concrete company now. I challenge you to find a less technical user base. Just today, while helping someone set up something as stupid-simple as an email signature, I ran into html rendering inconsistencies in two different Microsoft products that added up to some immense frustration. Now... if your complaint is that Word doesn't exist on Linux, well... that's partly true. You can run Word through Wine if you really want to. But that said, Open Office has met all of my WYSIWYG needs for office apps, and I'm convinced after two months of learning pains my support load would be lower if the environment was running over a good Linux distro. The most important point though, is that Linux lovers need to stop > arguing with me and fix the problems. If you don't, Linux will always > be inferior to Windows for the masses. But then.... isn't that what > some of you really want? > Bob, if you can't read this paragraph and see just how blindly conceited this is, then do me a favor. Open up your virtual suitcases, pack your things, and find another community to crap on. Kind regards, -Rob On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 1:45 PM, bob wrote: > I started using Linux back in the DOS days when the company I worked for > wanted me to study the differences between the new Microsoft Windows OS > that was just introduced, and Linux for the work place. > > Although I loved Linux compared to DOS, there just wasn't any quality, > user friendly office productivity software. > > About 2 years ago I heard of Ubuntu and gave it a try. WOW what a > difference. I am using Linux more and Windows less every day... on my > home computer. > > If I were in the same position I was in years ago, I would sill have to > go with Windows because of the lack of quality, user friendly > productivity software. AS much and as fast as Linux had evolved, it > still can't compete in the office environment with non-techie users. > > Give me some GOOD OCR software and much better hardware compatibility, > and I will change my mind, throw out Windows, and never look back! > > The most important point though, is that Linux lovers need to stop > arguing with me and fix the problems. If you don't, Linux will always > be inferior to Windows for the masses. But then.... isn't that what > some of you really want? > > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100204/a17f6246/attachment.htm From james007wjs at gmail.com Thu Feb 4 20:43:47 2010 From: james007wjs at gmail.com (wes smith) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 20:43:47 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? Message-ID: > Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 21:42:00 -0600 > From: "Jason Hsu, Linux user" > Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? > To: tclug-list at mn-linux.org > Message-ID: <20100202214200.005d4dcb.jhsu802701 at jasonhsu.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > When, why, and how did you start using Linux? > > I started using Linux 3 years ago. The reasons I started using Linux were: > 1. I had heard about how Windows was full of security holes. It also > seemed that security threats only grew over time. > 2. I had heard that support for Windows 98 (my main OS at the time) was > about to be terminated and that this was even more vulnerable to security > threats than Windows XP. I wasn't about to "upgrade" my main computer from > Windows 98 due to the expense and trouble of doing so. > 3. I heard that Windows Vista was nasty - a quantum leap forward in > bloatware that was slow even on many NEW computers. I also heard that Vista > didn't work with many items of older hardware like printers, scanners, etc. > 4. I'm cheap. My attitude towards computers can be summed up by, "If it > ain't broke, don't replace it." I didn't think Windows XP was that much > better than 98 or 98 that much better than 95. But I noticed that it took > more RAM, hard drive space, processor power, etc. to do exactly the same > things we had done 10 years earlier. At the same time, I noticed that there > weren't many killer apps (like the Internet in the 1990s), so I felt that we > should be able to keep using the same computer for 5-10 years. > 5. I'm green. I thought it was scandalous that so many computers get > trashed each year NOT because some critical component failed but because the > OS failed or was declared obsolete. To me, the only good reason to get rid > of a computer is because it breaks and cannot be repaired. > > So I bought a used IBM NetVista desktop computer (256 MB of RAM, 1 GHz > processor, 20 GB hard drive, built in 2001, originally equipped with Windows > 2000, which had been removed for sale) for $50 from a local used computer > dealer. I also bought a KVM switch so I could switch between the older > computer and the newer one. I used this newer used computer for going > online and used the old computer with Windows 98 strictly offline. (I still > have and use this old computer, which I bought new in 2000. It had a 466 > MHz processor and a 4.3 GB hard drive. It originally had just 128 MB of > RAM, but I upgraded it to 384 MB of RAM. I just recently replaced the > Windows 98 setup with Linux.) > > Over the last 3 years, I have been doing more and more stuff in Linux and > less and less in Windows. My first distro was Fedora Core 1, because the CD > came with the book _Linux For Non-Geeks_. Then I used Damn Small Linux, > Puppy Linux, and Ubuntu. (I dabbled with Debian but couldn't get it > configured properly.) I recently switched to antiX Linux. As I mentioned > before, it's the most lightweight and user-friendly distro with more than > 20,000 programs in the repository due to the Debian repository > compatibility. It's the best of both worlds. > > -- > Jason Hsu, Linux user > 1. linux is just as vulnerable just in different ways, there is also some really shitty nix's out there, most vendors know theres a bug or hole in there app / distro and are openly to help on patching it. Or there is an advisory, if you had enough understanding of the app you could patch it push it through. While M$ you have to wait month by month for patches to come through and depend on a corp to patch it for you, even if write a nice POC exploit and show them they will most likely ignore you. 99% of world uses M$, path of least resistance ftw, and adobe is about to pass M$ in exploits. 2. not upgrade because of a hassle and $$, peoples mindset on security is hopeless, ITS MAKES ME SAD! /me sad panda, it does make for a nice sized botnet 2-4 Moores law, about every 1.5 years processing power, memory capacity doubles or generally technology doubles every 2 years. Just go through the requirements of windows hmmmmm 98 released in may 1998 and xp released 2001 hmmmmm iirc the cpu skews the jump from 98 -> XP you were feed by the media just like anyone else in this crappy universe. You believe what they feed you and so does the norm. sad but true :( If you have knowledge you can trim down any OS You almost qualify to be a mac user. iMac therefore iSecure, lets not go there mac user are there own unique niche. sry to feed the trolls -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100204/460f3032/attachment-0001.htm From florin at iucha.net Thu Feb 4 23:23:23 2010 From: florin at iucha.net (Florin Iucha) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 23:23:23 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Ubuntu Firewall In-Reply-To: <4B6B71A0.8080804@comcast.net> References: <4B6B472C.7080503@comcast.net> <20100204223411.GF2519@iris.iucha.org> <4B6B71A0.8080804@comcast.net> Message-ID: <20100205052323.GI2519@iris.iucha.org> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 07:17:20PM -0600, Larry McMains wrote: > > > > > > > > With the rules:
> Allow connections from host
> 192.168.1.101

> and
> Allow Service  Port          For
> Samba(SMB)     137-139 445   192.168.1.101

>

> On the system attempting access, Network Tools, Devices, > Ethernet Interface (eth0), shows it's ipV4 address as 192.168.1.101.
> Places > Network  usually shows the target system, but double > clicking its icon results in the message "Failed to windows share".
Oh, my eyes! What I find puzzling is this: > -A INBOUND -s 192.168.1.101/32 -j ACCEPT > -A INBOUND -s 192.168.1.101/32 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 137:139 -j ACCEPT > -A INBOUND -s 192.168.1.101/32 -p udp -m udp --dport 137:139 -j ACCEPT > -A INBOUND -s 192.168.1.101/32 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 445 -j ACCEPT > -A INBOUND -s 192.168.1.101/32 -p udp -m udp --dport 445 -j ACCEPT It seems to match that you have both 'allow connections from 192.168.1.101' and 'allow certain ports from 192.168.1.101' enabled in your firewall tool. The first rule says that traffic from 192.168.1.101 should be accepted, so the next four rules seem superfluous. But I'm a bit rusty here, I gave up on raw iptables a few years ago and I'm using Shorewall now. My Shorewall setup says that for Samba you need the following ports: inbound udp 135,445 inbound udp 137:139 inbound udp 1024: source = 137 inbound tcp 135,139,445 If you check your logs, you should find the dropped packets. florin -- Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition. http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100204/fa80ddc0/attachment.pgp From mkebob1134 at netscape.net Fri Feb 5 09:34:59 2010 From: mkebob1134 at netscape.net (Mr. B-o-B) Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:34:59 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: <1265252900.3880.58.camel@bob-old-desktop> References: <1265252900.3880.58.camel@bob-old-desktop> Message-ID: <4B6C3AA3.5060708@netscape.net> On 2/3/2010 9:08 PM, bob wrote: > > Now if you will excuse me, I have some documents that need to be scanned > and OCR'd. I will have to reboot to Windows. > > Live with it. > http://pix.motivatedphotos.com/2010/2/4/634008838729541155-microsoft.jpg The picture speaks for itself! B-o-B From steventrapp at comcast.net Fri Feb 5 09:46:00 2010 From: steventrapp at comcast.net (Steven Trapp) Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:46:00 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4B6C3D38.7040404@comcast.net> All'y'all- I started using Linux when I noticed that it was a lot more fully developed than Minix was. Not that I ever got around to loading Minix. It was around late 1995 and I was using (MsDos and Win3.1) and kermit to TRY to work from home (telecommute). Work had mostly Sun workstations running SunOs for software development. But Linux had all the GNU stuff--gcc, perl, bash. I had a little help to figure out how to get ppp running. I used slackware I got off a CD-ROM bought at a shop near the University of MN. I was hooked! This is despite the hardware that I had at the time which was a 25MHz 386DX. I could run X in it but I couldn't run gcc in X (it'd thrash itself crazy). So I used virtual terminals up until I got a new system in 2001. But even under those limitations, it was a lot simpler telecommuting with (Linux + GNU) than with (MsDos + kermit + almostNoTools + Win3.1). Most of our software development was C, incidentally. Currently, I've been using ubuntu... Thanks, -Steve Steve Trapp, Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN, US My home page: http://home.comcast.net/~steventrapp steventrapp at \ comcast dot net is my e-mail address. :-) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100205/b5603fbe/attachment.htm From larrymcmains at comcast.net Fri Feb 5 10:04:09 2010 From: larrymcmains at comcast.net (Larry McMains) Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:04:09 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Ubuntu Firewall In-Reply-To: <20100205052323.GI2519@iris.iucha.org> References: <4B6B472C.7080503@comcast.net> <20100204223411.GF2519@iris.iucha.org> <4B6B71A0.8080804@comcast.net> <20100205052323.GI2519@iris.iucha.org> Message-ID: <4B6C4179.30509@comcast.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100205/efbe1b79/attachment.htm From nesius at gmail.com Fri Feb 5 10:43:12 2010 From: nesius at gmail.com (Robert Nesius) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:43:12 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Jobs/careers related to Linux In-Reply-To: <20100203221156.dcaba5dd.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> References: <20100203221156.dcaba5dd.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> Message-ID: On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Jason Hsu, Linux user < jhsu802701 at jasonhsu.com> wrote: > What types of jobs/careers involve using Linux? I'd like to hear from > those of you who use Linux on the job, whether Linux is your main job/career > or just one aspect of your job/career. > > Although I am currently seeking an embedded engineering position (working > with microcontrollers), I have also thought of turning Linux into a career > as well. An embedded engineering position at a workplace that uses Linux > would be a good way to combine the two. > Hi Jason, There are a lot of ways to "use Linux on the job" or be involved with Linux in an every day way. It really depends on what you like to do. Here are a few angles: But generally Linux oriented jobs can fall into two broad categories. Product development and support, and system administration/IT. If you think "I love Linux and I love embedded programming environments and I do that I'll be happy because I'm working on embedded Linux...." think again. Working with Linux will be, at best, 50% of what you love about your job. The things that make a job fun are: AAA (most important) ) Do I have a good manager? a) What are my hours? b) Do I have enough time to actually have a life? c) How well am I paid? d) Am I growing professionally? e) Is the culture at my place of employment positive? If you happen to find yourself doing any sort of product development, you will inevitably come up against a wall. That wall is the date manufacturing is supposed to start. And never, in 14 years in industry, have I seen a software/hardware project coast to completion "on time, on budget". (The best laid plans of mice and men...). What this translate into is a push to the finish line, and that push can last months, and those weeks can climb over 70 hours easily. And if you're on the critical path, you will likely not have a choice about those (especially if you're salaried, which you probably will be in a position like that.) So a question to ask yourself is: "Do I want to be on the critical path?" (It's not so bad if you're young and single. Just be careful not to wake up 10 years later and realize you're still single.) Also ask yourself "What's my next step?" If you don't know, that's bad. I personally was on both sides of the equation. Product Development/Critical Path, and system administration and mostly non-critical path work. Once I crossed over to the IT side of the world, I really had no desire to go back to product development and getting crushed by those sorts of deadlines and pushes. I like a steady 40-hour week that let's me plan things like familiy time and a social life. Anyway, good luck to you. I hope whatever you do makes you happy. -Rob -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100205/ff48d862/attachment.htm From mbmiller+l at gmail.com Fri Feb 5 10:47:09 2010 From: mbmiller+l at gmail.com (Mike Miller) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:47:09 -0600 (CST) Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: References: <1265226347.11760.57.camel@bob-old-desktop> Message-ID: On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Robert Nesius wrote: > Re: Collusion between Intel and Microsoft to somehow harm Linux * > Having just finished a twelve year tour at Intel where I maintained a > distribution of Open Source tools across multiple Linux distros, and before > that, multiple flavors of vendor-supported *nix, I can tell you this isn't > true. If you think Microsoft and Intel get together for group love fests > and anti-linux strategy sessions, think again. Microsoft and Intel are > strategic partners. They will work with each other to when necessary to fix > problems. Strategic business partners do that in every industry. Beyond > that Intel doesn't give a damn how many PCs are running Windows, and how > many are running Linux. Beyond that? Yes, they don't care about Linux and they do care about themselves. To the extent that Linux is in the way of Microsoft, Microsoft cares about it and will push Intel to do things that help Microsoft. It isn't so much about Linux as about how Microsoft and Intel work together -- two monopolies illegally colluding in their anti-competitive practices to promote their products. Intel has to do what Microsoft wants because if Intel produces a chip that doesn't run Windows, they are screwed. Whether an Intel chip will run Windows is Microsoft's decision. There are many web pages about it: http://www.google.com/search?q=microsoft+intel+collusion > What they care about is that it is Intel iron under the hood. Intel > wised up very quickly to the fact that x86 architecture was the dominant > architecture for Linux, and that a lot of big-iron companies were > willing to embrace Linux because no one strictly controlled it. Linux > is deemed very much a part of Intel's strategic plan - so much so quite > a few of the top kernel developers are now employed at Intel in the Open > Source Technology Labs. Moblin - Intel's SDK/OS for the Atom processor, > is also part of the Open Source Technology Center and is fundamentally > based on Linux. Interesting. > Where Intel has to tread carefully is that they cannot trumpet the > virtues of Linux over Windows too loudly - to some degree their hands > are tied. Exactly. Microsoft does favors for Intel: http://www.microsoft-watch.com/content/vista/microsoftintel_capable_collusion.html > But in the market where Linux makes money - the enterprise computing > environment - Linux wins the day on its own merits. Consider the fact > that Bing runs over Linux clusters before disputing that claim too > loudly. (Not to mention, check out the Halloween Documents.) I'll look for it. Mike From nesius at gmail.com Fri Feb 5 13:07:54 2010 From: nesius at gmail.com (Robert Nesius) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 13:07:54 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: References: <1265226347.11760.57.camel@bob-old-desktop> Message-ID: Hi Mike, On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Mike Miller > wrote: > On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Robert Nesius wrote: > > > Re: Collusion between Intel and Microsoft to somehow harm Linux * > > Having just finished a twelve year tour at Intel where I maintained a > > distribution of Open Source tools across multiple Linux distros, and > before > > that, multiple flavors of vendor-supported *nix, I can tell you this > isn't > > true. If you think Microsoft and Intel get together for group love fests > > and anti-linux strategy sessions, think again. Microsoft and Intel are > > strategic partners. They will work with each