On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 12:01:42PM -0600, Andrew Nemchenko wrote: > Wow its the first time I've seen this before. > But what was the dirty word? I don't know, but spamassassin has been flagging all of your entries into this thread due to the exclamation marks in the subject (like everyone else in this thread) and because of "Bulk email software fingerprints found in headers." I have no clue why your getting singled out. Here's the relevant chunk of spamassassin created header: X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=3.7 required=3.5 tests=RATWARE,PLING_PLING,PLING version=2.01 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.01 (devel $Id: SpamAssassin.pm,v 1.61 2002/01/25 04:41:02 jmason Exp $) X-Spam-Prev-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Spam-Report: 3.67 hits, 3.5 required; * 2.0 -- Bulk email software fingerprints found in headers * 1.2 -- Subject has lots of exclamation marks * 0.5 -- Subject has an exclamation mark Anyway, maybe there's a bug in their filter and they think that its spam, but they're saying its dirty. -- Jim Crumley |Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List (TCLUG) crumley at fields.space.umn.edu |Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota Ruthless Debian Zealot |http://www.mn-linux.org/ Never laugh at live dragons |Dmitry's free,Jon's next? http://faircopyright.org