On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:47:52 -0500 (CDT) Nate Carlson <natecars at real-time.com> wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, Josh Trutwin wrote: > > Research into this issue shows that the SA spamd daemon scans a > > message in about 1-3 seconds, but then spamc sits and sits for > > minutes. If I run spamc with the -c flag (which doesn't generate > > the verbose report) then it's just as quick as spamd. But I like > > having the report so I can see why false positives/negatives > > occured and act accordingly. > > > > Any thoughts? Should I be posting to a Debian list? > > Have you tried manually running a message through spamc with > verbosity turned up, so you can see where it's hanging up? There is no spamc verbosity, only spamd, and yes I have turned it on. spamd does it's thing then spamc sits and sits. I tried running strace on it and there is just a period of time where it sits and prints nothing as well, sometimes for 5 minutes. Even running just plain old spamassassin on a sample message exhibits the same behavior. One of the oddest things I've come across. No one on the SA/QS lists has had a helpful reply so I'm still grasping at straws, getting close to offering a cash reward... :) Josh _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota Help beta test TCLUG's potential new home: http://plone.mn-linux.org Got pictures for TCLUG? Beta test http://plone.mn-linux.org/gallery tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list