On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote: > > Not necessarily. For doing logical volumes, it's nice to have a handle on > > the physical location. That's the way VMS (sorry to mention it 3 times in > > one day) handles things, but you can create a logical name and say that > > your directory, [foo.dir] is found on c:, d:, g:, and h:. Called bound > > volumes, and I think it's the wheel that the LVM project(s) are > > reinventing. > > I thought that's what disklabels are for? > I don't know squat about disklabels, tho; so I could be wrong. I'm not sure we're not saying the same thing. Maybe a bound volume *gets* a disklable? Last one to figure it out's a rotten egg. :) -- "To misattribute a quote is unforgivable." --Anonymous