OK. For the terribly intolerant folk amongs us, myself included at
times, I propose a couple steps before replying. I know I've been
hot-headed in the past, and when I feel that my reply can be
constructive rather than simply abrasive, I'll write something. I'll
postpone a reply message for a period so I can go over it again, and I
usually end up editing quite a bit out.
* Take a deep breath and count to 100.
* Do not attribute to malice what could easily be interpreted as
ignorance or humor.
* If it ticks you off, delete it.
* If it ticks you off a lot, killfile it.
* If it is a legitimate abuse, report it to the list maintainer.
* Unsubscribe
# Example score-based killfile in procmail. A XX^1 adds XX to the score
# when a match is made. See procmailsc(5) for details.
:0
* -99^0
* 50^1 ^From.*kindajerk at domain\.tld
* 100^1 ^From.*realjerk at domain\.tld
* 5^0.9 sucks|keyword
* 50^1 ^References:.*03040503022.emailserver.tld
* 50^1 ^Subject:.*Bad thread
{
:0
* ^Message-Id: \/.*
{ LOG="Killed Message-Id: $MATCH
"
}
:0
/dev/null
}
--
Chad Walstrom <chewie at wookimus.net> http://www.wookimus.net/
assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20030915/e4292077/attachment.pgp