I saw a benchmark awhile back that showed the celeron 1ghz performing 
slightly better than the PIII900.  I think it was because the 1ghz 
celeron was the newer generation processor, while the PIII 900 was the 
old one.

On Jan 5, 2004, at 9:38 AM, Ken Fuchs wrote:

> Jay Austad wrote:
>
>> ..., but I can't seem to find any of the ones with the 1ghz+
>> celerons in them.  Most are pIII 900's.
>
> A pIII 900 MHz system would probably perform better than a Celeron 1+
> GHz system.  Why would one want a Celeron 1+ GHz system over a pIII 900
> MHz?  Could it be a price consideration or some other reason?
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Ken Fuchs <kfuchs at winternet.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota
> http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org
> https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list


_______________________________________________
TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota
http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org
https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list