Josh Trutwin writes: > I think I will, but many people seem to think SPF is a waste of time > (I'm still sitting on the fence myself) so I am currently trying to > research SPF a little more. SPF is a method of preventing forgeries, nothing more. It won't stop spam. If forgeries are a problem for you and you can't use digital signatures and you can live with the drawbacks of SPF, then go ahead and use it for your domains. Otherwise, don't bother. http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/smtp-spf-is-harmful.html http://www.taugh.com./mp/lmap.html -- David Phillips <david at acz.org> http://david.acz.org/ _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota Help beta test TCLUG's potential new home: http://plone.mn-linux.org Got pictures for TCLUG? Beta test http://plone.mn-linux.org/gallery tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list