Donovan wrote: > On Jan 9, 2008 8:03 PM, <auditodd at comcast.net> wrote: > >> Top post? >> Bottom post? >> Who gives a flying fart!? >> >> I'm intelligent enough to figure out the chronological order of a series of emails. >> >> Just because some web site somewhere shows 1 reason why bottom posting is "supposedly" better does NOT make it LAW. >> >> > > > I'm going to middle post. Aren't you the rebel > Screw anybody's convention. > > > > >> Quite frankly I could care less how someone posts as long as they trim out the excess text that has nothing to do with their reply. >> >> I also find it interesting that Microsoft is NOT the only software company whose email client top posts by default, so you can't blame it on Microsoft. >> >> Just my $0.02. >> >> -- >> ========== >> Todd Young >> >> -------------- Original message ---------------------- >> From: Jim Crumley <crumley at belka.space.umn.edu> >> >>> On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 02:45:25PM -0800, Anna Edwards wrote: >>> >>> First off, top posting to technical email list is bad. Please >>> stop. See for example: >>> http://catb.org/~esr//jargon/html/T/top-post.html >>> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >>> tclug-list at mn-linux.org >>> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >> tclug-list at mn-linux.org >> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >> >> > > > >