All hail the god, "business".





I don't think so.



David Phillips wrote:

>Sam MacDonald writes:
>  
>
>>The problem I see in all these browser based tools.  The fact that the
>>administration can be done in India or Brazil at 1/3 the cost of US
>>workers.  The tools make it so easy to administer servers that an
>>untrained person can do the work.
>>    
>>
>
>That argument is ridiculous.  Why do I want to do a job that an untrained
>monkey can do?  I don't.  If my job is so simple that it can be replaced by
>a better piece of software and a monkey, then I'm worthless.  I deserve to
>get replaced.  When that day comes, it's time to do something else.
>
>Suppose I'm a system administrator and have a task to do every day that
>takes me an hour.  If I write a program to do that job for me, does that
>make me less valuable?  No, it makes me more valuable.  That means I now
>have an extra hour a day to do things that make my company money.  Not
>writing the program is wasting my company money, assuming the amount of time
>it takes to write the program is reasonable.
>
>Jobs get sent out of country because no one here wants to do them.  Very few
>people want to stand in a factory all day and do the exact same repetitive
>task.  Those jobs are either replaced by a machine or given to a foreigner.
>
>Don't be upset because your job was to push a button, and we found a way to
>eliminate the button or get someone cheaper to push it.
>
>  
>
>>All these companies need to do social impact studies before they
>>decide to write software.
>>    
>>
>
>Better technology will always put people out of work temporarily.  That
>doesn't mean we shouldn't create the technology.  It enables far more jobs
>in the future.  What if computers weren't created because it put typists out
>of work?
>
>My job consists of solving problems by writing software.  There are three
>scenarios that would force me to do something else:
>
>- No one needs new software or needs existing software to be modified
>- Cheaper people can do the same job as me
>- Computers can program themselves
>
>As long as computers exist, there will always be a demand for new software
>to be created and for existing software to be modified.
>
>I don't just write software.  I solve problems.  There are a number of
>steps: understanding a problem, talking to the right people, engineering a
>design, writing the software, testing the software, deploying the software,
>etc.  Software also has to be maintained and modified.  Software must meet
>business requirements, be secure and be robust.  These things don't happen
>by accident, and they don't get any cheaper by sending them outside the
>office, much less outside the country.
>
>Programming requires creativity, which is a part of sentience.  As soon as
>computers have that, the game is over.  Having to find a new line of work
>will be the least of my worries.  I don't know if that day will be good or
>bad, but it will certainly be interesting.
>
>  
>


_______________________________________________
TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota
http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org
https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list