Having an internal discussion at Real Time about kerberos. As an undergrad, kerberos was -it- for a secure network environment. Most of the interstructure authenticated and authorized against kerberos. Login, mail, even AFS (can't remember what is was really called back then, transarc?). Anyways, with openssh, ssl, generic TLS stuff. Is kerberos necessary still? Some people here are arguing the kerberos is "old" technology and not necessary. Others argue about security issue in kerberos. Still others argue that kerberos is the only was to support things like secure/token cards. So, anyone have comments? -- Minneapolis St. Paul Twin Cities MN | Phone : (952)943-8700 http://www.mn-linux.org Minnesota Linux | Fax : (952)943-8500 Key fingerprint = 6C E9 51 4F D5 3E 4C 66 62 A9 10 E5 35 85 39 D9