other to when necessary to > fix > > problems. Strategic business partners do that in every industry. > Beyond > > that Intel doesn't give a damn how many PCs are running Windows, and how > > many are running Linux. > > Beyond that? Yes, they don't care about Linux and they do care about > themselves. To the extent that Linux is in the way of Microsoft, > Microsoft cares about it and will push Intel to do things that help > Microsoft. I don't disagree with any of that. But before going into more detail, with all due respect you're using point-examples to draw broader conclusions that may or may not be true. > It isn't so much about Linux as about how Microsoft and Intel > work together -- two monopolies illegally colluding in their > anti-competitive practices to promote their products. > Microsoft is a documented Monopoly. Intel is an effective Monopoly (they haven't been judged as such by a court yet, to my knowledge). > Intel has to do what Microsoft wants How do you mean that? That Intel is at the mercy of Microsoft and has no choice? Or that Intel has to take Microsoft seriously? > because if Intel produces a chip that doesn't run > Windows, they are screwed. > /me points to the Itanium, Atom, and ARM (before they sold ARM off again). Whether an Intel chip will run Windows is Microsoft's decision. > Not true. The degree to which iterations of the x86 family of microprocessors are backwards compatible is ultimately Intel's decision. But the decision is made for them in essence by the market (the demand for backwards compatibility). This isn't just driven by windows, but by every x86 object file compiled over the past 15 years or so. By the way, this includes all of the XCOFF's and ELF's compiled with GCC over Linux. > There are many web pages about it: > > http://www.google.com/search?q=microsoft+intel+collusion > > That's not proof of your argument. I clicked through your link and scanned the articles. But if you'll accept google search results as proof of a point, here's one for you. ;-) http://www.google.com/search?q=proof+of+existence+of+god > > Where Intel has to tread carefully is that they cannot trumpet the > > virtues of Linux over Windows too loudly - to some degree their hands > > are tied. > > Exactly. Microsoft does favors for Intel: What I meant is that Intel can't promote sales of chips by saying Linux is better than Windows. I don't believe they say the opposite either. What they do say is, famously during one add campaign, is that Intel processors make your Internet faster. ;-) > > http://www.microsoft-watch.com/content/vista/microsoftintel_capable_collusion.html > > You're using this as a proof point for a broader allegation, but I don't think the way you paint the business relationship is accurate. It's not "buddy buddy". It's more like the antagonist and protagonist in a John Woo movie finding themselves at arms length with guns pointed at each others heads. Both companies have the ability to do tremendous harm to each other - the degree to which they don't is simple game theory - the outcome would be lose-lose. You could argue "Proof of collusion"! I'd say "strong reasons to cooperate." Weather they cross the line at some point into collusion and criminal activity is not for me to say. And even if they do, I can assure you that relationship is not nearly as chummy as you allege. Microsoft hates the x86 platform being dominated by one player. That's why they have supported some different micro-architectures over the years, mainly as insurance and leverage against Intel. None of them really took off... Didn't Windows 98 and perhaps XP supported a RISC architecture from NEC (I can't remember the name of it and couldn't google it. I do know Intel purchased that FAB from NEC as part of a settlement with NEC, and I think that FAB is where the chip was manufactured.) You also specifically point to the events surrounding Vista's roll-out and Vista-capable certification. But I think think that scenario is a bit misunderstood. Microsoft wanted to set minimum standards for capability so that people wouldn't run Vista + Aero on older hardware and say "Vista sucks because it's slow" when really it is the hardware that is slow. But you can turn Aero off and run Vista just fine. Microsoft's initial certification based on running Aero suddenly pulled the rug out from under one of Intel's chipsets that was in the middle of its life cycle. Intel said "Hey, what gives?" and Microsoft conceded the chipset can run Vista without Aero, and can chug along with Aero passably. Did they collude? I just truly don't know. It could be a court rules they did collude, but even if that happens I don't think that validates the broader conspiracy you seem to be hinting at. If anything, I think it shows Microsoft has to do what Intel says too, which goes against your assertion earlier? > > But in the market where Linux makes money - the enterprise computing > > environment - Linux wins the day on its own merits. Consider the fact > > that Bing runs over Linux clusters before disputing that claim too > > loudly. (Not to mention, check out the Halloween Documents.) > > I'll look for it. > > Here is a good starting point. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Halloween_documents_leak http://www.opensource-definition.org/halloween/halloween1.html -Rob -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100205/509c76d9/attachment.htm From larrymcmains at comcast.net Fri Feb 5 19:13:38 2010 From: larrymcmains at comcast.net (Larry McMains) Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:13:38 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Ubuntu Firewall In-Reply-To: <4B6C4179.30509@comcast.net> References: <4B6B472C.7080503@comcast.net> <20100204223411.GF2519@iris.iucha.org> <4B6B71A0.8080804@comcast.net> <20100205052323.GI2519@iris.iucha.org> <4B6C4179.30509@comcast.net> Message-ID: <4B6CC242.8040006@comcast.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100205/1b654293/attachment.htm From chewie at wookimus.net Sat Feb 6 01:34:41 2010 From: chewie at wookimus.net (Chad Walstrom) Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 01:34:41 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] When, why, and how did you start using Linux? In-Reply-To: <20100202214200.005d4dcb.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> References: <20100202214200.005d4dcb.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> Message-ID: <20144.1265441681@skuld.wookimus.net> First Linux Install: 1997 - Red Hat 4.2. Dual-boot w/Win 95. First Serious Use At Work: 1998 - Debian on a 486 w/2 ISA cards to replace a $3000 Windows NT firewall First Time I Removed Windows Completely: 1999 - Tired of BSoD's of Win '98 Day I wet back to a commercial OS as my primary desktop... still have't. Fun times! :) Chad From tclug at freakzilla.com Tue Feb 9 18:35:46 2010 From: tclug at freakzilla.com (Yaron) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 18:35:46 -0600 (CST) Subject: [tclug-list] Linux on a USB thumbdrive Message-ID: Hi all, Has anyone here played with Linux on a USB thumbdrive? It seems more convenient to me than carrying a LiveCD around, plus you can, you know, save personalised settings. I've been trying for a few days and have had... mixed results. I've managed to get Ubuntu to make a copy of it's LiveCD on a thumbdrive, but then you end up with an Ubuntu Live CD. Which would be better than nothing, except even THAT doesn't always boot up all the way. I've tried plain ol' installing Ubuntu on the thumbdrive (even going so far as to remove the other harddrives from the system) but that won't boot all the way, either - they get stuck on the splash screen somewhere (even when I take "quiet" out of grub). I know about Damn Small Linux, but I'd rather have a system thats a biiit more current than 2.4 kernels and Firefox 2.0. Anyone have any experiences? -Yaron -- From florin at iucha.net Tue Feb 9 18:54:50 2010 From: florin at iucha.net (Florin Iucha) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 18:54:50 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Linux on a USB thumbdrive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100210005450.GZ2519@iris.iucha.org> On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 06:35:46PM -0600, Yaron wrote: > Has anyone here played with Linux on a USB thumbdrive? It seems more > convenient to me than carrying a LiveCD around, plus you can, you know, > save personalised settings. How much Linux to you need? I'm using SystemRescueCD [1] on an USB drive and it comes with Firefox, a few text editors. I doubt running OpenOffice from a cheap USB drive would be a satisfying experience. I've heard that Knoppix might let you install on USB, but I haven't tried it myself. Cheers, florin 1: http://www.sysresccd.org/ -- Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition. http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100209/296042d2/attachment.pgp From max at bernsteinforpresident.com Tue Feb 9 19:00:30 2010 From: max at bernsteinforpresident.com (Max Shinn) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 19:00:30 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Linux on a USB thumbdrive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201002091900.31065.max@bernsteinforpresident.com> > Anyone have any experiences? I have done a number of installations of GNU/Linux onto a thumb drive. It is always handy to have a copy of RIPLinux (especially) in your pocket. Since you seem to want a full distro, though, I recommend you try RMS GNU/Linux (http://rmsgnulinux.org/) RMS GNU/Linux is based on Slax, which is a distribution specifically for thumb drives. It should be much more trivial to install than Ubuntu. You just extract the archive to the drive, and then run an automated script which will set up the drive to be bootable. Please let us know if it works. -Max From jhsu802701 at jasonhsu.com Tue Feb 9 19:01:32 2010 From: jhsu802701 at jasonhsu.com (Jason Hsu, Linux user) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 19:01:32 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Linux on a USB thumbdrive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100209190132.dac347a9.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> I haven't installed Linux onto a USB FLASH drive, but I know that there are people out there who have. You can go to that distro's forum and ask how to do this. Have you tried Puppy Linux or antiX Linux? Puppy Linux is user-friendly and very lightweight - not much more than 100MB. The full installation of antiX Linux would take up something like 430 MB on the USB drive, but its speed is competitive with Puppy Linux. antiX Linux really blows away Puppy Linux in the software repository. I don't like Ubuntu because it's too slow and bloated, but then, my computers have only 256-384 MB of RAM. Those with 1 GB of RAM or more would beg to differ. Ubuntu has its merits, but operation on a slow machine and quick installation times are NOT among them. So I don't think it would be suitable for a live CD or booting from the USB drive. On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 18:35:46 -0600 (CST) Yaron wrote: > Hi all, > > Has anyone here played with Linux on a USB thumbdrive? It seems more > convenient to me than carrying a LiveCD around, plus you can, you know, > save personalised settings. > > I've been trying for a few days and have had... mixed results. I've > managed to get Ubuntu to make a copy of it's LiveCD on a thumbdrive, but > then you end up with an Ubuntu Live CD. Which would be better than > nothing, except even THAT doesn't always boot up all the way. > > I've tried plain ol' installing Ubuntu on the thumbdrive (even going so > far as to remove the other harddrives from the system) but that won't boot > all the way, either - they get stuck on the splash screen somewhere (even > when I take "quiet" out of grub). > > I know about Damn Small Linux, but I'd rather have a system thats a biiit > more current than 2.4 kernels and Firefox 2.0. > > Anyone have any experiences? > > > -Yaron > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list -- Jason Hsu, Linux user From tclug at freakzilla.com Tue Feb 9 20:09:00 2010 From: tclug at freakzilla.com (Yaron) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 20:09:00 -0600 (CST) Subject: [tclug-list] Linux on a USB thumbdrive In-Reply-To: <20100210005450.GZ2519@iris.iucha.org> References: <20100210005450.GZ2519@iris.iucha.org> Message-ID: On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, Florin Iucha wrote: > On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 06:35:46PM -0600, Yaron wrote: > How much Linux to you need? I'm using SystemRescueCD [1] on an USB > drive and it comes with Firefox, a few text editors. I doubt running > OpenOffice from a cheap USB drive would be a satisfying experience. Well, first of all I can get an expensive USB thumbdrive (; I don't think the thumb drive would be a problem with running OpenOffice, to be honest. I mean if it's booting on a halfway decent machine it'll be fine. And it'd be a nice option to have it. What I really need, though, is Firefox and a terminal. Be nice to have something that'll autoconfigure on just about any hardware I plug the thing in - including being able to use whatever wifi adapter we might run into! That's one of the reasons I liked Ubuntu - thing just worked. I can definitely look into Knoppix. -Yaron -- From ron.e.nelson at gmail.com Tue Feb 9 20:13:46 2010 From: ron.e.nelson at gmail.com (Ron Nelson) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 20:13:46 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Linux on a USB thumbdrive In-Reply-To: <20100209190132.dac347a9.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> References: <20100209190132.dac347a9.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> Message-ID: I've had success running?http://www.backtrack-linux.org/?from the USB drive with files/state/updates all to the flash drive. Not too bad for general-purpose use even. Ron On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Jason Hsu, Linux user wrote: > > I haven't installed Linux onto a USB FLASH drive, but I know that there are people out there who have. ?You can go to that distro's forum and ask how to do this. > > Have you tried Puppy Linux or antiX Linux? ?Puppy Linux is user-friendly and very lightweight - not much more than 100MB. ?The full installation of antiX Linux would take up something like 430 MB on the USB drive, but its speed is competitive with Puppy Linux. ?antiX Linux really blows away Puppy Linux in the software repository. > > I don't like Ubuntu because it's too slow and bloated, but then, my computers have only 256-384 MB of RAM. ?Those with 1 GB of RAM or more would beg to differ. ?Ubuntu has its merits, but operation on a slow machine and quick installation times are NOT among them. ?So I don't think it would be suitable for a live CD or booting from the USB drive. > > On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 18:35:46 -0600 (CST) > Yaron wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Has anyone here played with Linux on a USB thumbdrive? It seems more > > convenient to me than carrying a LiveCD around, plus you can, you know, > > save personalised settings. > > > > I've been trying for a few days and have had... mixed results. I've > > managed to get Ubuntu to make a copy of it's LiveCD on a thumbdrive, but > > then you end up with an Ubuntu Live CD. Which would be better than > > nothing, except even THAT doesn't always boot up all the way. > > > > I've tried plain ol' installing Ubuntu on the thumbdrive (even going so > > far as to remove the other harddrives from the system) but that won't boot > > all the way, either - they get stuck on the splash screen somewhere (even > > when I take "quiet" out of grub). > > > > I know about Damn Small Linux, but I'd rather have a system thats a biiit > > more current than 2.4 kernels and Firefox 2.0. > > > > Anyone have any experiences? > > > > > > -Yaron > > > > -- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > > -- > Jason Hsu, Linux user > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list -- http://ronspace.org/ From tclug at freakzilla.com Tue Feb 9 20:15:45 2010 From: tclug at freakzilla.com (Yaron) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 20:15:45 -0600 (CST) Subject: [tclug-list] Linux on a USB thumbdrive (fwd) Message-ID: On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, Jason Hsu, Linux user wrote: > Have you tried Puppy Linux or antiX Linux? Puppy Linux is user-friendly and > very lightweight - not much more than 100MB. Oh, I don't really need it to be that lightweight. Even a modest thumbdrive is like 8 gigs by now. So I don't feel the need to give up on the latest-and-greatest versions of some things. > I don't like Ubuntu because it's too slow and bloated, but then, my computers > have only 256-384 MB of RAM. Those with 1 GB of RAM or more would beg to > differ. Yeah, I'd be one of those people. I'm not trying to build a lightweight Linux install - I just want to have a nice portable Linux install I can take with when I'll be at other peoples' place and I don't want to have to use their system. I don't really worry about having to run it on really old machines. -Yaron -- From dean at ripperd.com Tue Feb 9 20:46:11 2010 From: dean at ripperd.com (Dean) Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:46:11 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Linux on a USB thumbdrive (fwd) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4B721DF3.1080201@ripperd.com> Ubuntu is the way to go with this. Firefox, terminals, gparted, ntfsresize, ssh, fdisk, etc. All the tools you typically need to use from a usb stick. Not only that, but within the live USB environment, if you have a working internet connection you can apt-get install whatever application you need. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_Live_USB_creator From justin.kremer at gmail.com Tue Feb 9 22:01:27 2010 From: justin.kremer at gmail.com (Justin Kremer) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 22:01:27 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Linux on a USB thumbdrive In-Reply-To: References: <20100210005450.GZ2519@iris.iucha.org> Message-ID: <27e6356a1002092001s243ef77l143b5c01d6a74204@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Yaron wrote: > I don't think the thumb drive would be a problem with running OpenOffice, > to be honest. I mean if it's booting on a halfway decent machine it'll be > fine. And it'd be a nice option to have it. > > What I really need, though, is Firefox and a terminal. Be nice to have > something that'll autoconfigure on just about any hardware I plug the > thing in - including being able to use whatever wifi adapter we might run > into! That's one of the reasons I liked Ubuntu - thing just worked. Hmm, I'm seeing mixed signals here. What specifically about the Ubuntu live CD on the thumbdrive didn't work for you? And was it just the wifi you're referring to that "just worked"? I'm a bit shocked because I use thumbdrives with Ubuntu 9.04 x86_64 pretty much daily at work to test systems, and it is quite rare that I find systems that don't boot properly. I used the USB Startup Disk Creator that is in the Administration menu of Ubuntu by default. I'm still using 9.04 only because 9.10 doesn't seem to like using the "TORAM" boot option, and I haven't had time to figure out why. And if you aren't aware, that option is very nice because you can boot off the thumbdrive, and then as soon as you get up to the desktop, you can tell it to unmount the thumbdrive and run completely off RAM. I don't advise trying that in a system with less than 2GB of RAM, though. Not a problem for me, since most of the systems I test have a bare minimum of 4GB. With that last bit aside, I believe when you use the built in USB Startup Disk Creator, it gives you an option to set aside a portion of the thumdrive's capacity to store changes. If you choose to do that, changes you make to your user account should be persistent. I'm not sure if it goes so far as to save installed packages, but it should at least save any changes you make to the UI for the next time you boot. - Justin From j at packetgod.com Tue Feb 9 22:00:22 2010 From: j at packetgod.com (J Cruit) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 22:00:22 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Linux on a USB thumbdrive (fwd) In-Reply-To: <4B721DF3.1080201@ripperd.com> References: <4B721DF3.1080201@ripperd.com> Message-ID: <38aa5b6a1002092000j9138802m36af2be94f25c9c3@mail.gmail.com> I've used most types of Linux on a thumbdrive and they all work pretty well. In fact in the wireless hacking courses we taught they were all done using live Backtrack distros running off of USB. For really making things easy check out unetbooten... point and click USB distro, even under Windows. --j On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Dean wrote: > Ubuntu is the way to go with this. Firefox, terminals, gparted, > ntfsresize, ssh, fdisk, etc. All the tools you typically need to use > from a usb stick. Not only that, but within the live USB environment, if > you have a working internet connection you can apt-get install whatever > application you need. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_Live_USB_creator > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100209/74eff869/attachment-0001.htm From tclug at freakzilla.com Wed Feb 10 00:40:11 2010 From: tclug at freakzilla.com (Yaron) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:40:11 -0600 (CST) Subject: [tclug-list] Linux on a USB thumbdrive In-Reply-To: <27e6356a1002092001s243ef77l143b5c01d6a74204@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100210005450.GZ2519@iris.iucha.org> <27e6356a1002092001s243ef77l143b5c01d6a74204@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, Justin Kremer wrote: > Hmm, I'm seeing mixed signals here. > What specifically about the Ubuntu live CD on the thumbdrive didn't > work for you? And was it just the wifi you're referring to that "just > worked"? WiFi on Linux has been a thorn in my side for YEARS, so to have it just friggin WORK on Ubuntu was a big deal for me. The Ubuntu Live CD on a USB Thumbdrive worked fine until I did a dist-upgrade. Then it wouldn't bootup anymore. I also don't like that it offers the live CD install options on boot-up and is, in fact, slower than all hell. Knoppix on a thumbdrive which boots up in like two minutes. Ubuntu takes about TEN (keep in mind I am testing this on a not-super-new laptop). I'd also have to rip out the live CD user and create my own user, etc, etc. I'd much rather just have a regular Ubuntu install. And yeah, I am using the startup usb disk creator from the Ubuntu Live CD menu. -Yaron -- From ronsmailbox5 at gmail.com Wed Feb 10 02:54:38 2010 From: ronsmailbox5 at gmail.com (r j) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:54:38 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] tclug-list Digest, Vol 62, Issue 12 linux thumdrive Message-ID: <25f02f41002100054k3946d28l6ac0754851c1e6bd@mail.gmail.com> I have had success with Unetbootin and many Linux distrobutions. you can partition the drive so you can save in free space. The fedora 12 on a usb will make default storage for you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100210/97c803d7/attachment.htm From justin.kremer at gmail.com Wed Feb 10 08:58:24 2010 From: justin.kremer at gmail.com (Justin Kremer) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:58:24 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Linux on a USB thumbdrive In-Reply-To: References: <20100210005450.GZ2519@iris.iucha.org> <27e6356a1002092001s243ef77l143b5c01d6a74204@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <27e6356a1002100658i7b291d2cqbd530c552c62d35a@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Yaron wrote: > WiFi on Linux has been a thorn in my side for YEARS, so to have it just > friggin WORK on Ubuntu was a big deal for me. I agree. I find it refreshing to be able to pop my Ubuntu thumbdrive into ALMOST anything and have working networking as soon as the desktop comes up. > The Ubuntu Live CD on a USB Thumbdrive worked fine until I did a > dist-upgrade. Then it wouldn't bootup anymore. It may be that it doesn't know what to do when you install a new kernel. Have you tried running an upgrade instead of dist-upgrade? I'm in the process of trying that right now. > I also don't like that it > offers the live CD install options on boot-up and is, in fact, slower than > all hell. Knoppix on a thumbdrive which boots up in like two minutes. > Ubuntu takes about TEN (keep in mind I am testing this on a not-super-new > laptop). I'd also have to rip out the live CD user and create my own user, > etc, etc. I'd much rather just have a regular Ubuntu install. I don't know that there is any way to modify the boot menu options, but I just tried and I was able to add a real user to one of my thumbdrives and customize the interface, and at the next boot everything stuck - including the key for the wireless network I joined. You may want to consider getting a better thumbdrive, as someone else mentioned. The laptop that I just tested this on isn't really old, but it certainly isn't top of the line. 1GB RAM and 2ghz Core (not 2) Duo. It took a minute and a half from the time I hit Enter at the boot menu until the login screen came up, since I told it NOT to auto login, and that's not bad for this type of media. - Justin From bure4czar at msn.com Wed Feb 10 11:11:02 2010 From: bure4czar at msn.com (Rick Blevins) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:11:02 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Linux on a USB thumbdrive In-Reply-To: References: , <20100209190132.dac347a9.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com>, Message-ID: I just finished installing Puppy Arcade on flash drive. Worked perfectly, comes with an installer that you run from windows, reboot then you're done. Haven't explored the features yet. But the space invaders desktop is pretty sharp. http://www.pendrivelinux.com/install-puppy-arcade-to-a-flash-drive-from-windows/ > Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 20:13:46 -0600 > From: ron.e.nelson at gmail.com > To: tclug at freakzilla.com > CC: tclug-list at mn-linux.org > Subject: Re: [tclug-list] Linux on a USB thumbdrive > > I've had success running http://www.backtrack-linux.org/ from the USB > drive with files/state/updates all to the flash drive. Not too bad > for general-purpose use even. > > Ron > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Jason Hsu, Linux user > wrote: > > > > I haven't installed Linux onto a USB FLASH drive, but I know that there are people out there who have. You can go to that distro's forum and ask how to do this. > > > > Have you tried Puppy Linux or antiX Linux? Puppy Linux is user-friendly and very lightweight - not much more than 100MB. The full installation of antiX Linux would take up something like 430 MB on the USB drive, but its speed is competitive with Puppy Linux. antiX Linux really blows away Puppy Linux in the software repository. > > > > I don't like Ubuntu because it's too slow and bloated, but then, my computers have only 256-384 MB of RAM. Those with 1 GB of RAM or more would beg to differ. Ubuntu has its merits, but operation on a slow machine and quick installation times are NOT among them. So I don't think it would be suitable for a live CD or booting from the USB drive. > > > > On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 18:35:46 -0600 (CST) > > Yaron wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Has anyone here played with Linux on a USB thumbdrive? It seems more > > > convenient to me than carrying a LiveCD around, plus you can, you know, > > > save personalised settings. > > > > > > I've been trying for a few days and have had... mixed results. I've > > > managed to get Ubuntu to make a copy of it's LiveCD on a thumbdrive, but > > > then you end up with an Ubuntu Live CD. Which would be better than > > > nothing, except even THAT doesn't always boot up all the way. > > > > > > I've tried plain ol' installing Ubuntu on the thumbdrive (even going so > > > far as to remove the other harddrives from the system) but that won't boot > > > all the way, either - they get stuck on the splash screen somewhere (even > > > when I take "quiet" out of grub). > > > > > > I know about Damn Small Linux, but I'd rather have a system thats a biiit > > > more current than 2.4 kernels and Firefox 2.0. > > > > > > Anyone have any experiences? > > > > > > > > > -Yaron > > > > > > -- > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > > > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > > > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > > > > > -- > > Jason Hsu, Linux user > > > > _______________________________________________ > > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > > > -- > http://ronspace.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list _________________________________________________________________ Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469229/direct/01/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100210/0efb6981/attachment.htm From tclug at freakzilla.com Wed Feb 10 11:15:11 2010 From: tclug at freakzilla.com (Yaron) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:15:11 -0600 (CST) Subject: [tclug-list] Linux on a USB thumbdrive In-Reply-To: References: , <20100209190132.dac347a9.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com>, Message-ID: On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Rick Blevins wrote: > I just finished installing Puppy?Arcade on flash drive. Worked perfectly, > comes with an installer that you run from?windows, reboot then you're done. That's actually one of the things that's kinda bugging me about this whole thing - a hle lot of these have Windows-based installers and Windows-based instructions. I don't have any Windows machines I can use for that! -Yaron -- From mbmiller+l at gmail.com Wed Feb 10 12:46:31 2010 From: mbmiller+l at gmail.com (Mike Miller) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:46:31 -0600 (CST) Subject: [tclug-list] installing Ubuntu from thumb drive Message-ID: I have installed Ubuntu from a thumb drive and it was pretty smooth and easy. I did it once because I had no CD drive on a netbook and wanted Ubuntu Netbook Remix, and another time on a laptop with a flakey CD drive. The thing is, I used Ubuntu on another machine to make the USB, but I want to tell a friend far away using only Windows how he can do this. Do you know of good instructions on how to make the Ubuntu installation thumb drive from a Windows box? By the way, a young guy with a BA in Math told me he wanted to be a scientist so I told him that step #1 was to get rid of Windows, use Ubuntu and start learning R, bash, emacs, and so on. I think Python would be a good idea too, but he's working mostly on stats right now and we don't want to do everything at once. Funny thing is he already was using OpenOffice, GIMP, Firefox/Tbird and a bunch of other free software under Windows, so he has no real Windows-dependency problem. He's the guy who needs the thumb drive. Mike From jhsu802701 at jasonhsu.com Wed Feb 10 13:13:50 2010 From: jhsu802701 at jasonhsu.com (Jason Hsu, Linux user) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:13:50 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Programming PIC microcontrollers Message-ID: <20100210131350.bd5496e8.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> If you are an electrical engineer or electronics hobbyist interested in programming PIC microcontrollers with C source code in Linux instead of Windows, I have been able to get things working in antiX Linux M8.2 with MPLAB version 8.43 (with HI-TECH PICC 9.70) in WINE 1.0.1-1. This combination gives me all of the functionality I had in Windows without requiring the use of Windows. I tried using open source software in Linux (SDCC, GPSIM, PikLab/KTechLab) but kept running into problems. The arrow pointing to the line of code never showed up when using GPSIM to simulate C code. I also ran into issues like limitations in the selection of microcontrollers supported. I admire what the open source developers are doing, but their work is not yet ready for prime time. I had difficulty in the past trying to program microcontrollers with C source code in Puppy Linux. I'm not sure if the issue was the older version of WINE, the older version of MPLAB (before HI-TECH PICC was integrated into MPLAB), or Puppy Linux itself. -- Jason Hsu, Linux user From ronsmailbox5 at gmail.com Thu Feb 11 12:18:19 2010 From: ronsmailbox5 at gmail.com (r j) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:18:19 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] tclug-list to mike on win creating Ubuntu thumb drives Message-ID: <25f02f41002111018r17df9c76hd57778522f026a41@mail.gmail.com> This will create thumb drives on windows and linux. http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/ On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:00 PM, wrote: > Send tclug-list mailing list submissions to > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > tclug-list-request at mn-linux.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > tclug-list-owner at mn-linux.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of tclug-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. installing Ubuntu from thumb drive (Mike Miller) > 2. Programming PIC microcontrollers (Jason Hsu, Linux user) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:46:31 -0600 (CST) > From: Mike Miller > > Subject: [tclug-list] installing Ubuntu from thumb drive > To: TCLUG List > Message-ID: > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII > > I have installed Ubuntu from a thumb drive and it was pretty smooth and > easy. I did it once because I had no CD drive on a netbook and wanted > Ubuntu Netbook Remix, and another time on a laptop with a flakey CD drive. > The thing is, I used Ubuntu on another machine to make the USB, but I want > to tell a friend far away using only Windows how he can do this. Do you > know of good instructions on how to make the Ubuntu installation thumb > drive from a Windows box? > > By the way, a young guy with a BA in Math told me he wanted to be a > scientist so I told him that step #1 was to get rid of Windows, use Ubuntu > and start learning R, bash, emacs, and so on. I think Python would be a > good idea too, but he's working mostly on stats right now and we don't > want to do everything at once. Funny thing is he already was using > OpenOffice, GIMP, Firefox/Tbird and a bunch of other free software under > Windows, so he has no real Windows-dependency problem. He's the guy who > needs the thumb drive. > > Mike > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:13:50 -0600 > From: "Jason Hsu, Linux user" > Subject: [tclug-list] Programming PIC microcontrollers > To: tclug-list at mn-linux.org > Message-ID: <20100210131350.bd5496e8.jhsu802701 at jasonhsu.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > If you are an electrical engineer or electronics hobbyist interested in > programming PIC microcontrollers with C source code in Linux instead of > Windows, I have been able to get things working in antiX Linux M8.2 with > MPLAB version 8.43 (with HI-TECH PICC 9.70) in WINE 1.0.1-1. This > combination gives me all of the functionality I had in Windows without > requiring the use of Windows. > > I tried using open source software in Linux (SDCC, GPSIM, PikLab/KTechLab) > but kept running into problems. The arrow pointing to the line of code > never showed up when using GPSIM to simulate C code. I also ran into issues > like limitations in the selection of microcontrollers supported. I admire > what the open source developers are doing, but their work is not yet ready > for prime time. > > I had difficulty in the past trying to program microcontrollers with C > source code in Puppy Linux. I'm not sure if the issue was the older version > of WINE, the older version of MPLAB (before HI-TECH PICC was integrated into > MPLAB), or Puppy Linux itself. > > -- > Jason Hsu, Linux user > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > End of tclug-list Digest, Vol 62, Issue 14 > ****************************************** > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100211/e3c363b2/attachment.htm From mbmiller+l at gmail.com Thu Feb 11 23:19:12 2010 From: mbmiller+l at gmail.com (Mike Miller) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:19:12 -0600 (CST) Subject: [tclug-list] tclug-list to mike on win creating Ubuntu thumb drives In-Reply-To: <25f02f41002111018r17df9c76hd57778522f026a41@mail.gmail.com> References: <25f02f41002111018r17df9c76hd57778522f026a41@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, r j wrote: > This will create thumb drives on windows and linux. > http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/ Perfect. Thanks. That looks like a really nice program. Mike From stutterstutt at comcast.net Thu Feb 11 23:33:14 2010 From: stutterstutt at comcast.net (Jeff Nelson) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:33:14 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] installing Ubuntu from thumb drive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4B74E81A.8010408@comcast.net> Mike Miller wrote: > Do you > know of good instructions on how to make the Ubuntu installation thumb > drive from a Windows box? http://wubi-installer.org/ http://lifehacker.com/5195999/portable-ubuntu-runs-ubuntu-inside-windows http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/virtualbox Any one of these web pages give instructions on how to run Ubuntu on top of Windows. Once Ubuntu is up, you can make a live USB stick. -Jeff From nesius at gmail.com Thu Feb 11 23:42:07 2010 From: nesius at gmail.com (Robert Nesius) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:42:07 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] installing Ubuntu from thumb drive In-Reply-To: <4B74E81A.8010408@comcast.net> References: <4B74E81A.8010408@comcast.net> Message-ID: I'll vouch for ubuntu over virtualbox - it's worked flawlessly. -Rob On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Jeff Nelson wrote: > Mike Miller wrote: > > Do you > > know of good instructions on how to make the Ubuntu installation thumb > > drive from a Windows box? > > http://wubi-installer.org/ > http://lifehacker.com/5195999/portable-ubuntu-runs-ubuntu-inside-windows > http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/virtualbox > > Any one of these web pages give instructions on how to run Ubuntu on top > of Windows. Once Ubuntu is up, you can make a live USB stick. > > -Jeff > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100211/2b30c18d/attachment.htm From jpschewe at mtu.net Fri Feb 12 17:58:16 2010 From: jpschewe at mtu.net (Jon Schewe) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:58:16 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Problem with Linux bridge and IPv6 Message-ID: <4B75EB18.1030208@mtu.net> I've got a setup with Xen using bridging. The host is OpenSUSE Linux, the guest is NetBSD. I have a bridge named br0 that bridges eth0 (my physical interface) and vif22.0 (the interface for the NetBSD guest). My NetBSD guest sends out an IPv6 packet. If I tcpdump on the network interface inside the guest, I see the packet go out. If I tcpdump on vif22.0 I see the packet, if I tcpdump on br0 I see the packet. If I tcpdump on eth0 I don't see the packet. This means the packet isn't going on the wire and it should. This all works fine with IPv4. Any ideas? -- Jon Schewe | http://mtu.net/~jpschewe If you see an attachment named signature.asc, this is my digital signature. See http://www.gnupg.org for more information. For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord. - Romans 8:38-39 From tmarble at info9.net Fri Feb 12 18:51:40 2010 From: tmarble at info9.net (Tom Marble) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:51:40 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Problem with Linux bridge and IPv6 In-Reply-To: <4B75EB18.1030208@mtu.net> References: <4B75EB18.1030208@mtu.net> Message-ID: <4B75F79C.2080309@info9.net> Jon Schewe wrote: > I've got a setup with Xen using bridging. The host is OpenSUSE Linux, > the guest is NetBSD. I have a bridge named br0 that bridges eth0 (my > physical interface) and vif22.0 (the interface for the NetBSD guest). My > NetBSD guest sends out an IPv6 packet. If I tcpdump on the network > interface inside the guest, I see the packet go out. If I tcpdump on > vif22.0 I see the packet, if I tcpdump on br0 I see the packet. If I > tcpdump on eth0 I don't see the packet. This means the packet isn't > going on the wire and it should. This all works fine with IPv4. Have you enabled IPv6 *completely* in the host kernel? Does the following return anything? % ifconfig eth0 | grep inet6 Is this output informative? % grep -E 'I(P|PV|NET)6' /boot/config-`uname -r` Kernel modules to consider: ip6tables (for module names like ip6t_*) iptunnel6 ipv6 nf_conntrack_ipv6 sit Packages to consider for convenience (not required to get IPv6 pkts on eth0, names from Debian): ipv6calc ndisc6 netcat6 oping radvd rdisc6 sipcalc traceroute ucspi-tcp-ipv6 wireshark HTH, --Tom From jpschewe at mtu.net Fri Feb 12 19:09:25 2010 From: jpschewe at mtu.net (Jon Schewe) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:09:25 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Problem with Linux bridge and IPv6 In-Reply-To: <4B75F79C.2080309@info9.net> References: <4B75EB18.1030208@mtu.net> <4B75F79C.2080309@info9.net> Message-ID: <4B75FBC5.3050508@mtu.net> On 02/12/2010 06:51 PM, Tom Marble wrote: > Jon Schewe wrote: > >> I've got a setup with Xen using bridging. The host is OpenSUSE Linux, >> the guest is NetBSD. I have a bridge named br0 that bridges eth0 (my >> physical interface) and vif22.0 (the interface for the NetBSD guest). My >> NetBSD guest sends out an IPv6 packet. If I tcpdump on the network >> interface inside the guest, I see the packet go out. If I tcpdump on >> vif22.0 I see the packet, if I tcpdump on br0 I see the packet. If I >> tcpdump on eth0 I don't see the packet. This means the packet isn't >> going on the wire and it should. This all works fine with IPv4. >> > Have you enabled IPv6 *completely* in the host kernel? > > Does the following return anything? > % ifconfig eth0 | grep inet6 > > Yes and the bridge interface as an inet6 address as well. > Is this output informative? > % grep -E 'I(P|PV|NET)6' /boot/config-`uname -r` > > CONFIG_IPV6=m CONFIG_IPV6_PRIVACY=y CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF=y CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTE_INFO=y # CONFIG_IPV6_OPTIMISTIC_DAD is not set CONFIG_INET6_AH=m CONFIG_INET6_ESP=m CONFIG_INET6_IPCOMP=m CONFIG_IPV6_MIP6=m CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_TUNNEL=m CONFIG_INET6_TUNNEL=m CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_MODE_TRANSPORT=m CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL=m CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_MODE_BEET=m CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_MODE_ROUTEOPTIMIZATION=m CONFIG_IPV6_SIT=m CONFIG_IPV6_NDISC_NODETYPE=y CONFIG_IPV6_TUNNEL=m CONFIG_IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES=y # CONFIG_IPV6_MROUTE is not set CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6=y CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_IPV6=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_QUEUE=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_IPTABLES=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_AH=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_EUI64=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_FRAG=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_OPTS=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_HL=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_IPV6HEADER=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_MH=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_RT=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_TARGET_HL=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_TARGET_LOG=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_FILTER=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_TARGET_REJECT=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_MANGLE=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_RAW=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_SECURITY=m CONFIG_BRIDGE_EBT_IP6=m CONFIG_SLIP_MODE_SLIP6=y > Kernel modules to consider: > ip6tables (for module names like ip6t_*) > iptunnel6 > ipv6 > nf_conntrack_ipv6 > sit > > mn-server:~ # lsmod | egrep '(ip6|sit)' ip6table_filter 4552 0 ip6_tables 26040 1 ip6table_filter x_tables 29936 7 ip6_tables,ipt_LOG,ipt_MASQUERADE,iptable_nat,xt_state,xt_physdev,ip_tables > Packages to consider for convenience > (not required to get IPv6 pkts on eth0, names from Debian): > ipv6calc > ndisc6 > netcat6 > oping > radvd > rdisc6 > sipcalc > traceroute > ucspi-tcp-ipv6 > wireshark > > HTH, > > --Tom > > -- Jon Schewe | http://mtu.net/~jpschewe If you see an attachment named signature.asc, this is my digital signature. See http://www.gnupg.org for more information. For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord. - Romans 8:38-39 From jpschewe at mtu.net Fri Feb 12 19:12:29 2010 From: jpschewe at mtu.net (Jon Schewe) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:12:29 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Problem with Linux bridge and IPv6 In-Reply-To: <4B75F79C.2080309@info9.net> References: <4B75EB18.1030208@mtu.net> <4B75F79C.2080309@info9.net> Message-ID: <4B75FC7D.3030100@mtu.net> On 02/12/2010 06:51 PM, Tom Marble wrote: > Jon Schewe wrote: > >> I've got a setup with Xen using bridging. The host is OpenSUSE Linux, >> the guest is NetBSD. I have a bridge named br0 that bridges eth0 (my >> physical interface) and vif22.0 (the interface for the NetBSD guest). My >> NetBSD guest sends out an IPv6 packet. If I tcpdump on the network >> interface inside the guest, I see the packet go out. If I tcpdump on >> vif22.0 I see the packet, if I tcpdump on br0 I see the packet. If I >> tcpdump on eth0 I don't see the packet. This means the packet isn't >> going on the wire and it should. This all works fine with IPv4. >> > Have you enabled IPv6 *completely* in the host kernel? > > Does the following return anything? > % ifconfig eth0 | grep inet6 > > Is this output informative? > % grep -E 'I(P|PV|NET)6' /boot/config-`uname -r` > > Kernel modules to consider: > ip6tables (for module names like ip6t_*) > iptunnel6 > ipv6 > nf_conntrack_ipv6 > sit > > Packages to consider for convenience > (not required to get IPv6 pkts on eth0, names from Debian): > ipv6calc > ndisc6 > netcat6 > oping > radvd > rdisc6 > sipcalc > traceroute > ucspi-tcp-ipv6 > wireshark > > Here's the firewall output as well: mn-server:/etc/xen # ip6tables -L Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination mn-server:/etc/xen # iptables -L Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED PHYSDEV match --physdev-out vif22.0 ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere PHYSDEV match --physdev-in vif22.0 ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED PHYSDEV match --physdev-out vif17.0 ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere PHYSDEV match --physdev-in vif17.0 ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED PHYSDEV match --physdev-out vif8.1 ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere PHYSDEV match --physdev-in vif8.1 ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED PHYSDEV match --physdev-out vif8.0 ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere PHYSDEV match --physdev-in vif8.0 ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED PHYSDEV match --physdev-out vif6.0 ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere PHYSDEV match --physdev-in vif6.0 ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED PHYSDEV match --physdev-out vif5.0 ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere PHYSDEV match --physdev-in vif5.0 ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED PHYSDEV match --physdev-out vif4.0 ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere PHYSDEV match --physdev-in vif4.0 ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED PHYSDEV match --physdev-out vif2.0 ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere PHYSDEV match --physdev-in vif2.0 ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere LOG all -- anywhere anywhere LOG level warning ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere LOG all -- anywhere anywhere LOG level warning Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination -- Jon Schewe | http://mtu.net/~jpschewe If you see an attachment named signature.asc, this is my digital signature. See http://www.gnupg.org for more information. For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord. - Romans 8:38-39 From zzabnr at gmail.com Fri Feb 12 21:19:57 2010 From: zzabnr at gmail.com (bnr bnr) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:19:57 -0800 Subject: [tclug-list] installing Ubuntu from thumb drive Message-ID: <8aa998961002121919j482b41d9gb20aaac083a39b5d@mail.gmail.com> > Do you know of good instructions on how to make the Ubuntu installation thumb > drive from a Windows box? http://www.pendrivelinux.com/create-a-ubuntu-9-10-live-usb-in-windows/ and if you want to try another distro they[pendrivelinux.com] cover at least a dozen. From sraun at fireopal.org Sun Feb 14 21:00:42 2010 From: sraun at fireopal.org (Scott Raun) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:00:42 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Any Exim experts out there? Message-ID: <20100215030042.GA25200@fireopal.org> I'm trying to set up some e-mail using the -bm and -t switches to Exim. I think they'll do what I want to do. Can anyone provide some pointers? I think I'm missing something obvious - specifically, exactly how a "locally-generated, non-SMTP message on the current input" is generate? I need to send a largish quantity of customized e-mails - I have a mailing database with information that is anywhere between six months and three years old. It has e-mail addresses & mailing addresses. I can make it generate either single files or one big file to feed into exim (although I'd actually prefer one big one) - but I can't figure out how to get exim to _take_ the data! I've tried the following: cat filename | exim -bm -t exim -bm -t < filename These both generate an e-mail, but it's not picking up my From or To lines. exim -bm -t filename This requires a Control-D and then generates an empty e-mail. -- Scott Raun sraun at fireopal.org From webmaster at mn-linux.org Mon Feb 15 08:37:06 2010 From: webmaster at mn-linux.org (TCLUG Classifieds) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:37:06 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] New TCLUG Classified Ad Message-ID: <201002151437.o1FEb6a30873@crusader.real-time.com> New TCLUG Classified Ad Category: Computer Type of Ad: For Free Subject: series 2 tivo this is a series 2 tivo, i forget how much storage it has (80G, iirc, but don't quote me). it works perfectly, we just don't watch TV so i've ceased the service. if you're curious about the interfaces and such, go here: http://bit.ly/cmvOys lots of people hack on these things. some folks want to try the service. Seller Email address: sulrich at gmail dot com http://www.mn-linux.org/cgi-bin/classifieds/index.cgi From webmaster at mn-linux.org Mon Feb 15 08:40:06 2010 From: webmaster at mn-linux.org (TCLUG Classifieds) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:40:06 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] New TCLUG Classified Ad Message-ID: <201002151440.o1FEe6C32377@crusader.real-time.com> New TCLUG Classified Ad Category: Computer Type of Ad: For Free Subject: series 2 tivo w/wireless adapter this is an early version of the series 2 tivo. it includes a tivo brand wireless adaptor. i believe this is a 40G tivo, don't quote me on that. it doesn't have an integrated ethernet interface as some of the later iterations of the series 2 tivo did. you'll have to pony up your own USB cable or USB wired ethernet interface. but otherwise all of the series 2 tivo elements are there. Seller Email address: sulrich at gmail dot com http://www.mn-linux.org/cgi-bin/classifieds/index.cgi From webmaster at mn-linux.org Mon Feb 15 08:42:25 2010 From: webmaster at mn-linux.org (TCLUG Classifieds) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:42:25 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] New TCLUG Classified Ad Message-ID: <201002151442.o1FEgP501124@crusader.real-time.com> New TCLUG Classified Ad Category: Computer Type of Ad: For Free Subject: upsampling DVD player i finally upgraded to blu-ray. this works perfectly. includes remote. for more information on this particular model, check here: http://bit.ly/c9DaUe Seller Email address: sulrich at gmail dot com http://www.mn-linux.org/cgi-bin/classifieds/index.cgi From daniel.armbrust.list at gmail.com Mon Feb 15 08:49:11 2010 From: daniel.armbrust.list at gmail.com (Dan Armbrust) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:49:11 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Warning about Okular and PDF files Message-ID: <82f04dc41002150649s2c30a932w6ddd6eb4f106dc47@mail.gmail.com> Hey folks, Just a friendly warning about Okular (KDEs PDF viewer) - If you have ever filled out a PDF form with okular (like something for your bank, or your taxes, etc) - Okular silently dumps all of the form data into a clear text file inside the .kde folder in your home directory. Even if you only printed (didn't save) the PDF. I don't think I'm overreacting to call this a really bad idea... but the developers of Okular seem to think otherwise. Dan From mbmiller+l at gmail.com Mon Feb 15 09:28:18 2010 From: mbmiller+l at gmail.com (Mike Miller) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:28:18 -0600 (CST) Subject: [tclug-list] Warning about Okular and PDF files In-Reply-To: <82f04dc41002150649s2c30a932w6ddd6eb4f106dc47@mail.gmail.com> References: <82f04dc41002150649s2c30a932w6ddd6eb4f106dc47@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Thanks, Dan. I guess you mean that this is a kind of security/privacy issue, right? What permissions does it give to that file? Does this mean that someone could, conceivably, copy your Okular text file, download the same PDF and then see how you filled it in? Mike On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Dan Armbrust wrote: > Hey folks, > > Just a friendly warning about Okular (KDEs PDF viewer) - If you have > ever filled out a PDF form with okular (like something for your bank, or > your taxes, etc) - Okular silently dumps all of the form data into a > clear text file inside the .kde folder in your home directory. Even if > you only printed (didn't save) the PDF. > > I don't think I'm overreacting to call this a really bad idea... but the > developers of Okular seem to think otherwise. > > Dan From florin at iucha.net Mon Feb 15 09:51:29 2010 From: florin at iucha.net (Florin Iucha) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:51:29 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Warning about Okular and PDF files In-Reply-To: References: <82f04dc41002150649s2c30a932w6ddd6eb4f106dc47@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100215155128.GH25460@iris.iucha.org> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 09:28:18AM -0600, Mike Miller wrote: > Thanks, Dan. I guess you mean that this is a kind of security/privacy > issue, right? What permissions does it give to that file? File permissions matter on computers under your physical control. A shared home directory will be backed up on unencrypted tapes who'll end up who knows where. > Does this mean > that someone could, conceivably, copy your Okular text file, download the > same PDF and then see how you filled it in? Even looking at the values, without the form, you could guess addresses, phone numbers, ssns and other juicy bits. Cheers, florin -- Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition. http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100215/adc83a52/attachment.pgp From daniel.armbrust.list at gmail.com Mon Feb 15 09:55:52 2010 From: daniel.armbrust.list at gmail.com (Dan Armbrust) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:55:52 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Warning about Okular and PDF files In-Reply-To: References: <82f04dc41002150649s2c30a932w6ddd6eb4f106dc47@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <82f04dc41002150755h61d8686difdc860a35c2c8c29@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Mike Miller wrote: > Thanks, Dan. I guess you mean that this is a kind of security/privacy > issue, right? What permissions does it give to that file? Does this mean > that someone could, conceivably, copy your Okular text file, download the > same PDF and then see how you filled it in? > > Mike > > Well, it's inside your user directory. So it has whatever protections that provides. Personally, I keep my Tax forms inside of a true-crypt volume. I started filling out a form in Okular, Saved it, reopened it - was pleasently surprised that it remembered the values I filled in. But then I opened it in Adobe Reader, and it did not have the values I filled in - so I knew something fishy was going on. Then I found the data floating from the PDF form in an xml file, outside of my truecrypt volume. If you have ever downloaded a form from your bank, filled it out and printed it (without ever clicking save) using okular - Okular just dumped everything you typed into a clear text file on your harddisk. And it never informs you of this, or gives you any choice about it. Certainly not expected behavior. Dan From nesius at gmail.com Mon Feb 15 10:14:49 2010 From: nesius at gmail.com (Robert Nesius) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:14:49 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Warning about Okular and PDF files In-Reply-To: <82f04dc41002150755h61d8686difdc860a35c2c8c29@mail.gmail.com> References: <82f04dc41002150649s2c30a932w6ddd6eb4f106dc47@mail.gmail.com> <82f04dc41002150755h61d8686difdc860a35c2c8c29@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Dan Armbrust < daniel.armbrust.list at gmail.com> wrote: > > If you have ever downloaded a form from your bank, filled it out and > printed it (without ever clicking save) using okular - Okular just > dumped everything you typed into a clear text file on your harddisk. > And it never informs you of this, or gives you any choice about it. > > Certainly not expected behavior. > Not expected and not acceptable. Beyond the backup-tape scenario mentioned, there are others that could cause problems. Part of securing your identity and information is knowing where the information is contained. If your box gets owned you might just reload it and think "No big deal - I had it backed up and I didn't have anything sensitive on my drive." Doh. -Rob -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100215/f6efc0e9/attachment.htm From mbmiller+l at gmail.com Mon Feb 15 11:06:22 2010 From: mbmiller+l at gmail.com (Mike Miller) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:06:22 -0600 (CST) Subject: [tclug-list] Warning about Okular and PDF files In-Reply-To: <82f04dc41002150755h61d8686difdc860a35c2c8c29@mail.gmail.com> References: <82f04dc41002150649s2c30a932w6ddd6eb4f106dc47@mail.gmail.com> <82f04dc41002150755h61d8686difdc860a35c2c8c29@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Dan Armbrust wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Mike Miller wrote: > >> Thanks, Dan. I guess you mean that this is a kind of security/privacy >> issue, right? What permissions does it give to that file? Does this >> mean that someone could, conceivably, copy your Okular text file, >> download the same PDF and then see how you filled it in? > > Well, it's inside your user directory. So it has whatever protections > that provides. Plus whatever protections the file permissions provide. If a directory is 755 but a file in it is 600, that's better protection than if the file is 644. If they made the file 644 in a directory that is 755, that would be especially reckless, so I was wondering about that. If they made the file 600, that would suggest that they see the problem, but they think the file permission is enough to deal with it. Mike From daniel.armbrust.list at gmail.com Mon Feb 15 11:44:29 2010 From: daniel.armbrust.list at gmail.com (Dan Armbrust) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:44:29 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Warning about Okular and PDF files In-Reply-To: References: <82f04dc41002150649s2c30a932w6ddd6eb4f106dc47@mail.gmail.com> <82f04dc41002150755h61d8686difdc860a35c2c8c29@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <82f04dc41002150944o2893ed85v94882e8b6fe416b@mail.gmail.com> > Plus whatever protections the file permissions provide. ?If a directory is > 755 but a file in it is 600, that's better protection than if the file is > 644. ?If they made the file 644 in a directory that is 755, that would be > especially reckless, so I was wondering about that. ?If they made the file > 600, that would suggest that they see the problem, but they think the file > permission is enough to deal with it. > > Mike > dana at strongbad:~ =>ls -al .kde/share/apps/okular/docdata/ total 4 drwx------ 2 dana dana 88 2010-02-15 11:43 . drwx------ 3 dana dana 104 2010-02-15 11:43 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 dana dana 363 2010-02-15 11:43 31460.sample.pdf.xml Sigh. But the directory permissions above the file are 700. The fact that the file even exists without the app informing me about it is what irks me. Dan From florin at iucha.net Mon Feb 15 13:12:49 2010 From: florin at iucha.net (Florin Iucha) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:12:49 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Warning about Okular and PDF files In-Reply-To: <82f04dc41002150944o2893ed85v94882e8b6fe416b@mail.gmail.com> References: <82f04dc41002150649s2c30a932w6ddd6eb4f106dc47@mail.gmail.com> <82f04dc41002150755h61d8686difdc860a35c2c8c29@mail.gmail.com> <82f04dc41002150944o2893ed85v94882e8b6fe416b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100215191249.GJ25460@iris.iucha.org> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:44:29AM -0600, Dan Armbrust wrote: > > Plus whatever protections the file permissions provide. ?If a directory is > > 755 but a file in it is 600, that's better protection than if the file is > > 644. ?If they made the file 644 in a directory that is 755, that would be > > especially reckless, so I was wondering about that. ?If they made the file > > 600, that would suggest that they see the problem, but they think the file > > permission is enough to deal with it. > > > > Mike > > > > dana at strongbad:~ =>ls -al .kde/share/apps/okular/docdata/ > total 4 > drwx------ 2 dana dana 88 2010-02-15 11:43 . > drwx------ 3 dana dana 104 2010-02-15 11:43 .. > -rw-r--r-- 1 dana dana 363 2010-02-15 11:43 31460.sample.pdf.xml > > > Sigh. But the directory permissions above the file are 700. > > The fact that the file even exists without the app informing me about > it is what irks me. They wanted to be "user-friendly" and not scare or annoy you with the warning dialog. And in all fairness, most users will just click-through it with reckless abandon. Oh well, florin -- Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition. http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100215/18ce728a/attachment.pgp From mbmiller+l at gmail.com Mon Feb 15 15:33:06 2010 From: mbmiller+l at gmail.com (Mike Miller) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:33:06 -0600 (CST) Subject: [tclug-list] Warning about Okular and PDF files In-Reply-To: <20100215191249.GJ25460@iris.iucha.org> References: <82f04dc41002150649s2c30a932w6ddd6eb4f106dc47@mail.gmail.com> <82f04dc41002150755h61d8686difdc860a35c2c8c29@mail.gmail.com> <82f04dc41002150944o2893ed85v94882e8b6fe416b@mail.gmail.com> <20100215191249.GJ25460@iris.iucha.org> Message-ID: On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Florin Iucha wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:44:29AM -0600, Dan Armbrust wrote: > >>> Plus whatever protections the file permissions provide. ?If a >>> directory is 755 but a file in it is 600, that's better protection >>> than if the file is 644. ?If they made the file 644 in a directory >>> that is 755, that would be especially reckless, so I was wondering >>> about that. ?If they made the file 600, that would suggest that they >>> see the problem, but they think the file permission is enough to deal >>> with it. >> >> >> dana at strongbad:~ =>ls -al .kde/share/apps/okular/docdata/ >> total 4 >> drwx------ 2 dana dana 88 2010-02-15 11:43 . >> drwx------ 3 dana dana 104 2010-02-15 11:43 .. >> -rw-r--r-- 1 dana dana 363 2010-02-15 11:43 31460.sample.pdf.xml >> >> >> Sigh. But the directory permissions above the file are 700. >> >> The fact that the file even exists without the app informing me about >> it is what irks me. > > They wanted to be "user-friendly" and not scare or annoy you with the > warning dialog. And in all fairness, most users will just click-through > it with reckless abandon. But they seem to save the file indefinitely. If the user downloads a PDF file, fills it in, prints it out and deletes it, the foo.sample.pdf.xml file remains, possibly forever. If I fill out a form, then I want my wife to fill out that same form using my account, I guess it would be tricky to figure out how to clear all of the fields. It's just a very weird situation, isn't it? I can see how it would make more customers happy than unhappy, but it's just bad practice. They could prompt the user "save form data?", or something like that when the file is being closed. Mike From daniel.armbrust.list at gmail.com Mon Feb 15 15:42:15 2010 From: daniel.armbrust.list at gmail.com (Dan Armbrust) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:42:15 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Warning about Okular and PDF files In-Reply-To: References: <82f04dc41002150649s2c30a932w6ddd6eb4f106dc47@mail.gmail.com> <82f04dc41002150755h61d8686difdc860a35c2c8c29@mail.gmail.com> <82f04dc41002150944o2893ed85v94882e8b6fe416b@mail.gmail.com> <20100215191249.GJ25460@iris.iucha.org> Message-ID: <82f04dc41002151342g483f855ap2dcb99821211a5af@mail.gmail.com> > > But they seem to save the file indefinitely. ?If the user downloads a PDF > file, fills it in, prints it out and deletes it, the foo.sample.pdf.xml file > remains, possibly forever. > > If I fill out a form, then I want my wife to fill out that same form using > my account, I guess it would be tricky to figure out how to clear all of the > fields. > > It's just a very weird situation, isn't it? ?I can see how it would make > more customers happy than unhappy, but it's just bad practice. ?They could > prompt the user "save form data?", or something like that when the file is > being closed. > > Mike Yea, there are all sorts of problems with the approach that they took, when you think about it for more than 20 seconds. They could make it vastly better simply by: 1) Asking if you want the data saved 2) Storing the file in the same folder where the PDF resides on disk, with a name that is the same as the file names, plus some specific extension. At least then, you would also have a clue that their "save" does not implement a proper PDF form save at all. Dan From florin at iucha.net Mon Feb 15 16:05:16 2010 From: florin at iucha.net (Florin Iucha) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:05:16 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Warning about Okular and PDF files In-Reply-To: References: <82f04dc41002150649s2c30a932w6ddd6eb4f106dc47@mail.gmail.com> <82f04dc41002150755h61d8686difdc860a35c2c8c29@mail.gmail.com> <82f04dc41002150944o2893ed85v94882e8b6fe416b@mail.gmail.com> <20100215191249.GJ25460@iris.iucha.org> Message-ID: <20100215220516.GL25460@iris.iucha.org> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 03:33:06PM -0600, Mike Miller wrote: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Florin Iucha wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:44:29AM -0600, Dan Armbrust wrote: >> >>> The fact that the file even exists without the app informing me about it >>> is what irks me. >> >> They wanted to be "user-friendly" and not scare or annoy you with the >> warning dialog. And in all fairness, most users will just click-through >> it with reckless abandon. > > > But they seem to save the file indefinitely. If the user downloads a PDF > file, fills it in, prints it out and deletes it, the foo.sample.pdf.xml > file remains, possibly forever. > > If I fill out a form, then I want my wife to fill out that same form using > my account, I guess it would be tricky to figure out how to clear all of > the fields. > > It's just a very weird situation, isn't it? I can see how it would make > more customers happy than unhappy, but it's just bad practice. They could > prompt the user "save form data?", or something like that when the file is > being closed. I wholeheartedly agree that it was a completely boneheaded decision. I understand the tension between security and usability, but I firmly believe that the Okular developers made a bad call. Just as some big wig at Adobe was explaining how useful enabling JavaScript in Acrobat Reader is, even though it is the backdoor for most of the PDF infections and most of the people don't need the functionality at all. Cheers, florin -- Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition. http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100215/6c279c61/attachment.pgp From jpschewe at mtu.net Tue Feb 16 13:44:42 2010 From: jpschewe at mtu.net (Jon Schewe) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:44:42 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Any git experts out there? Message-ID: <4B7AF5AA.7000007@mtu.net> I've got a particular git workflow that doesn't appear to be working like I had hoped it would. I have 2 working dirs. "connected" - most people have access to this one and data flows in and out of it "disconnected" - able to get data from "connected" here, but can't go the other way, except by patches. Attached is a shell script outlining what I'm trying to do. Note that the last step fails with a conflict. I would not have expected this given that the patch came from git and was applied by git, so I would have expected it to keep the history correct so that when data goes back to "disconnected" from "connected" git should notice that the change was one that already exists in the "disconnected" working directory. -- Jon Schewe | http://mtu.net/~jpschewe If you see an attachment named signature.asc, this is my digital signature. See http://www.gnupg.org for more information. For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord. - Romans 8:38-39 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: test.sh Type: application/x-sh Size: 998 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100216/acaebc01/attachment.sh From webmaster at mn-linux.org Wed Feb 17 17:55:41 2010 From: webmaster at mn-linux.org (TCLUG Classifieds) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:55:41 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] New TCLUG Classified Ad Message-ID: <201002172355.o1HNtfX07433@crusader.real-time.com> New TCLUG Classified Ad Category: Computer Type of Ad: For Sale Subject: Dell c400 starting my spring cleaning early by parting with my Dell Latitude c400, or as I like to call it the poor man's netbook. 1.2gHz processor, 512MB ram. No built-in wireless, but I'll include a NetGear PCMCIA adapter. I'm also throwing in two power adapters and two half-worthless batteries. Currently as CrunchBang linux installed. Screen and hinges are fully functional. The delete key is functional, but requires some extra effort. The hood has several stickers, including a HACKER sticker, an Ultimate Player's Assoc. (frisbee) sticker and a Glacier National Park (GNP) sticker. Asking price: $125, OBO. Available for pickup in downtown Minneapolis, or areas in and around Eagan. Seller Email address: gscottwalters at gmail dot com http://www.mn-linux.org/cgi-bin/classifieds/index.cgi From dniesen at gmail.com Wed Feb 17 19:13:34 2010 From: dniesen at gmail.com (Donovan) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:13:34 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Simple file/upload with user authentication on the web? Message-ID: <47f4d5e71002171713v32fd3052v3e2ddee6d88e516b@mail.gmail.com> Does anybody know of a LAMP-type software that will allow users to upload/download files into their own directories via HTTP? LAMP stack would be preferred but we also have IIS servers and I'm not opposed to installing something standalone if it does the job well. -- Donovan Niesen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100217/2ec8e63b/attachment.htm From dutchman_mn at charter.net Wed Feb 17 19:50:16 2010 From: dutchman_mn at charter.net (Perry Hoekstra) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:50:16 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Simple file/upload with user authentication on the web? In-Reply-To: <47f4d5e71002171713v32fd3052v3e2ddee6d88e516b@mail.gmail.com> References: <47f4d5e71002171713v32fd3052v3e2ddee6d88e516b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B7C9CD8.5060906@charter.net> You mean a WEBDAV server running either Python or Perl (the 'P' in LAMP).? Perry Hoekstra Donovan wrote: > Does anybody know of a LAMP-type software that will allow users to > upload/download files into their own directories via HTTP? LAMP stack > would be preferred but we also have IIS servers and I'm not opposed to > installing something standalone if it does the job well. > > -- > Donovan Niesen > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > From dniesen at gmail.com Wed Feb 17 21:00:45 2010 From: dniesen at gmail.com (Donovan) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:00:45 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Simple file/upload with user authentication on the web? In-Reply-To: <4B7C9CD8.5060906@charter.net> References: <47f4d5e71002171713v32fd3052v3e2ddee6d88e516b@mail.gmail.com> <4B7C9CD8.5060906@charter.net> Message-ID: <47f4d5e71002171900q66489900xea4835b48ca65641@mail.gmail.com> While that could work, I'm trying to keep it very simple. I'm not too familiar with WEBDAV but don't you need to use something outside of the browser to transfer files? What I envision is a browser with a simple login page, upon login the user is shown files associated to their username and a way to upload additional files. Wouldn't be too hard to whip up in a "P" of my choice (I'm a PHP hack myself) but I was hoping to find something prebuilt that did just this. On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Perry Hoekstra wrote: > You mean a WEBDAV server running either Python or Perl (the 'P' in LAMP).? > > Perry Hoekstra > > Donovan wrote: > >> Does anybody know of a LAMP-type software that will allow users to >> upload/download files into their own directories via HTTP? LAMP stack would >> be preferred but we also have IIS servers and I'm not opposed to installing >> something standalone if it does the job well. >> -- >> Donovan Niesen >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >> tclug-list at mn-linux.org >> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >> >> > > -- Donovan Niesen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100217/581683e6/attachment.htm From dutchman_mn at charter.net Wed Feb 17 21:15:07 2010 From: dutchman_mn at charter.net (Perry Hoekstra) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:15:07 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Simple file/upload with user authentication on the web? In-Reply-To: <47f4d5e71002171900q66489900xea4835b48ca65641@mail.gmail.com> References: <47f4d5e71002171713v32fd3052v3e2ddee6d88e516b@mail.gmail.com> <4B7C9CD8.5060906@charter.net> <47f4d5e71002171900q66489900xea4835b48ca65641@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B7CB0BB.6070402@charter.net> No, but the directory where the files would go would have to be mounted as WEBDAV directory. I am hoping a sysadmin can chime in here because while I have included WEBDAV as part of an application solution for a client, I did not do the nuts/bolts configuration of the environment that set it up. Perry Hoekstra Donovan wrote: > While that could work, I'm trying to keep it very simple. I'm not too > familiar with WEBDAV but don't you need to use something outside of > the browser to transfer files? > > What I envision is a browser with a simple login page, upon login the > user is shown files associated to their username and a way to upload > additional files. Wouldn't be too hard to whip up in a "P" of my > choice (I'm a PHP hack myself) but I was hoping to find something > prebuilt that did just this. > > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Perry Hoekstra > > wrote: > > You mean a WEBDAV server running either Python or Perl (the 'P' in > LAMP).? > > Perry Hoekstra > > Donovan wrote: > > Does anybody know of a LAMP-type software that will allow > users to upload/download files into their own directories via > HTTP? LAMP stack would be preferred but we also have IIS > servers and I'm not opposed to installing something standalone > if it does the job well. > -- > Donovan Niesen > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > > > > > > -- > Donovan Niesen From nesius at gmail.com Wed Feb 17 22:12:41 2010 From: nesius at gmail.com (Robert Nesius) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:12:41 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Simple file/upload with user authentication on the web? In-Reply-To: <47f4d5e71002171900q66489900xea4835b48ca65641@mail.gmail.com> References: <47f4d5e71002171713v32fd3052v3e2ddee6d88e516b@mail.gmail.com> <4B7C9CD8.5060906@charter.net> <47f4d5e71002171900q66489900xea4835b48ca65641@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Sounds like sharepoint, or a poor man's wiki, could be what you want. Or skip the web server a go straight to ssh and sftp? -Rob On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Donovan wrote: > While that could work, I'm trying to keep it very simple. I'm not too > familiar with WEBDAV but don't you need to use something outside of the > browser to transfer files? > > What I envision is a browser with a simple login page, upon login the user > is shown files associated to their username and a way to upload additional > files. Wouldn't be too hard to whip up in a "P" of my choice (I'm a PHP > hack myself) but I was hoping to find something prebuilt that did just this. > > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Perry Hoekstra wrote: > >> You mean a WEBDAV server running either Python or Perl (the 'P' in LAMP).? >> >> Perry Hoekstra >> >> Donovan wrote: >> >>> Does anybody know of a LAMP-type software that will allow users to >>> upload/download files into their own directories via HTTP? LAMP stack would >>> be preferred but we also have IIS servers and I'm not opposed to installing >>> something standalone if it does the job well. >>> -- >>> Donovan Niesen >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >>> tclug-list at mn-linux.org >>> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- > Donovan Niesen > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100217/9ccdf882/attachment.htm From kelly.black at penguinpackets.com Wed Feb 17 22:23:13 2010 From: kelly.black at penguinpackets.com (kelly) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:23:13 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Simple file/upload with user authentication on the web? References: <47f4d5e71002171713v32fd3052v3e2ddee6d88e516b@mail.gmail.com> <4B7C9CD8.5060906@charter.net> <47f4d5e71002171900q66489900xea4835b48ca65641@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <0000095569@mail.penguinpackets.com> Would something like this work? http://www.ajaxplorer.info/wordpress/about/ Kelly -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100217/d955d044/attachment.htm -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: Url: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100217/d955d044/attachment.txt From nesius at gmail.com Wed Feb 17 22:33:14 2010 From: nesius at gmail.com (Robert Nesius) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:33:14 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Simple file/upload with user authentication on the web? In-Reply-To: <0000095569@mail.penguinpackets.com> References: <47f4d5e71002171713v32fd3052v3e2ddee6d88e516b@mail.gmail.com> <4B7C9CD8.5060906@charter.net> <47f4d5e71002171900q66489900xea4835b48ca65641@mail.gmail.com> <0000095569@mail.penguinpackets.com> Message-ID: I was just thinking along these lines myself, Kelly. It occurred to me that Donovan was describing what is often referred to as a Document Management System. There are lots of them out there.... I did a search on "Open Source Document Management System" and came up with a bunch of links, one of which looks representative of what a lot of solutions (free or otherwise) may have. http://www.openkm.com/ -Rob On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:23 PM, kelly wrote: > Would something like this work? > > http://www.ajaxplorer.info/wordpress/about/ > > Kelly > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100217/0e104ff5/attachment-0001.htm From dniesen at gmail.com Wed Feb 17 22:33:04 2010 From: dniesen at gmail.com (Donovan) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:33:04 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Simple file/upload with user authentication on the web? In-Reply-To: <0000095569@mail.penguinpackets.com> References: <47f4d5e71002171713v32fd3052v3e2ddee6d88e516b@mail.gmail.com> <4B7C9CD8.5060906@charter.net> <47f4d5e71002171900q66489900xea4835b48ca65641@mail.gmail.com> <0000095569@mail.penguinpackets.com> Message-ID: <47f4d5e71002172033q540aad59r6657ab2048d76e80@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:23 PM, kelly wrote: > Would something like this work? > > http://www.ajaxplorer.info/wordpress/about/ > > Kelly > This looks like it will fit the bill perfectly! Thanks, Kelly! -- Donovan Niesen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100217/d68f9dcc/attachment.htm From jus at krytosvirus.com Thu Feb 18 10:08:00 2010 From: jus at krytosvirus.com (Justin Krejci) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:08:00 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Simple file/upload with user authentication on the web? In-Reply-To: <47f4d5e71002171713v32fd3052v3e2ddee6d88e516b@mail.gmail.com> References: <47f4d5e71002171713v32fd3052v3e2ddee6d88e516b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=php+file+manager Sorry couldn't resist it. There are some really nice looking ones though I have not actually had a need myself for per user custom config (to lock users into their home directory) I have used a few for general access. _____ From: tclug-list-bounces at mn-linux.org [mailto:tclug-list-bounces at mn-linux.org] On Behalf Of Donovan Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 7:14 PM To: TCLUG List Subject: [tclug-list] Simple file/upload with user authentication on the web? Does anybody know of a LAMP-type software that will allow users to upload/download files into their own directories via HTTP? LAMP stack would be preferred but we also have IIS servers and I'm not opposed to installing something standalone if it does the job well. -- Donovan Niesen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100218/b37cda75/attachment.htm From dniesen at gmail.com Thu Feb 18 10:24:38 2010 From: dniesen at gmail.com (Donovan) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:24:38 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Simple file/upload with user authentication on the web? In-Reply-To: <1266509281970-032-2344195.jus.krytosvirus.com@sysadmin3> References: <47f4d5e71002171713v32fd3052v3e2ddee6d88e516b@mail.gmail.com> <1266509281970-032-2344195.jus.krytosvirus.com@sysadmin3> Message-ID: <47f4d5e71002180824k648f8841uc2f6d6d939dcb646@mail.gmail.com> Wow, add that site to my list of favorites. Not the file manager but the lmgtfy.com link. I was struggling with conjuring the right search term instead typing things like "web upload etc", must have needed some more sleep. Thanks! On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Justin Krejci wrote: > http://lmgtfy.com/?q=php+file+manager > > > > Sorry couldn?t resist it. > > > > There are some really nice looking ones though I have not actually had a > need myself for per user custom config (to lock users into their home > directory) I have used a few for general access. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* tclug-list-bounces at mn-linux.org [mailto: > tclug-list-bounces at mn-linux.org] *On Behalf Of *Donovan > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 17, 2010 7:14 PM > *To:* TCLUG List > *Subject:* [tclug-list] Simple file/upload with user authentication on the > web? > > > > Does anybody know of a LAMP-type software that will allow users to > upload/download files into their own directories via HTTP? LAMP stack would > be preferred but we also have IIS servers and I'm not opposed to installing > something standalone if it does the job well. > > > -- > Donovan Niesen > -- Donovan Niesen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100218/6296ab8f/attachment.htm From goeko at Goecke-Dolan.com Thu Feb 18 10:38:25 2010 From: goeko at Goecke-Dolan.com (Brian Dolan-Goecke) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:38:25 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Simple file/upload with user authentication on the web? In-Reply-To: References: <47f4d5e71002171713v32fd3052v3e2ddee6d88e516b@mail.gmail.com> <4B7C9CD8.5060906@charter.net> <47f4d5e71002171900q66489900xea4835b48ca65641@mail.gmail.com> <0000095569@mail.penguinpackets.com> Message-ID: <4B7D6D01.1050808@Goecke-Dolan.com> I have used Owl UltraLite http://owl.anytimecomm.com/ (The link brings you to the page for OWL, which a heavier Document Management system, under the downloads you can get Owl UltraLite. ) There is a public demo here, http://owl.anytimecomm.com/demo-owl/demo-owl-ul They also have a webdav interface....humm.... ( I don't know much about webdav). Not exactly sure how that will work on a per-user basis. But I would think you could figure something out. ==>brian. Robert Nesius wrote: > I was just thinking along these lines myself, Kelly. It occurred to me > that Donovan was describing what is often referred to as a Document > Management System. There are lots of them out there.... I did a search > on "Open Source Document Management System" and came up with a bunch of > links, one of which looks representative of what a lot of solutions > (free or otherwise) may have. > > http://www.openkm.com/ > > -Rob > > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:23 PM, kelly > wrote: > > Would something like this work? > > http://www.ajaxplorer.info/wordpress/about/ > > Kelly > > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list From webmaster at mn-linux.org Thu Feb 18 13:13:27 2010 From: webmaster at mn-linux.org (TCLUG Classifieds) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:13:27 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] New TCLUG Classified Ad Message-ID: <201002181913.o1IJDRZ30243@crusader.real-time.com> New TCLUG Classified Ad Category: Computer Type of Ad: Want to Buy Subject: Cheap Old PC (Smaller the better) I'm looking for a working and reliable old PC. Nothing fancy, can be a Pentium 2 with a 2GB harddrive. I'm building a pfsense box and looking for something on the cheap. Seller Email address: aaronmill1 at gmail dot com http://www.mn-linux.org/cgi-bin/classifieds/index.cgi From goeko at Goecke-Dolan.com Fri Feb 19 02:14:50 2010 From: goeko at Goecke-Dolan.com (Brian Dolan-Goecke) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:14:50 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Authoring DVDs with Linux @PenguinsUnbound Linux Meeting Feb. 27th Message-ID: <4B7E487A.1040102@Goecke-Dolan.com> This months PenguinsUnbound.com meeting will be Saturday February 27th at TIES, 1667 Snelling Ave. N., St. Paul, MN 55108 from 10:00am to 12:00pm (See the web site http://www.penguinsunbound.com for directions and more info.) This month at the PenguinsUnbound Meeting I will demonstrate how to author DVDs with Linux. So you can take your home movies and play then on any DVD player! Hope you are going to be able to make it. ==>brian. From dniesen at gmail.com Sat Feb 20 10:24:13 2010 From: dniesen at gmail.com (Donovan) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:24:13 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Free DNS hosting now that EveryDNS == DynDNS? Message-ID: <47f4d5e71002200824p582a949etff6faf0e4d6676fa@mail.gmail.com> Anybody have a recommendation for a free, self-managed DNS service (other than hosting my own...)? I always had freedns.afraid.org in the back of my mind but after looking more closely, it seems that others can create subdomains under your domains unless you sign up for the premium service ($60/year). If there isn't a good alternative, I'll just bite the bullet and get a good paid DNS service so recommendations in that arena would also be welcome. -- Donovan Niesen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100220/b285992b/attachment.htm From tclug at jfoo.org Sat Feb 20 22:57:15 2010 From: tclug at jfoo.org (John Gateley) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:57:15 -0800 Subject: [tclug-list] Free DNS hosting now that EveryDNS == DynDNS? In-Reply-To: <47f4d5e71002200824p582a949etff6faf0e4d6676fa@mail.gmail.com> References: <47f4d5e71002200824p582a949etff6faf0e4d6676fa@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B80BD2B.1080207@jfoo.org> Donovan wrote: > Anybody have a recommendation for a free, self-managed DNS service > (other than hosting my own...)? Check your domain registrar - they may host it. Godaddy does, it is fairly usable. Free. I ran my own for a few years to a server in my house via DSL, that's not optimal. j From troythetechguy at gmail.com Sun Feb 21 11:22:23 2010 From: troythetechguy at gmail.com (Troy) Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:22:23 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Free DNS hosting now that EveryDNS == DynDNS? In-Reply-To: <47f4d5e71002200824p582a949etff6faf0e4d6676fa@mail.gmail.com> References: <47f4d5e71002200824p582a949etff6faf0e4d6676fa@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <34de7f3d1002210922y5e560011tadc245b30f32aea6@mail.gmail.com> Have you tried DynDNS? http://www.dyndns.com/ I use DynDNS and it works great for my needs. Troy On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Donovan wrote: > Anybody have a recommendation for a free, self-managed DNS service (other > than hosting my own...)? > > I always had freedns.afraid.org in the back of my mind but after looking > more closely, it seems that others can create subdomains under your domains > unless you sign up for the premium service ($60/year). > > If there isn't a good alternative, I'll just bite the bullet and get a good > paid DNS service so recommendations in that arena would also be welcome. > > -- > Donovan Niesen > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100221/dc7f0b67/attachment.htm From andyschmid at gmail.com Sun Feb 21 11:49:03 2010 From: andyschmid at gmail.com (Andy Schmid) Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:49:03 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Free DNS hosting now that EveryDNS == DynDNS? In-Reply-To: <34de7f3d1002210922y5e560011tadc245b30f32aea6@mail.gmail.com> References: <47f4d5e71002200824p582a949etff6faf0e4d6676fa@mail.gmail.com> <34de7f3d1002210922y5e560011tadc245b30f32aea6@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <7b7c42a31002210949j23b803d6q17924805e3fbaaa4@mail.gmail.com> I use XNAME.ORG for primary and secondary DNS servers on my domains. It does everything I need, and totally free. On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Troy wrote: > Have you tried DynDNS? http://www.dyndns.com/ I use DynDNS and it works > great for my needs. > > Troy > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Donovan wrote: > >> Anybody have a recommendation for a free, self-managed DNS service (other >> than hosting my own...)? >> >> I always had freedns.afraid.org in the back of my mind but after looking >> more closely, it seems that others can create subdomains under your domains >> unless you sign up for the premium service ($60/year). >> >> If there isn't a good alternative, I'll just bite the bullet and get a >> good paid DNS service so recommendations in that arena would also be >> welcome. >> >> -- >> Donovan Niesen >> >> _______________________________________________ >> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >> tclug-list at mn-linux.org >> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100221/b430af60/attachment.htm From dniesen at gmail.com Sun Feb 21 14:41:42 2010 From: dniesen at gmail.com (Donovan) Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:41:42 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Free DNS hosting now that EveryDNS == DynDNS? In-Reply-To: <7b7c42a31002210949j23b803d6q17924805e3fbaaa4@mail.gmail.com> References: <47f4d5e71002200824p582a949etff6faf0e4d6676fa@mail.gmail.com> <34de7f3d1002210922y5e560011tadc245b30f32aea6@mail.gmail.com> <7b7c42a31002210949j23b803d6q17924805e3fbaaa4@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <47f4d5e71002211241n8b06e59s877bea8ebafc6599@mail.gmail.com> XName looks like it will fit the bill nicely. Thanks for the tip! On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Andy Schmid wrote: > I use XNAME.ORG for primary and secondary DNS servers on my domains. It > does everything I need, and totally free. > > > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Troy wrote: > >> Have you tried DynDNS? http://www.dyndns.com/ I use DynDNS and it works >> great for my needs. >> >> Troy >> >> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Donovan wrote: >> >>> Anybody have a recommendation for a free, self-managed DNS service (other >>> than hosting my own...)