On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 04:34:22PM -0600, Daniel Taylor wrote: > Have you _read_ the license for Pine? I have. I think the author of nano explains it well: http://www.asty.org/articles/20010702pine.html > Debian doesn't distribute it in a binary package because > even the slight modifications to the source tree to package > it could violate the license UWash distributes it under. That's fine, I don't want anyone modifying pico/pine =) > under. If you can't burn the binaries onto a CD and sell the CD legally > it can't go in main. Redistribution of this release is permitted as follows, or by mutual agreement: (a) In free-of-charge or at-cost distributions by non-profit concerns; (b) In free-of-charge distributions by for-profit concerns; (c) Inclusion in a CD-ROM collection of free-of-charge, shareware, or non-proprietary software for which a fee may be charged for the packaged distribution. ^--- -- Matthew S. Hallacy FUBAR, LART, BOFH Certified http://www.poptix.net GPG public key 0x01938203 _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list