I wrote: > Digital signatures are OK, if you feel it's absolutely necessary. On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 11:49:27PM -0500, Florin Iucha wrote: > Now, now, Chewie... What about the digital signatures? I meant exactly what I said. Digital signatures are useful if and when your emails need to be verifiable. I don't believe every post I send to the list is all that important, so why should I sign them all? YMMV, so I don't begrudge people who feel its necessary to sign everything. I can envision occassions where the habitual signing of each email is actually beneficial. Regardless, does that clear up any confusion I may have caused? -- Chad Walstrom <chewie at wookimus.net> http://www.wookimus.net/ assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20030812/8289d331/attachment.pgp