On Sun, Sep 15, 2002 at 11:11:03AM -0500, Munir Nassar wrote: >On Sat, 14 Sep 2002, Bob Tanner wrote: >i do not think that this is a good idea, > >what about BSD? there a a couple of BSD users around here (hey gabe!) and >how about MacOSX(hey spencet!) is it covered too? read: related technologies > >how about someone implementing samba on the server side, and he has a >client side question can they? ditto here. >how about .sigs? they kinda started this, are they supposed to conform >too? god damn dood. >are we going to have a "list" of approved subjects we can talk about? >kinda reminds me of the "list" of approved websites chinese people can go >to Overreacting a bit aren't you? >Munir Nassar > > >_______________________________________________ >Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >http://www.mn-linux.org >tclug-list at mn-linux.org >https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > -- Ben Lutgens | http://people.sistina.com/~blutgens/ System Administrator | http://www.sistina.com/ Sistina Software Inc. | "If you love something set it free, if it doesn't come back to you hunt it down and set it on fire" -- George Carlin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20020916/4a692a39/attachment.pgp