I saw a benchmark awhile back that showed the celeron 1ghz performing slightly better than the PIII900. I think it was because the 1ghz celeron was the newer generation processor, while the PIII 900 was the old one. On Jan 5, 2004, at 9:38 AM, Ken Fuchs wrote: > Jay Austad wrote: > >> ..., but I can't seem to find any of the ones with the 1ghz+ >> celerons in them. Most are pIII 900's. > > A pIII 900 MHz system would probably perform better than a Celeron 1+ > GHz system. Why would one want a Celeron 1+ GHz system over a pIII 900 > MHz? Could it be a price consideration or some other reason? > > Sincerely, > > Ken Fuchs <kfuchs at winternet.com> > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list