Bob Tanner <tanner at real-time.com> wrote: > > Quoting Joel Rosenberg (joelr at ellegon.com): > > Well, both of which are bad, but I think it's more practical, at least in > > anything but the longest run, to protect yourself by means likely to be more > > effective than trying to talk people out of using Outlook right now. With > > all its flaws, it does have features that are not easily reproducible, and it > > is the standard. > > WHOSE standard? Heh, no kidding.. Mail clients are still probably the most diverse application these days.. I suppose the thing that is closest to being a standard is webmail.. -- _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ ___ _ _ __ What happens if you put a / \/ \(_)| ' // ._\ / - \(_)/ ./| ' /(__ slinky on an escalator? \_||_/|_||_|_\\___/ \_-_/|_|\__\|_|_\ __) [ Mike Hicks | http://umn.edu/~hick0088/ | mailto:hick0088 at tc.umn.edu ] -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20020205/7acb6f6e/attachment.pgp