Yup it's 222, I found this last night. You have to "turn on" ssh from the IPCop interface first but that is the way it should be. John Meier wrote: > 22 is probably not the port the ipcop machine is doin' sshd on - I > think it's 222 so that you can port forward 22 ... > > try to ssh to 222 > > > On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:54:12 -0500, Rick Meyerhoff <rick at eworld3.net> wrote: > >>Jack Ungerleider wrote: >> >>>Why not make IPCop the name server for the local machines? The last time I >>>used it that was an option. >>> >>>Jack >> >>I'm sure that this is technically possible but it's not really the job >>of a firewall and that's why they don't include bind in the IPCop >>distro. At least that's my understanding from reading their FAQ. >> >>I have not been able to ssh into IPCop, I get "port 22: Connection refused". >> >> >>>On Friday 24 September 2004 03:45 pm, rbentz at dunwoody.edu wrote: >>> >>> >>>>How about setting up a Name server? BIND or Windoze has recursive >>>>ability, which means you point your client to the local name server for >>>>resolution and then point your name server to IPCop. The name server >>>>will resolve local names and use the IPCop machine as root hint to >>>>resolve others. >>>>The downside is incoming queries, from outside or the red network. I'm >>>>not sure how that would be setup. >>>>--OR-- >>>>Setup a hosts file with all the names and periodically copy it down to >>>>the clients. >>>> >>>>I am assuming that you are simply trying to get name resolution to work, >>>>correct? >>>> >>>>--Rob >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>DHCP works better if I DON'T assign MAC addresses to IPs. >>>>> >>>>>Charlie O wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Rick, >>>>>> >>>>>>I'm pretty sure that what you need to do, is associate specific mac >>>>>>addresses with specific ip addresses for ipcop to make the >>>> >>>>connection. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>Since IPCop is doing DHCP ( ie, assigning IP addresses), you can't >>>>>>guarantee that each machine will always get the same IP. You need >>>>>>static IP assignment for those machines, to associate them with a >>>> >>>>host >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>name. >>>>>><CUT> >>>>>>Charlie Obert >>>>>> >>>>>>On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:37:30 -0500, Rick Meyerhoff >>>> >>>><rick at eworld3.net> >>>> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>I am trying to get my IPCop box working. It is doing DHCP but it >>>> >>>>does >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>not seem to be getting the host names from the machines on my >>>> >>>>network. >>>> >>>><CUT> >>>> >>>>>>>Eric (Rick) Meyerhoff >>>>> >>>>>-- >>>>>Eric (Rick) Meyerhoff >>>> >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >>>>Help beta test TCLUG's potential new home: http://plone.mn-linux.org >>>>Got pictures for TCLUG? Beta test http://plone.mn-linux.org/gallery >>>>tclug-list at mn-linux.org >>>>https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >>> >>> >>-- >> >> >>Eric (Rick) Meyerhoff >> >>_______________________________________________ >>TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >>Help beta test TCLUG's potential new home: http://plone.mn-linux.org >>Got pictures for TCLUG? Beta test http://plone.mn-linux.org/gallery >>tclug-list at mn-linux.org >>https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >> > > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > Help beta test TCLUG's potential new home: http://plone.mn-linux.org > Got pictures for TCLUG? Beta test http://plone.mn-linux.org/gallery > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > -- Eric (Rick) Meyerhoff _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota Help beta test TCLUG's potential new home: http://plone.mn-linux.org Got pictures for TCLUG? Beta test http://plone.mn-linux.org/gallery tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list