Chad Walstrom writes: > David's post wasn't part of the thread, and it made sweeping, stark > comments about security without giving supporting statements or > references. It was a troll. Please look up the definition of troll. Pay specific attention to the part about being ``intentionally incorrect''. Just because you are ignorant of or choose to ignore publicly documented information that is easily found using Google does not make me a troll. Also, please pay attention to the context of my message. It was a direct response to Sam MacDonald's statement of being tired of Microsoft providing security patches. Many popular pieces of open source software have had many security holes. Microsoft certainly does not have a monopoly on patching security holes. -- David Phillips <david at acz.org> http://david.acz.org/ _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list