On Sun, Sep 15, 2002 at 11:11:03AM -0500, Munir Nassar wrote:
>On Sat, 14 Sep 2002, Bob Tanner wrote:
>i do not think that this is a good idea, 
>
>what about BSD? there a a couple of BSD users around here (hey gabe!) and 
>how about MacOSX(hey spencet!) is it covered too?

read: related technologies


>
>how about someone implementing samba on the server side, and he has a 
>client side question can they?

ditto here.

>how about .sigs? they kinda started this, are they supposed to conform 
>too?

god damn dood.

>are we going to have a "list" of approved subjects we can talk about? 
>kinda reminds me of the "list" of approved websites chinese people can go 
>to

Overreacting a bit aren't you?

>Munir Nassar
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota
>http://www.mn-linux.org
>tclug-list at mn-linux.org
>https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list
>

-- 
Ben Lutgens				 | http://people.sistina.com/~blutgens/	
System Administrator	 | http://www.sistina.com/
Sistina Software Inc. | 

"If you love something set it free, if it doesn't come back to you
hunt it down and set it on fire" -- George Carlin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20020916/4a692a39/attachment.pgp