On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 09:07:42AM -0600, Liz Burke-Scovill wrote: > > True. I'm just wondering how long it's going to be before people > > start complainging about how the Red Hat Enterprise version's release > > cycle is too slow and their version of KDE is almost a year old and > > it's utterly worthless because everything is so obsolete and... > > For my production environmnet, I'd rather have a slow release cycle as > long as it's stable! :) Absolutely. It was a reference to a common phenonmenon on the debian-user list: Every few weeks, some yutz shows up and starts making all the complaints mentioned above as soon as they see the age of the stable distro and everyone else gets to explain to him that it's called _stable_ for a reason. Hopefully, Debian won't have to put up with that sort of thing any more. More likely, Red Hat will be sharing in the pain. -- When we reduce our own liberties to stop terrorism, the terrorists have already won. - reverius Innocence is no protection when governments go bad. - Tom Swiss