I use speakeasy and they use covad as the underlying telco. I looked at the covad ISP packages a while back and they seem quite similar to speakeasy. I have been using speakeasy for years hosting my domains. I vote for covad and speakeasy :) Qworst does not get my vote. gkrueger wrote: > Hey All: > > I just signed up for Covad DSL -- 30 day risk-free trial supposedly. > Here's my question: has anyone on the list used Covad DSL to host a > web-visible server (e.g. webserver, MX server)? I ordered the service > with the static IP's, and it is my intention to host both a webserver > and a mailserver (LINUX), but their FAQ's (at least what I've seen so > far) are not terrible helpful in this area other than to point out > that they don't support LINUX specifically with their flavor of PPPoE. > > Obviously, this is a non-issue with Qwest, but Qworst hasn't figured > out how to get their DSL into my neighborhood yet :( > > Thanks for any insight you have! > > Garrett > > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list