On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 09:14:24AM -0600, Adam Maloney wrote: > >I have two subnetworks (10.10.0.0 - 100 Mbit and 10.0.0.0 - Gigabit) > >separated by a linux server that acts as a router. I am running dhcpd3 > >on the router, but I have a problem with the configuration. > > IIRC, the protocol supports specifying additional routes for the client to > install, but not a netmask, so it defaults to classful. Your route for > the 10.0.0.0/24 network would be installed as a /8 in the client. I just > checked and I don't even see this option in ISC DHCP3... > > If this is the case, a workaround would be to set the default gateway on > the clients to the Linux router, and let the router reroute the packets to > the DSL. Not 100% optimal since the packets go over the same network > twice, but you're talking about a DSL line, I don't think it's going to > severely impact performance on a 100M LAN. I will try this. > Another option may be to add another NIC to the router and have the router > be the real gateway for the DSL. But this may not be an option depending > on the rest of your setup. Nope - I am out of PCI slots: one for GigE and one for USB 2.0. florin -- Don't question authority: they don't know either! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20050310/25a786bc/attachment.pgp