On Wed, 2002-02-06 at 12:39, Ben Lutgens wrote:
> Hrm.... Guess I never thought of that. It doesn't seem to matter what
> you tell the BIOS in linux. I'll have to shut that pig down this weekend
> and check that out.

The resend of this mail was done by using mutt's "b" key (which is
bounce)

I figured i'd just test to see if it works and didn't assign a new date
stamp. Looks like mailman needs some dupe checking... Personally i think
someone's been "b" keying alot of the old mails we've all been seeing.
It would require more investigation than I care to do, but it's a
definite possibility.

-- 
Ben Lutgens		http://people.sistina.com/~blutgens/	
Sistina Software Inc.

pub  1024D/9A0DDC59 2001-12-12 Ben Lutgens <blutgens at sistina.com>
     Key fingerprint = 8FCD A1EE CEA7 DEE1 9361  F32C 0A90 30D1 9A0D
DC59
sub  1024g/1FC75C99 2001-12-12
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20020208/243b3521/attachment.pgp