On 12/8/2009 3:25 PM, Thomas Rieff wrote: > > *TCLUG,* > > *Is Zimbra ZCS a good choice for replacing Outlook???* > > *Currently we are not running an exchange server and Outlook clients > are stand alone.* > > *As I understand it, Zimbra ZCS would add web access and server > capability.* > > *Tom* > > * * > > Thomas Rieff > > *GreenCare* > > *1717 3rd Avenue* > > *Mankato, MN 56001* > > *(507) 344-8314 Office* > > *(507) 344-8316 Fax* > > *(507) 381-0660 Cell* > > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > Your question to me looks like "Is replacing a standalone MUA with a full fledged Groupware implementation a good choice?". I guess I have a question for you, what is the desired outcome of replacing outlook/what do you want to be able to do? From the bit I understood it looks like you want to be able to access your e-mail wherever using a MUA, and be able to access e-mail via a web based implementation. This by itself is fairly easy setup of Postfix (MTA) -> Courier IMAP(S) -> Web based MUA (Roundcube). (I know others may like other MTA's and IMAP servers). I have wanted to give Horde Groupware a go (http://www.horde.org/webmail/) but I haven't gotten around to it. I have never used Zimbra before so I cant really say whether or not that it the way to go. I'm fairly scared of Google so unfortunately I usually dot recommend them (IMO). -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20091208/b7a5c44a/attachment-0001.htm