On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 08:41:30AM -0600, Clay Fandre wrote: >Why don't address this message to Codeweavers? You're preaching to the >choir on this one. > Heh, cause codeweavers hackers are probably on this list. I'd rather they know my sentiments were expressed in public forum. Also it looks like I forgot to fix0r the subject too :-( sorry about that. >Ben Lutgens wrote: >>Is it just me, or is Codeweavers shooting themselves in the foot by not >>distributing a demo version of thier office plugin? >>I mean, i don't know about all of you, but i'm not paying almost 60.00 for >>something i can't try first..... >> >>I'd be interested to know how sales fared in comparison to thier browser >>plugin app. >> > > >_______________________________________________ >Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >http://www.mn-linux.org >tclug-list at mn-linux.org >https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > -- Ben Lutgens http://people.sistina.com/~blutgens/ Sistina Software Inc. (mail -s "get -info" blutgens-info at sistina.com) for my gpg key, IM info etc. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20020402/b6ee8c9d/attachment.pgp