? >>> >>> I always had freedns.afraid.org in the back of my mind but after looking >>> more closely, it seems that others can create subdomains under your domains >>> unless you sign up for the premium service ($60/year). >>> >>> If there isn't a good alternative, I'll just bite the bullet and get a >>> good paid DNS service so recommendations in that arena would also be >>> welcome. >>> >>> -- >>> Donovan Niesen >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >>> tclug-list at mn-linux.org >>> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >> tclug-list at mn-linux.org >> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >> >> > -- Donovan Niesen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100221/7f14757e/attachment.htm From trieff at greencaremankato.com Mon Feb 22 10:00:25 2010 From: trieff at greencaremankato.com (Thomas Rieff) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:00:25 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] /etc/fstab Message-ID: TCLUG, I am trying to configure Samba. Went to reboot and now it hangs at the fstab. I opened fstab and uncommented the last line. That did not help and I cannot get to a command prompt. Any ideas??? Tom Thomas Rieff GreenCare 1717 3rd Avenue Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 344-8314 Office (507) 344-8316 Fax (507) 381-0660 Cell -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100222/b6ba332a/attachment.htm From webmaster at mn-linux.org Mon Feb 22 10:02:41 2010 From: webmaster at mn-linux.org (TCLUG Classifieds) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:02:41 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] New TCLUG Classified Ad Message-ID: <201002221602.o1MG2fQ03287@crusader.real-time.com> New TCLUG Classified Ad Category: Computer Type of Ad: For Sale Subject: 1U Server Supermicro SuperServer 5013G-M Celeron 2.0 Ghz 256MB DDR2 40GB SATA HD Motherboard Supermicro P4SGE Server is one of the short 14" 1U Models Supermicro sells. Manufacturer Link: http://tinyurl.com/ycbxnbr $80.00 - Cash only Note: Decommissioned server from our datacenter. Seller Email address: tclugsales at iexposure dot com http://www.mn-linux.org/cgi-bin/classifieds/index.cgi From webmaster at mn-linux.org Mon Feb 22 10:09:08 2010 From: webmaster at mn-linux.org (TCLUG Classifieds) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:09:08 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] New TCLUG Classified Ad Message-ID: <201002221609.o1MG98404220@crusader.real-time.com> New TCLUG Classified Ad Category: Computer Type of Ad: For Sale Subject: 1U Server - Pentium 4 Supermicro SuperServer 5013C-M Pentium 4 2.8 Ghz 1024MB DDR2 36GB SATA HD (WD Raptor) Motherboard Supermicro P4SGE Server is one of the short 14" 1U Models Supermicro sells. Manufacturer Link: http://tinyurl.com/ycbxnbr $160.00 - Cash only Note: Decommissioned server from our datacenter. Seller Email address: tclugsales at iexposure dot com http://www.mn-linux.org/cgi-bin/classifieds/index.cgi From mailinglists at soul-dev.com Mon Feb 22 10:14:54 2010 From: mailinglists at soul-dev.com (Mr. MailingLists) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:14:54 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] /etc/fstab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4B82AD7E.9000602@soul-dev.com> On 2/22/2010 10:00 AM, Thomas Rieff wrote: > *TCLUG,* > > *I am trying to configure Samba.* > > *Went to reboot and now it hangs at the fstab.* > > *I opened fstab and uncommented the last line.* > > *That did not help and I cannot get to a command prompt.* > > *Any ideas???* > > *Tom* What are the contents of fstab? Did you make any modifications to it (such as adding mount points) after installing samba? You can try to interrupt the fs mount by hitting ctrl-c at the hang. I have this problem (not really a problem) on my freebsd laptop (on WiFi) since the interface does not come up until after attempting to mount fstab NFS mounts, which hangs until I interrupt the mount process. What is your syslog/kernel messages telling you? -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments From dan at dburkland.com Mon Feb 22 13:20:15 2010 From: dan at dburkland.com (Dan Burkland) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:20:15 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] /etc/fstab Message-ID: <75C99E4E-B16E-4998-B964-57AFDDF37E09@dburkland.com> One option would be to use autofs to mount the share rather than defining it in /etc/fstab. Regards, Dan Sent from my iPhone From kc0iog at gmail.com Mon Feb 22 21:54:23 2010 From: kc0iog at gmail.com (Brian Wall) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:54:23 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] /etc/fstab In-Reply-To: <75C99E4E-B16E-4998-B964-57AFDDF37E09@dburkland.com> References: <75C99E4E-B16E-4998-B964-57AFDDF37E09@dburkland.com> Message-ID: <2c6699da1002221954j4691d6mb0c723072afb2374@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Dan Burkland wrote: > One option would be to use autofs to mount the share rather than > defining it in /etc/fstab. Are you sure it's hanging at the fstab and not whatever process is next? Don't recall if sys5init uses a 'mountall' type command, could be that smbd is trying to start and it LOOKS like /etc/fstab is hanging. Otherwise, post the /etc/fstab and we'll taker a look. Brian From andyzib at gmail.com Tue Feb 23 09:30:09 2010 From: andyzib at gmail.com (Andrew S. Zbikowski) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:30:09 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] /etc/fstab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thomas, Your message is a bit unclear. You installed/configured samba, and now when you reboot your system hangs at mounting file systems in fstab? Unless you modified fstab in some way these two are unrelated. What are you trying to accomplish with samba? Why did you edit fstab? What exactly is it you're trying to do? Automatically mount SMB share on boot? If this is the case, did you test mounting the file system before rebooting? If not, do that next time and resolve the issue before you have an unbootable system. Once you do have things resolved, keep in mind your system may hang if the remote server is unavailable. Using autofs may work better, or your can throw a noauto flag into your fstab for the SMB file system so that Linux doesn't try to mount it automatically. In the mean time, have you tried bringing up your system in single user mode? Does that work or does the system still hang? What distribution are you using? -- Andrew S. Zbikowski | http://andy.zibnet.us IT Outhouse Blog Thing | http://www.itouthouse.com From webmaster at mn-linux.org Tue Feb 23 09:35:47 2010 From: webmaster at mn-linux.org (TCLUG Classifieds) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:35:47 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] New TCLUG Classified Ad Message-ID: <201002231535.o1NFZlL02272@crusader.real-time.com> New TCLUG Classified Ad Category: Computer Type of Ad: For Sale Subject: 1U - 4 Drive hot-swap with HW RAID Controller For Sale: Supermicro SuperServer 5014C-MT Pentium 4 3.0 Ghz 2x1024MB DDR2 400 ECC 4x80GB SATA HD (Seagate) Adaptec 2420SA RAID Controller 256MB RAM on-board (Yes this is a real RAID controller) PCI-X Motherboard Supermicro P8SCT Server is a 4 drive hot swap full length model with the mounting rails included. Manufacturer Link: http://tinyurl.com/7s9tt $560.00 OBO - Cash only Note: Decommissioned server from our datacenter. Seller Email address: tclugsales at iexposure dot com http://www.mn-linux.org/cgi-bin/classifieds/index.cgi From daniel.armbrust.list at gmail.com Tue Feb 23 09:36:56 2010 From: daniel.armbrust.list at gmail.com (Dan Armbrust) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:36:56 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Anyone using Intel binary linux video card drivers? Message-ID: <82f04dc41002230736y57906574hdb397d2f258207e6@mail.gmail.com> Anyone used the Intel Linux Binary Video card drivers recently? Do they work well? I'm looking to build a MythTV box, and thinking of getting a Motherboard with an integrated Intel GMA X4500HD video system... but it would be nice to know ahead of time if the Intel driver works worth anything in Linux... or should I stick with NVidia (which I know to work great)? And no, don't suggest ATI. I've been down that road... never going back :) Thanks, Dan From john.meier at gmail.com Tue Feb 23 09:51:04 2010 From: john.meier at gmail.com (John Meier) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:51:04 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Anyone using Intel binary linux video card drivers? In-Reply-To: <82f04dc41002230736y57906574hdb397d2f258207e6@mail.gmail.com> References: <82f04dc41002230736y57906574hdb397d2f258207e6@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <65293fcc1002230751jf40c376x4e45bfc97cfcd1c2@mail.gmail.com> > I'm looking to build a MythTV box, and thinking of getting a > Motherboard with an integrated Intel GMA X4500HD video system... but > it would be nice to know ahead of time if the Intel driver works worth > anything in Linux... or should I stick with NVidia (which I know to > work great)? > > Stick with NVidia. One less thing you'll have to muck around with. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100223/63b5703d/attachment.htm From mailinglists at soul-dev.com Tue Feb 23 10:04:30 2010 From: mailinglists at soul-dev.com (Mr. MailingLists) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:04:30 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Anyone using Intel binary linux video card drivers? In-Reply-To: <82f04dc41002230736y57906574hdb397d2f258207e6@mail.gmail.com> References: <82f04dc41002230736y57906574hdb397d2f258207e6@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B83FC8E.4000701@soul-dev.com> On 2/23/2010 9:36 AM, Dan Armbrust wrote: > Anyone used the Intel Linux Binary Video card drivers recently? > > Do they work well? > > I'm looking to build a MythTV box, and thinking of getting a > Motherboard with an integrated Intel GMA X4500HD video system... but > it would be nice to know ahead of time if the Intel driver works worth > anything in Linux... or should I stick with NVidia (which I know to > work great)? > > And no, don't suggest ATI. I've been down that road... never going back :) > > Thanks, > > Dan > I have been using the Intel GMA video chipsets for quite a while, and have had no problems whatsoever with video playback of many different qualities and sizes, ranging from your standard 800MB avi, to high quality 1080P 12-15MB H.264 Codec. The only problem chipset I have seen is the GMA 500 (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_GMA#GMA_500_on_Linux). You also are considering a much more beefy chipset that I have (I have the x3100), and they share the same driver (xorg-video-intel) which I believe has been open sourced. Most of the devices I play around with have a wide range of GMA chipsets, of which, of which all had accelerated 2D and 3D (With the exception of the 500). ~Mr. M -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments From mailinglists at soul-dev.com Tue Feb 23 10:14:40 2010 From: mailinglists at soul-dev.com (Mr. MailingLists) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:14:40 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Anyone using Intel binary linux video card drivers? In-Reply-To: <4B83FC8E.4000701@soul-dev.com> References: <82f04dc41002230736y57906574hdb397d2f258207e6@mail.gmail.com> <4B83FC8E.4000701@soul-dev.com> Message-ID: <4B83FEF0.4060202@soul-dev.com> On 2/23/2010 10:04 AM, Mr. MailingLists wrote: > On 2/23/2010 9:36 AM, Dan Armbrust wrote: >> Anyone used the Intel Linux Binary Video card drivers recently? >> >> Do they work well? >> >> I'm looking to build a MythTV box, and thinking of getting a >> Motherboard with an integrated Intel GMA X4500HD video system... but >> it would be nice to know ahead of time if the Intel driver works worth >> anything in Linux... or should I stick with NVidia (which I know to >> work great)? >> >> And no, don't suggest ATI. I've been down that road... never going back :) >> >> Thanks, >> >> Dan >> > I have been using the Intel GMA video chipsets for quite a while, and > have had no problems whatsoever with video playback of many different > qualities and sizes, ranging from your standard 800MB avi, to high > quality 1080P 12-15MB H.264 Codec. The only problem chipset I have seen > Sorry, I meant 12-15GB, not 12-15MB. There I go again ;-( -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments From trieff at greencaremankato.com Tue Feb 23 12:23:23 2010 From: trieff at greencaremankato.com (Thomas Rieff) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:23:23 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] /etc/fstab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: TCLUG, Thanks for the responses so far. I have not had time to spend on it. Maybe this evening. I will respond when I can uncomment what I did in fstab. Tom Thomas Rieff GreenCare 1717 3rd Avenue Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 344-8314 Office (507) 344-8316 Fax (507) 381-0660 Cell From webmaster at mn-linux.org Tue Feb 23 12:24:42 2010 From: webmaster at mn-linux.org (TCLUG Classifieds) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:24:42 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] New TCLUG Classified Ad Message-ID: <201002231824.o1NIOgg07950@crusader.real-time.com> New TCLUG Classified Ad Category: Computer Type of Ad: For Free Subject: 19in monitor and 2 x 17in monitors F R E E 19" old school monitor. Brand: GEM Still works great. Also, I have 2 x 17" old school monitors. Seller Email address: mkebob1134 at netscape dot net http://www.mn-linux.org/cgi-bin/classifieds/index.cgi From trieff at greencaremankato.com Wed Feb 24 07:49:43 2010 From: trieff at greencaremankato.com (Thomas Rieff) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:49:43 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] /etc/fstab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: TCLUG, I had a chance to play with a live cd last night to see if I could get to the fstab file, but it would not see my drives. Here is what I got. Ubuntu 9.10-64 server edition on new machine I set up Ubuntu software raid with md0 boot, md1 as root, and md2 as swap. I was in the process of configuring samba and rebooted. It was hanging at a spot, which looked like the last statement in fstab. I could control d and it would give me a command prompt. I commented the last line in fstab and rebooted. Now it hangs and I can not get back to a prompt to undue this part. Tried the live cd to find the md1 drive set, but no luck. Any thoughts??? Tom Thomas Rieff GreenCare 1717 3rd Avenue Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 344-8314 Office (507) 344-8316 Fax (507) 381-0660 Cell From justin.kremer at gmail.com Wed Feb 24 08:38:27 2010 From: justin.kremer at gmail.com (Justin Kremer) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:38:27 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] /etc/fstab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <27e6356a1002240638g74a5df65rdfc34deae7452291@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Thomas Rieff wrote: > I commented the last line in fstab and rebooted. > Now it hangs and I can not get back to a prompt to undue this part. > Tried the live cd to find the md1 drive set, but no luck. > Any thoughts??? Tom, As someone else mentioned, seeing your fstab may help us to help you. When you say you tried the Ubuntu live CD, I'm guessing that's the desktop one? I don't remember the server one being a live CD. I'm not positive, but I don't think the standard desktop live CD comes with the tools required for manipulating software RAIDs. You may need to connect the system to the Internet after booting the live CD and install the necessary packages. (mdadm and ???) I would suspect that possibly there was nothing wrong with the /etc/fstab file, but something else was wrong, and arbitrarily commenting out the last line of the fstab caused your system not to mount something important on boot...like your / partition? The other helpful piece of information would be to know what precisely you were doing to set up samba on this system. You haven't described that very well. Knowing specific steps you took, rather than a very vague "trying to configure samba" goes a long way in figuring out what might have gone wrong. - Justin From justin.kremer at gmail.com Wed Feb 24 09:33:31 2010 From: justin.kremer at gmail.com (Justin Kremer) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:33:31 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] /etc/fstab In-Reply-To: References: <27e6356a1002240638g74a5df65rdfc34deae7452291@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <27e6356a1002240733m1e936503pe8d1af42330a8bc3@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Thomas Rieff wrote: > As someone else mentioned, seeing your fstab may help us to help you. > How can I get to it??? Booting from something else (cd or usb device) and opening the file from there > When you say you tried the Ubuntu live CD, I'm guessing that's the > desktop one? > Yes ... > Yes you are probably right. Maybe quicker to reinstall. Bummer. Well, possibly if you were only in the process of initially setting things up. But as I mentioned, you can also boot to the live CD and install the necessary packages within the live session. > I was setting up the samba.conf ?file for global shares, etc. Well, making changes to the samba.conf (/etc/samba/smb.conf?) wouldn't also make changes to your /etc/fstab file, so that file was probably just fine. You may be best to undo any changes made to the fstab, then focus on your smb.conf. Also, a tip when working on configuration files: sometimes it can be handy to copy the file to filename-old (or whatever you prefer) before editing the file. Then if you REALLY screw something up, you can copy the -old file back over top of the original and be back where you started. - Justin From mkebob1134 at netscape.net Wed Feb 24 17:05:31 2010 From: mkebob1134 at netscape.net (Mr. B-o-B) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:05:31 -0600 (Central Standard Time) Subject: [tclug-list] Kinda OT - PINE / ALPINE Config question Message-ID: I have started using Alpine to my Usenet activities, and I cannot for the life of me figure out how to make it default to bottom post when I reply to a message. Any ideas how to config Alpine to when I reply the cursor will goto the end of the message, and not start at line 1? Many Thanks, B-o-B From tclug at freakzilla.com Wed Feb 24 18:02:28 2010 From: tclug at freakzilla.com (Yaron) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:02:28 -0600 (CST) Subject: [tclug-list] Kinda OT - PINE / ALPINE Config question In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi there, On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Mr. B-o-B wrote: > Any ideas how to config Alpine to when I reply the cursor will goto the > end of the message, and not start at line 1? Maybe Alpine's designed to help maintain good netiquette? I dunno that there's an option, but you can always just hold down ctrl-v for a while. -Yaron -- From mkebob1134 at netscape.net Wed Feb 24 21:23:52 2010 From: mkebob1134 at netscape.net (Mr. B-o-B) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:23:52 -0600 (Central Standard Time) Subject: [tclug-list] Kinda OT - PINE / ALPINE Config question In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Yaron cried from the depths of the abyss... > Hi there, > > On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Mr. B-o-B wrote: > >> Any ideas how to config Alpine to when I reply the cursor will goto the >> end of the message, and not start at line 1? > > Maybe Alpine's designed to help maintain good netiquette? > > I dunno that there's an option, but you can always just hold down ctrl-v > for a while. > > > -Yaron > Thanks. ctrl-v is better than nothing. B-o-B From dniesen at gmail.com Thu Feb 25 07:27:36 2010 From: dniesen at gmail.com (Donovan) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:27:36 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Free DNS hosting now that EveryDNS == DynDNS? In-Reply-To: <47f4d5e71002211241n8b06e59s877bea8ebafc6599@mail.gmail.com> References: <47f4d5e71002200824p582a949etff6faf0e4d6676fa@mail.gmail.com> <34de7f3d1002210922y5e560011tadc245b30f32aea6@mail.gmail.com> <7b7c42a31002210949j23b803d6q17924805e3fbaaa4@mail.gmail.com> <47f4d5e71002211241n8b06e59s877bea8ebafc6599@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <47f4d5e71002250527j54099332yeb9986d8ea25b865@mail.gmail.com> I found another company doing free DNS with apparently no strings attached: http://www.namecheap.com/freedns/free-manage-dns.aspx In case anybody else is still looking around. Thanks for all the suggestions everyone! On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Donovan wrote: > XName looks like it will fit the bill nicely. Thanks for the tip! > > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Andy Schmid wrote: > >> I use XNAME.ORG for primary and secondary DNS servers on my domains. It >> does everything I need, and totally free. >> >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Troy wrote: >> >>> Have you tried DynDNS? http://www.dyndns.com/ I use DynDNS and it >>> works great for my needs. >>> >>> Troy >>> >>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Donovan wrote: >>> >>>> Anybody have a recommendation for a free, self-managed DNS service >>>> (other than hosting my own...)