On Wed, 2002-02-06 at 12:39, Ben Lutgens wrote: > Hrm.... Guess I never thought of that. It doesn't seem to matter what > you tell the BIOS in linux. I'll have to shut that pig down this weekend > and check that out. The resend of this mail was done by using mutt's "b" key (which is bounce) I figured i'd just test to see if it works and didn't assign a new date stamp. Looks like mailman needs some dupe checking... Personally i think someone's been "b" keying alot of the old mails we've all been seeing. It would require more investigation than I care to do, but it's a definite possibility. -- Ben Lutgens http://people.sistina.com/~blutgens/ Sistina Software Inc. pub 1024D/9A0DDC59 2001-12-12 Ben Lutgens <blutgens at sistina.com> Key fingerprint = 8FCD A1EE CEA7 DEE1 9361 F32C 0A90 30D1 9A0D DC59 sub 1024g/1FC75C99 2001-12-12 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20020208/243b3521/attachment.pgp