> > Anyone know why Cisco EOL'd the 67x? > > > > I mean they had a monopoly in places like Qworst land. Why kill the the product? > > Phase out CBOS? EOL doesn't mean dead, at least for a few years, Probably, since they can't seem to produce a decent version. > anyway. I'll still use my Cisco 675 for a couple years to come at least. 678 maybe, but 675? Don't bet on it. Qwest hasn't sold/used the 675 for quite some time now, AFAIK. They were telling new customers that the 675 would not work with the lines now, or soon wouldn't. Details are fuzzy but something to do with CAP and DMT or some such. I know there are 2 different CBOS' for the 678 and it pertains to this somehow. If anyone knows more details, I'd be interested. I've got one of each here, would like to know what the real story is. Mike Jentges > > -- > Chad Walstrom <chewie at wookimus.net> | a.k.a. ^chewie > http://www.wookimus.net/ | s.k.a. gunnarr > Get my public key, ICQ#, etc. $(mailx -s 'get info' chewie at wookimus.net) >