The thing that sucks is that I'm stuck with ATT Broadband. I'm too far from the CO to get DSL, and I'd have to buy a very tall mast to get SB Wireless's 802.11 link, plus the horrendous setup fee. I could get a T1, but the just the loop fee will run me $440 a month, plus another $600 minimum for the access fee. ATT broadband sucks bigtime, but they don't NAT my traffic anymore. Vonage complained to them, and it seems they've fixed it, at least for now. It appears that they were only NAT'ing traffic destined for Vonage's network. I generated some fake SIP traffic and sent it to another box out on the net, and it came through with no modification. I wish ATT would get off their asses and start offering some kind of business plan that would allow users to have static ip's and run servers. Time Warner has a few plans, but I can't get them here. Even if I could get DSL here, I don't know if I would since I would be giving money to Qwest, and they suck worse than ATT. Jay > -----Original Message----- > From: Kelly Black [mailto:kelly.black at penguinpackets.com] > Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 8:24 AM > To: tclug-list at mn-linux.org > Subject: Re: [TCLUG] ATT is modifying some of my traffic > Importance: High > > > On Saturday 13 July 2002 01:17, Munir Nassar wrote: > > On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Bob Tanner wrote: > > > Local ISP don't mind if you do this :-) > > > > is this our regularly sceduled Real-Time plug? ;-) > > > > -munir > > > > Valid point though. > > Kelly Black > _______________________________________________ > Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. > Paul, Minnesota > http://www.mn-linux.org > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >