Why try to find a product to do that when ive already written it? The software is currently in the testing phase (and I already have an interested party). Btw, it also not only blocks based on content but does firewalling, nat, and bandwidth management (like packeteer) plus whatever else i decide to throw in there. And an average processor of today could easily handle a T3 or more. When and *if* this becomes an actual product I'll be sure and send you guys the link so you can donate your hard-earned cash. If your nice though, maybe I'll ask for some people interested in beta testing it in the (near) future. Email me offline if you have a serious interest. Cant promise anything though... :) Touché. At 11:30 PM 9/3/01 -0500, you wrote: >Touché - who can count the number of great ideas that have died for lack of >scalability > >"Scott M. Dier" wrote: > >> On 03 Sep 2001 22:05:20 -0500, Jason DeStefano wrote: >> > though. Its better than just blocking ALL port 80. I'd rather block >> > even legit stuff that mentions "default.ida" that ALL HTTP. Thats >> > just silly. >> >> And when you find a network device large enough thats cost effective for >> $46 to $40/mo internet access users for an ISP that can do this sort of >> thing to gigs of traffic, let me know. >> >> -- >> Scott Dier <dieman at ringworld.org> <sdier at debian.org> >> http://www.ringworld.org/ #linuxos at irc.openprojects.net >> _______________________________________________ >> tclug-list mailing list >> tclug-list at mn-linux.org >> https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > >-- >Paul Overby >Poverby at megsinet.net >Office: 651-686-6074 >Home: 452-3233 > > >_______________________________________________ >tclug-list mailing list >tclug-list at mn-linux.org >https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >