Sid == testing Woody == unstable Correct? Dan Drake wrote: > On Fri, 11 May 2001, Ben Kochie wrote: > > is it just me, or is the sid/main/binary-i386 tree _empty_?? and i386 in > > woody is close to empty? > > Here's what I see in sid/main/binary-i386/ at ftp.debian.org: > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 debian debian 4862788 May 11 19:25 Packages > -rw-rw-r-- 1 debian debian 1347315 May 11 19:25 Packages.gz > -rw-rw-r-- 1 debian debian 82 May 11 19:34 Release > > Looks pretty empty to me! > > I dunno; as long as apt-get works for me, I figure the Debian folks can > do whatever they want to their ftp server... > > Incidentally, what *is* sid? I know potato is the current stable > version, and woody is the next version...do I have this diagram right? > > potato <-> stable > woody <-> testing > sid <-> unstable > > I'm still a bit confused about the Debian naming convenctions; it was > only a couple months ago that I Saw The Light and switched from Redhat. :) > > Dan > > -- > /*-------------------------------- > Dan Drake <drake at lemongecko.org> > http://lemongecko.org/drake/ > --------pgp encouraged----------*/ > > _______________________________________________ > tclug-list mailing list > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list -- Nate Sanders nate at chef.nerp.net http://www.damnation.net IRC: darkskull at NEWNET