? >>>> >>>> I always had freedns.afraid.org in the back of my mind but after >>>> looking more closely, it seems that others can create subdomains under your >>>> domains unless you sign up for the premium service ($60/year). >>>> >>>> If there isn't a good alternative, I'll just bite the bullet and get a >>>> good paid DNS service so recommendations in that arena would also be >>>> welcome. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Donovan Niesen >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >>>> tclug-list at mn-linux.org >>>> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >>> tclug-list at mn-linux.org >>> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Donovan Niesen > -- Donovan Niesen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100225/5f4c46d2/attachment.htm From nesius at gmail.com Thu Feb 25 09:43:22 2010 From: nesius at gmail.com (Robert Nesius) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:43:22 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Free DNS hosting now that EveryDNS == DynDNS? In-Reply-To: <47f4d5e71002250527j54099332yeb9986d8ea25b865@mail.gmail.com> References: <47f4d5e71002200824p582a949etff6faf0e4d6676fa@mail.gmail.com> <34de7f3d1002210922y5e560011tadc245b30f32aea6@mail.gmail.com> <7b7c42a31002210949j23b803d6q17924805e3fbaaa4@mail.gmail.com> <47f4d5e71002211241n8b06e59s877bea8ebafc6599@mail.gmail.com> <47f4d5e71002250527j54099332yeb9986d8ea25b865@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: I've used name-cheap. I had no problems. I'm not sure if they cap the number of free domains before they start charging... -Rob On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Donovan wrote: > I found another company doing free DNS with apparently no strings attached: > > http://www.namecheap.com/freedns/free-manage-dns.aspx > > In case anybody > else is still looking around. Thanks for all the suggestions everyone! > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Donovan wrote: > >> XName looks like it will fit the bill nicely. Thanks for the tip! >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Andy Schmid wrote: >> >>> I use XNAME.ORG for primary and secondary DNS servers on my domains. It >>> does everything I need, and totally free. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Troy wrote: >>> >>>> Have you tried DynDNS? http://www.dyndns.com/ I use DynDNS and it >>>> works great for my needs. >>>> >>>> Troy >>>> >>>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Donovan wrote: >>>> >>>>> Anybody have a recommendation for a free, self-managed DNS service >>>>> (other than hosting my own...)? >>>>> >>>>> I always had freedns.afraid.org in the back of my mind but after >>>>> looking more closely, it seems that others can create subdomains under your >>>>> domains unless you sign up for the premium service ($60/year). >>>>> >>>>> If there isn't a good alternative, I'll just bite the bullet and get a >>>>> good paid DNS service so recommendations in that arena would also be >>>>> welcome. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Donovan Niesen >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >>>>> tclug-list at mn-linux.org >>>>> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >>>> tclug-list at mn-linux.org >>>> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Donovan Niesen >> > > > > -- > Donovan Niesen > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100225/20387025/attachment.htm From mbmiller+l at gmail.com Thu Feb 25 10:06:45 2010 From: mbmiller+l at gmail.com (Mike Miller) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:06:45 -0600 (CST) Subject: [tclug-list] Kinda OT - PINE / ALPINE Config question In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Mr. B-o-B wrote: > I have started using Alpine to my Usenet activities, and I cannot for > the life of me figure out how to make it default to bottom post when I > reply to a message. > > Any ideas how to config Alpine to when I reply the cursor will goto the > end of the message, and not start at line 1? I am on the Alpine list and can ask there. Ctrl-v isn't quite what you want. You can jump directly to the top or bottom of even very long messages with these keystrokes: bottom Ctrl-w Ctrl-v top Ctrl-w Ctrl-y Mike From tclug at freakzilla.com Thu Feb 25 10:17:05 2010 From: tclug at freakzilla.com (Yaron) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:17:05 -0600 (CST) Subject: [tclug-list] Kinda OT - PINE / ALPINE Config question In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Mike Miller wrote: > bottom Ctrl-w Ctrl-v > top Ctrl-w Ctrl-y I'm only replying so I can try that out (: Cool, learn something new every day. Although frankly holding down ctrl-v probably takes less time than two keystrokes. Also "Search-PageDown"? How is that intuitive?... -Yaron -- From ryanjcole at me.com Thu Feb 25 10:16:24 2010 From: ryanjcole at me.com (Ryan Coleman) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:16:24 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] Kinda OT - PINE / ALPINE Config question In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4B86A258.2070900@me.com> The same as pico and nano for those used to that program. Mike Miller wrote: > On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Mr. B-o-B wrote: > > >> I have started using Alpine to my Usenet activities, and I cannot for >> the life of me figure out how to make it default to bottom post when I >> reply to a message. >> >> Any ideas how to config Alpine to when I reply the cursor will goto the >> end of the message, and not start at line 1? >> > > > I am on the Alpine list and can ask there. Ctrl-v isn't quite what you > want. You can jump directly to the top or bottom of even very long > messages with these keystrokes: > > bottom Ctrl-w Ctrl-v > top Ctrl-w Ctrl-y > > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > From mbmiller+l at gmail.com Thu Feb 25 12:27:14 2010 From: mbmiller+l at gmail.com (Mike Miller) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:27:14 -0600 (CST) Subject: [tclug-list] Kinda OT - PINE / ALPINE Config question In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Yaron wrote: > On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Mike Miller wrote: > >> bottom Ctrl-w Ctrl-v >> top Ctrl-w Ctrl-y > > I'm only replying so I can try that out (: Cool, learn something new > every day. Although frankly holding down ctrl-v probably takes less time > than two keystrokes. Sure, but if the doc is long, or the connection is slow, or you are using a handheld device where a screen isn't very many lines, then you'll be glad you know the trick. > Also "Search-PageDown"? How is that intuitive?... Right. I also *hate* the Ctrl-u and Ctrl-y in Alpine -- why not stick with the emacs keystrokes? It would have been so easy. I guess Pine didn't want to get into use of the Alt key. Mike From mbmiller+l at gmail.com Thu Feb 25 16:32:42 2010 From: mbmiller+l at gmail.com (Mike Miller) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:32:42 -0600 (CST) Subject: [tclug-list] Kinda OT - PINE / ALPINE Config question In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Mike Miller wrote: > On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Mr. B-o-B wrote: > >> I have started using Alpine to my Usenet activities, and I cannot for >> the life of me figure out how to make it default to bottom post when I >> reply to a message. >> >> Any ideas how to config Alpine to when I reply the cursor will goto the >> end of the message, and not start at line 1? > > > I am on the Alpine list and can ask there. They reminded my of the "_CURSORPOS_" token that can be placed in the signature file. It's a good way to deal with this. We had a few messages about it back in November 2008. See below. Also look for CURSORPOS here: Note that an Alpine documentation pages on signatures has this token misspelled as CURSORSPOS. Apparently there are a gazillion of these secret keywords: http://saul.baizman.net/node/63 Mike Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:02:29 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Miller To: Alpine Forum List Subject: Re: [Alpine-info] Reply Top Posting On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote: > On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, M.RossARR wrote: > >> Pine & Alpine offers the signature to be at the top or bottom via: >> Setup-Config >> [ -Reply Preferences- ] >> [X] signature-at-bottom >> >> I will assume most users set it for bottom! Makes sense! >> >> Yet when reply is triggered, the cursor is always found at the top >> waiting to type, so off goes the writer top posting! It's natural! >> > > If you include in your signature the special token _CURSORPOS_, you can > choose where the cursor is placed when replying. > > Using what seems to be your signature as an example, you would change it to > everything between the lines of hyphens here: > > --------------------------------------- > _CURSORPOS_ > > -- > The Best to You & Yours, > M. Ross All Rights Reserved > mrossarr at nixsyspaus.org > --------------------------------------- > > Combine it with the signature-at-bottom option, and it should behave as > you want. Nobody replied to the above, so I'm resending it in the hope that it will be noticed. It is amazing what features of Alpine have been hidden from me for many years -- maybe I just need to look harder. The _CURSORPOS_ token is one of them. Mike Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:18:17 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Miller To: Chaitat Piriyastit Cc: Alpine Forum List Subject: Re: [Alpine-info] Reply Top Posting On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Chaitat Piriyastit wrote: > Err... I am not sure if my post is related or not. But what I do in my > daily life is to create 4 files in my home directory: > > .s1 .s2 .s3 .s4 > > These are all my signature in plain text file. And I place my signature > by CTRL+R .s[1-4] in the composer area. It's a little off of the original topic, but I also do what you do. I start with the cursor on top and I edit the message I am replying to before attaching my message (as above: I trimmed off a few unneeded things). This time I am not attaching a signature. For people who want bottom posting and a signature, the _CURSORPOS_ token looks like an excellent solution to me -- and it requires no modification of the code. If they don't want a signature at all, but they want bottom posting, they can create a signature that consists only of _CURSORPOS_ and possibly some newlines. They just need to enable "Signature at Bottom" in the "Reply Preferences" section of Setup -> Config. [ Reply Preferences ] [X] Signature at Bottom So I think Alpine already does what people want it to do. Mike From mkebob1134 at netscape.net Thu Feb 25 19:57:17 2010 From: mkebob1134 at netscape.net (Mr. B-o-B) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:57:17 -0600 (Central Standard Time) Subject: [tclug-list] Kinda OT - PINE / ALPINE Config question In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Mike Miller cried from the depths of the abyss... > On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Mike Miller wrote: > >> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Mr. B-o-B wrote: >> >>> I have started using Alpine to my Usenet activities, and I cannot for the >>> life of me figure out how to make it default to bottom post when I reply >>> to a message. >>> >>> Any ideas how to config Alpine to when I reply the cursor will goto the >>> end of the message, and not start at line 1? >> >> >> I am on the Alpine list and can ask there. > > > They reminded my of the "_CURSORPOS_" token that can be placed in the > signature file. It's a good way to deal with this. We had a few messages > about it back in November 2008. See below. Also look for CURSORPOS here: > > Note that an Alpine documentation pages on signatures has this token > misspelled as CURSORSPOS. Apparently there are a gazillion of these secret > keywords: > > http://saul.baizman.net/node/63 > > Mike > > > > Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:02:29 -0600 (CST) > From: Mike Miller > To: Alpine Forum List > Subject: Re: [Alpine-info] Reply Top Posting > > On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote: > >> On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, M.RossARR wrote: >> >>> Pine & Alpine offers the signature to be at the top or bottom via: >>> Setup-Config >>> [ -Reply Preferences- ] >>> [X] signature-at-bottom >>> >>> I will assume most users set it for bottom! Makes sense! >>> >>> Yet when reply is triggered, the cursor is always found at the top >>> waiting to type, so off goes the writer top posting! It's natural! >>> >> >> If you include in your signature the special token _CURSORPOS_, you can >> choose where the cursor is placed when replying. >> >> Using what seems to be your signature as an example, you would change it to >> everything between the lines of hyphens here: >> >> --------------------------------------- >> _CURSORPOS_ >> >> -- >> The Best to You & Yours, >> M. Ross All Rights Reserved >> mrossarr at nixsyspaus.org >> --------------------------------------- >> >> Combine it with the signature-at-bottom option, and it should behave as you >> want. > > > Nobody replied to the above, so I'm resending it in the hope that it will be > noticed. It is amazing what features of Alpine have been hidden from me for > many years -- maybe I just need to look harder. The _CURSORPOS_ token is one > of them. > > Mike > > > > Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:18:17 -0600 (CST) > From: Mike Miller > To: Chaitat Piriyastit > Cc: Alpine Forum List > Subject: Re: [Alpine-info] Reply Top Posting > > On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Chaitat Piriyastit wrote: > >> Err... I am not sure if my post is related or not. But what I do in my >> daily life is to create 4 files in my home directory: >> >> .s1 .s2 .s3 .s4 >> >> These are all my signature in plain text file. And I place my signature by >> CTRL+R .s[1-4] in the composer area. > > > It's a little off of the original topic, but I also do what you do. I start > with the cursor on top and I edit the message I am replying to before > attaching my message (as above: I trimmed off a few unneeded things). This > time I am not attaching a signature. > > For people who want bottom posting and a signature, the _CURSORPOS_ token > looks like an excellent solution to me -- and it requires no modification of > the code. If they don't want a signature at all, but they want bottom > posting, they can create a signature that consists only of _CURSORPOS_ and > possibly some newlines. They just need to enable "Signature at Bottom" in > the "Reply Preferences" section of Setup -> Config. > > [ Reply Preferences ] > > [X] Signature at Bottom > > So I think Alpine already does what people want it to do. > > Mike > Thank You all. The _CURSORPOS_ in the .sig file works well enough for what I desire. Rock on TCLUGer's. Mr. B-o-B From mbmiller+l at gmail.com Thu Feb 25 21:02:16 2010 From: mbmiller+l at gmail.com (Mike Miller) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:02:16 -0600 (CST) Subject: [tclug-list] Kinda OT - PINE / ALPINE Config question In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Mr. B-o-B wrote: > Thank You all. The _CURSORPOS_ in the .sig file works well enough for > what I desire. You're welcome, but allow me to recommend *trimming*. In other words, you don't have to include an entire chain of messages in a reply. I know it's easier for the author to not consider the needs of the reader, but as a reader I really appreciate the small effort. This consideration does limit the value of _CURSORPOS_, of course, but maybe you will earn more in gratitude what you will lose in time. Mike From goeko at Goecke-Dolan.com Fri Feb 26 09:22:41 2010 From: goeko at Goecke-Dolan.com (Brian Dolan-Goecke) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:22:41 -0600 Subject: [tclug-list] *Saturday* Authoring DVDs with Linux @PenguinsUnbound Linux Meeting Feb. 27th Message-ID: <4B87E741.8000000@Goecke-Dolan.com> This months PenguinsUnbound.com meeting will be Saturday February 27th at TIES, 1667 Snelling Ave. N., St. Paul, MN 55108 from 10:00am to 12:00pm (See the web site http://www.penguinsunbound.com for directions and more info.) This month at the PenguinsUnbound Meeting I will demonstrate how to author DVDs with Linux. So you can take your home movies and play then on any DVD player! Hope you are going to be able to make it. ==>brian. From chechugarriga at gmail.com Sat Feb 27 09:50:56 2010 From: chechugarriga at gmail.com (chechu garguez) Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:50:56 +0100 Subject: [tclug-list] Slow transfers from Samba to Windows 7 and Vista Message-ID: ethtool -s eth0 speed 100 duplex full autoneg off Hi. I am writing to You because your post on 2006 is still helpful and gives us a 10x samba connectivity enhancement. Thanks so much. Those are the things that makes me love open source and Debian GNU environments. Take care. Yours sincerely Chechugarriga -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100227/e9bdaffa/attachment.htm