> where your wireless peers are willing to route for you if > your not close > enough to a 'base' and they are. :) Sure I am. Except, the more I think about it, the more I think it's not going to work like I want without giving everyone on the wireless network private addresses and doing NAT at each internet connection, or getting an AS number and handing routes back to the ISP's (which surely won't happen over DSL links). > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Dier [mailto:dieman at ringworld.org] > Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 9:02 AM > To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > Subject: Re: [TCLUG] more wireless internet fun > > > * Austad, Jay <austad at marketwatch.com> [010102 01:02]: > > > its really designed for links that are usually up. BGP > flaps aren't > > > exactly elegant things. > > DSL links are usually up (at least mine is, and it gets > monitored 24/7). > > Won't it only get marked as flapping if it's going up and > down every couple > > Oh, your not talking about cool things like wireless fabric > type things, > where your wireless peers are willing to route for you if > your not close > enough to a 'base' and they are. :) > > -- > Scott Dier <dieman at ringworld.org> #linuxos at irc.openprojects.net > http://www.ringworld.org/ finger:dieman at destiny.ringworld.org > > "Kupo, kupkup, kupopo... Po... Kupo!? KUPOPO!!! > <Chomp chomp> Kupooo." > -Moguta (FFIX) >