It's working now. Everytime I imagine their network admins, I hear circus music and see a clown trying to balance with one foot on top of a big beach ball. <sigh> > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Layer [mailto:wlayer at attbi.com] > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:08 AM > To: tclug-list at mn-linux.org > Subject: [TCLUG] ATTBI on it's collective face > > > Anyone have a grasp on what the _real_ problem is with attbi > these days? What is up with this host (12.126.248.73)? > > PING mail.attbi.com (216.148.227.71) from 10.0.0.2 : 56(84) > bytes of data. 64 bytes from mail.attbi.com (216.148.227.71): > icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=1504 ms > > PING google.com (216.239.51.100) from 10.0.0.2 : 56(84) bytes > of data. 64 bytes from www.google.com (216.239.51.100): > icmp_seq=1 ttl=42 time=1538 ms > > traceroute to mail.attbi.com (216.148.227.71), 30 hops max, > 38 byte packets 1 wiggum (10.0.0.1) 2.205 ms 1.911 ms > 1.804 ms 2 10.229.184.1 (10.229.184.1) 11.345 ms 10.878 > ms 11.908 ms 3 ubr02-p1-0.minnhe1.mn.attbb.net > (24.31.2.210) 15.313 ms 12.494 ms > 10.014 > ms > 4 bic03-p5-0.rosehe1.mn.attbb.net (24.31.2.214) 11.184 ms > 11.593 ms > 10.815 > ms > 5 12.126.248.73 (12.126.248.73) 1508.035 ms 1481.069 ms > 1483.360 ms > > traceroute to google.com (216.239.35.100), 30 hops max, 38 > byte packets 1 wiggum (10.0.0.1) 2.444 ms 2.066 ms 1.876 > ms 2 10.229.184.1 (10.229.184.1) 13.018 ms 27.557 ms > 13.929 ms 3 ubr02-p1-0.minnhe1.mn.attbb.net (24.31.2.210) > 15.502 ms 17.374 ms > 21.859 > ms > 4 bic03-p5-0.rosehe1.mn.attbb.net (24.31.2.214) 18.383 ms > 10.567 ms > 20.942 > ms > 5 12.126.248.73 (12.126.248.73) 1512.904 ms 1527.881 ms > 1575.885 ms > > > -.bill.layer.- .-frogtown.mn.usa.- > > _______________________________________________ > Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. > Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.mn-> linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >